• @PhaseShift

    It’s definitely a difficult subject. As an adult (without children of my own, who grew up in the 1970’s and 1980’s) I definitely find the topic of violence more concerning than sex. I pretty much […]

  • @Whisht

    Jacqueline Pearce doesn’t mention that here (this seems the best of the immediate google searches I found)

    http://www.kaldorcity.com/people/B7jpinterview.html

    Given the time its an obvious […]

  • @Phaseshift

    a couple of things II want to pick up on.

    Series 3/4. I think I’d agree that the casting changes at the end of series 2 wasn’t the factor that drove the decline. The crew ensemble in series 3 (at […]

  • Nick replied to the topic The Next Doctor

    I actually rewatched this a couple of months ago as BBC World Entertainment (or whatever they call it) showed it a few months ago (for the first time locally in Dubai). Definitely a tale of two halves – first half is great. The second half is amongst the worst Who ever (I’m probably only slightly exaggerating my opinion). It was also the first…[Read more]

  • @Whisht

    Hi there. Glad my memory wasn’t completely wrong for once. Wonder if that was the only occasion ? They look fairly expensive props so you’d expect them to be used more than once.

  • @Phaseshift

    Thanks as ever. I never knew about the star trek link. By the way, wasn’t the Federation Security Guard uniform (or at least the helmet) reused in Who ? I certainly recall seeing the helmet design elsewhere.

  • A fantastic show from my teenage memories. I remember series 1 and 2 as excellent, 3 going down hill and 4 as pretty forgettable apart from he last episode. Blake, Avon and Villa were certainly the most memorable […]

  • Nick commented on the post, ALT-WHO – 2.2 – The Chase

    Jim

    Thanks again/ Looking forward to see where you take it next. Doctor/Master would work as older/younger Brother as well.

    One question for you. There were three Tardis’ with one occupied by the Master. Are […]

  • Nick replied to the topic Day of the Daleks part 2

    @Jimthefish

    Conceptually I rather like the idea that the Daleks couldn’t really be bothered to deal with their slave functionary (ies presumably) in “person”; it makes sense to me that they would have total disdain for their slaves, that they prefer to spent their time on their X-box equivalent playing Call of Duty (insert your favourite here)…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic Day of the Daleks part 1

    One question though

    Does anyone know whether Louis Marks chose near eastern names for the guerillas for a symbolic reason ? (Anat, Boaz, Shura, and Monia are all Hebrew or Arabic in origin)

  • Nick replied to the topic Day of the Daleks part 1

    @Jimthefish

    starting with Remembrance of the Daleks or can you take UNIT back further than the 1950s ? (mind you that was a deliberate cheat).

  • Nick replied to the topic Day of the Daleks part 1

    @Phaseshift

    Thanks.

    I always thought that Mike Yates character suffered for two reasons:

    a) It was just never quite that well written, probably because they wanted/needed someone who ranked between the Brig and the troops and they didn’t really know how to handle it given the budgetary constraints (A captain would most likely have several…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic Day of the Daleks part 1

    @Phaseshift

    Thanks for the thought. I’m at work currently although I’ll be back in London in early June when (hopefully) the medical profession will commence replumbing the piping in my brain. So far I’ve had 4 years worth of x-ray dosage in 2 months (with more to come) so I’m probably starting to glow a bit.

    I remember taking quite a dislike…[Read more]

  • Nick commented on the post, The Distinction in AG Doctor Who

    @Whyhow

    a debate from a while ago, which got a bit out of hand by focusing on detail and not the overall picture. I won’t reopen it (unless you’d like to 🙂 ). I think you explained your point of view clearly […]

  • Nick commented on the post, Time and The Doctor

    @phaseshift

    LOL – a challenge for sure. I have read most of the better known Who guides produced over the years (Wood/Miles, Parkin, various Howe et al versions, Lofficier starting with Terrance Dicks one in […]

  • Nick replied to the topic On The Sofa (4)

    @Bluesqueakpip

    Thanks you, I won’t bore you with the details, except to say I don’t recommend it as a way to take 3 weeks off work !

    Cheers

    Nick

  • Nick replied to the topic On The Sofa (4)

    @JanetteB @Bluesqueakpip

    Ah, that sounds much more minor than I thought from your description. I have the DVD for Earthshock where the default version plays with new weapons effects instead of the original (better looking but still pretty poor as there’s a limit to how much tinkering they could do to the original). Tinkering around the edges that…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic On The Sofa (4)

    @JanetteB

    That’s an interesting question to raise. On the whole, If I was voting I’d vote for the original almost always. Whilst some of the special effect shots are pretty cringe worthy these days, I think you’d often need to redo significant amounts of other screen time (all the blue screen stuff for example) if you’re going to address the…[Read more]

  • Nick commented on the post, Time and The Doctor

    @Phaseshift @Jimthefish

    Thanks. I need an operation for a proper fix, but I’m back at work while I wait !

    Cheers

    Nick

  • Nick commented on the post, Time and The Doctor

    @Brewski @Jimthefish

    I’m with you both as well. Whilst I think its probably hard to make work, I do and would rather like them to try it out and see if you can make the “educational” historical work in the […]

  • Load More