<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Doctor Who Forum | Jim4 | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Jim4.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 03:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2f20ef9efc807c023686d299d2f13339</guid>
				<title>CoenusScaldingus replied to the topic Jodie Whittaker announced as the new, 13th Doctor in the forum The Thirteenth Doctor</title>
				<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60914</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/juniperfish/' rel="nofollow">@juniperfish</a> To the defence of the makers of BBC nature documentaries (whom I adore), I am sure various shows have included footage of some snails having a good time, which would technically be bisexual hermaphrodites or somesuch. (What a weird start to my second post on these boards!)</p>
<p><a href='https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/' rel="nofollow">@jim4</a> Until a century or so ago, blue was actually a feminine&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69592"><a href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60914" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">513ec5612629cd429ef8a5eb5d7de6c3</guid>
				<title>JimTheFish replied to the topic Jodie Whittaker announced as the new, 13th Doctor in the forum The Thirteenth Doctor</title>
				<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60901</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many on here are doing well in engaging with the one-post wonders, who will no doubt slink back off to the Daily Heil after they&#8217;ve had their little rants. But just a reminder to them that while they&#8217;re here, they might like to take note of the site <a href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forum-etiquette/" rel="nofollow">etiquette</a>. Particularly the clause on personal abuse of members. (Yes, I&#8217;m looking at you <a href='https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/' rel="nofollow">@j&hellip;</a><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69573"><a href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60901" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ec62edfb27778a8afa1af1d359f39cb3</guid>
				<title>Juniperfish replied to the topic Jodie Whittaker announced as the new, 13th Doctor in the forum The Thirteenth Doctor</title>
				<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60881</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/' rel="nofollow">@jim4</a> And a D minus for logical fallacy as well.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s just a kids&#8217; show and not worth getting one&#8217;s knickers in a twist about, then being on here getting one&#8217;s knickers in a twist about a female Doctor seems, well, wholly illogical Captain.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll turn my attention to more interesting matters, therefore&#8230;</p>
<p>What will the Capaldi to Whittaker&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69552"><a href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60881" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89447fc80b502dad7d1ae3f58885155d</guid>
				<title>Juniperfish replied to the topic Jodie Whittaker announced as the new, 13th Doctor in the forum The Thirteenth Doctor</title>
				<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60878</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:56:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of me cannot be bothered to engage with the one-off sign-ups who&#8217;ve joined to froth about the Doctor regenerating in a female body. But another part of me feels they should be anwered, publicly, despite the present age&#8217;s penchant for &#8220;edgy&#8221; ironic/ post-ironic trolling.</p>
<p><a href='https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/' rel="nofollow">@jim4</a> whatever the truth of your nostalgic vision of early Who as for&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69548"><a href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60878" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cff1d0cfc561b59d279f96c7f03b39d2</guid>
				<title>Miapatrick replied to the topic Jodie Whittaker announced as the new, 13th Doctor in the forum The Thirteenth Doctor</title>
				<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60866</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:13:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/' rel="nofollow">@Jim4</a> &#8211; what about mums, and indeed, non parents?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also confused about your monsters comment. One thing you can say about Moffart, he&#8217;s created new monsters. Lots of new monsters. More perhaps than any single writer for Doctor Who.</p>
<p>Just look at the last season. Daleks are compulsory if they ever want to use them about, but they were used&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69536"><a href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60866" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a2135067af5d6f1c99044d111631fb65</guid>
				<title>Nick replied to the topic Jodie Whittaker announced as the new, 13th Doctor in the forum The Thirteenth Doctor</title>
				<link>https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60865</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:12:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/members/jim4/' rel="nofollow">@jim4</a></p>
<p>Welcome. I&#8217;m afraid, it&#8217;s seems you have missed out over the years. Doctor Who has always been an adventure in liberalism. It&#8217;s in the show&#8217;s DNA. Let&#8217;s face it, 1963 and 2017 are worlds apart in terms of what is or isnt possible for a whole bunch of people. The one thing this programme has done since 1966 is change. It would still be being&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69535"><a href="https://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/forums/topic/jodie-whittaker-is-the-new-thirteenth-doctor-on-doctor-who/page/3/#post-60865" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>