@Mystery

I don’t know if you intended to insert an example there, but I just checked your post and there was nothing there. If you need help on inserting images, click on the help tab.

I think the example you quote sounds more like a case for David Tennants legal representatives. So unless you intend bringing him into disrepute, it sounds…[Read more]

@mystery

Here’s an example of a Who parody. Making all the names different helps legally. One biggie is also the phone box. Believe it or not, the Police Telephone Box is now copyright of the BBC (hence a normal red phone box here). Also think of Bill & Ted in their ‘normal’ phone…[Read more]

@mystery

I think @wolfweed has covered it with his answer. Fanzines used to thrive on contributions from fan cartoonists who were covered in the parody class. This went up to people like Tim Quinn and Dicky Howlett, who (as I’m sure @wolfweed would agree) were the Masters of the form for Doctor Who Monthly. There is a collection of their work on…[Read more]

Welcome, @mystery If you are intending to do strip cartoons, that means they are likely to be funny and would probably be considered ‘parody‘ (which I guess would be legally sound). (Obviously don’t just title the strip ‘Doctor Who’)

If you meant comic strips  or cartoons that would be straight/serious then that would indeed breach c…[Read more]