<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Doctor Who Forum | Troughton1966-69 | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/troughton1966-69/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/troughton1966-69/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Troughton1966-69.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cf99ddd38877e31e4f3e26de4f46170e</guid>
				<title>Craig replied to the topic The Time Meddler part 2 in the forum The First Doctor</title>
				<link>http://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/the-time-meddler-part-2/#post-26447</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:32:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/troughton1966-69/' rel="nofollow">@troughton1966-69</a> You should never base your viewing decisions on trailers.</p>
<p>If something is bad they stick all the best bits in the trailer, then you&#8217;re disappointed when you watch it. </p>
<p>If something is good they often have no idea how to convey how good it is in a few minutes, because all of it is good. Where do you start?</p>
<p>Therefore, if a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-28280"><a href="http://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/the-time-meddler-part-2/#post-26447" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>