• chickenelly replied to the topic Doctor Who News (2)

    Thanks@Phaseshift for the link, yes the 2010 Davison video was just as lovely.  He might be becoming my favourite BG Doctor now….

  • chickenelly replied to the topic On the Sofa (part 2)

    Not sure if this is exactly news, but for those who missed it, I was in Lakeland today and was confronted by a whole big display along the theme of guess what?

    cake

    Here’s the link to the full range with the […]

  • chickenelly replied to the topic Doctor Who News (2)

    …at the bottom of the above page it’s got a comments/opinion section. Oh dear, methinks a lot of abuse might be coming their way…

  • chickenelly replied to the topic Doctor Who News (2)

  • chickenelly replied to the topic Doctor Who News (2)

    …However it could be that Matt regenerates quite quickly in the episode (would that wig hold up to 60 minutes of fan scrutiny?) and it is indeed the Capaldi show…

  • chickenelly replied to the topic Doctor Who News (2)

    @all

    Despite enjoying a conspiracy/bonkers theory as much as anyone on this forum, I can’t help thinking that it is indeed the filming of the Xmas special.  If only for the fact that it would be a huge waste of […]

  • @Blenkisopthebrave

    In the interests of research, I dug out my boxed set to look for said ‘hooded figure’ and I found it.  I see what you mean – curses if only I’d spotted it two years ago, the Grauniad […]

  • chickenelly replied to the topic Doctor Who News (2)

    @Wolfweed thanks for posting the Peter Davison short video for the 2011 fan convention.  I’d never seen it before.  It was wonderfully tongue in cheek and knowing.

    Just off to follow the other links now…

  • @Pedant & @Blenkinsopthebrave

    The Pandorica Opens (or was it The Big Bang)?: who was the hooded figure clearly lurking behind the Pandorica in the British Museum?

    Eh?  I missed that one, that would have been […]

  • I’ll start of by commenting on the end, you know the appearance of he who shall not be named – noooooo!  It was just as bad as I remembered, I stopped watching Who at this point as well.

    This episode was a […]

  • This was a good episode (with overtones of Phantom of the Opera), but agree with the lack of any role for Peri other than a sci-fi Penelope Pitstop.

    Penelope Pitstop

    However, maybe I’ve been too influenced by the AG […]

  • The above post was both informative and entertaining, thank you @Phaseshift.  I can understand why RTD wanted to get rid of the TLs, and why SM is reluctant to bring them back.  Whilst renegade TLs  are easier on […]

  • @Bluesqueakpip the Skarasen truly takes the biscuit as the most rubbish monster I’ve seen yet.  I especially like the fact it is looking into the middle distance – did its eyes move at all?

    That’s what’s so […]

  • @Phaseshift – Oooh I’ve never seen a Lucas-a-like CGI replacement of a monster done on Doctor Who before.  I don’t know if it is heresy or not.  As @Craig mentioned in the intro for the first episode of […]

  • I’m enjoying this story more than the McCoy one.  However all the atmosphere which had built up in the episode was ruined by the rubber monster at the end – I’d actually forgotten about it so it was jarring when […]

  • chickenelly replied to the topic Spoilers

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • Aaah, back to watching classic episodes.  I just caught up with the last episode of  ‘Ghost Light’ and hadn’t got a clue what was going on.  I don’t think the two week break in between helped, but then again […]

  • chickenelly replied to the topic On the Sofa (part 2)

    I’m currently holidaying away from keyboard based computers (ie expect predictive text gibberish) but would like to add my support for the forum and for the lovely shazzbot to make a return.  She could come back […]

  • chickenelly replied to the topic The Next Doctor

    Yes @Pedant, Moff has clearly known for ages if scripts have been written already.  As we’ve all said before (and he says himself) the Moff lies.

    However the most exciting comment, in respect to our site, is […]

  • Load More