• ScaryB commented on the post, ALT-WHO – 2.1 – Galaxy Four

    @Nick

    1966 Hartnell story – the Steel Sky 9aka The Ark) and following 3 episodes dealt with role reversal of masters/slaves with the Monoids and  Humans (with the TARDIS crew indirectly responsible (Dodo’s cold […]

  • janetteB commented on the post, ALT-WHO – 2.1 – Galaxy Four

    I would say the opposite to @Nick. I think that you have done well in caputuring the feel of the earlier stories @JimTheFish. Your stories have also reignited my interest in the early stories. Long overdue for a […]

  • Bluesqueakpip replied to the topic The Faces of the Doctor

    @Nick – I think ‘characterisation’ in Doctor Who is still developing. I don’t remember vast amounts of character development in BG Who beyond the First Doctor slowly becoming ‘The Doctor’, the hero – it was there, but it broadly tended to be the assistant rather than the Doctor.

    The interesting thing, is that RTD and David Tennant don’t really…

    [Read more]

  • ScaryB replied to the topic The Faces of the Doctor

    @Bluesqueakpip @Nick

    I think it’s right that the audience is the unpredictable 4th (wall!) party to the equation and we’ll read into things according to our personal long term and immediate experience (as well as our experience of the show).

    I don’t subscribe to “the Dr HAS to be asexual” camp but I do think he frequently mis-reads signals -…[Read more]

  • Bluesqueakpip replied to the topic The Faces of the Doctor

    @Nick

    It’s really two things. One, you have what the writer/actors/director intended.

    Two, you have what the audience ‘reads’.

    And it’s entirely possible for the audience to pick up a reading that the writer/actor/director didn’t really intend. [We don’t like it, because – quite frankly – it means we didn’t do our job well enough. But it…[Read more]

  • ScaryB replied to the topic The Faces of the Doctor

    Tennant was my way into AG Who, having missed Series 1 for a number of reasons, not least a dose of ARSE – ha! it won’t be the same! Big budget, 2005, they’ll ruin it! 😳  Scheduling was also a problem and I hadn’t hooked into iplayer at that time.

    Xmas special with the Sycorax was OK, New Earth I liked a lot, Girl in the Fireplace blew me…[Read more]

  • Thumbnail@chickenelly @nick

    @chickenelly, everything is up for grabs as far as future episodes are concerned, with the possible exception of Two Doctors ;-).

    Three Doctors is a great way to see 1, 2 and 3 together, […]

  • @shazzbot @nick @bluesqueakpip @JimTheFish

    I just inserted numbers next to the episode titles @shazzbot.

    Yes, dwelling on the “last of the Time Lords” stuff is tired. To be fair, I think SM has stepped back […]

  • wolfweed replied to the topic Spoilers

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • wolfweed replied to the topic Spoilers

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • @Nick re: meaning of Clara Oswin Oswald

    I’d posted above that the meanings (derivation) of these names reference light and God. You replied:

    “Interesting, but I don’t know if it wise to take the name […]

  • thommck replied to the topic The Next Doctor (2)

    @Nick I’m saying time travel couldn’t be used as a weapon because the assumption I had was that all of the fighters were outside of time. A 5th dimension if you like. They can’t travel back in time to change […]

  • freely admit to not picking up much of the detail

    @Nick – okay, but honestly – it does make playing this game with you a bit like trying to play a game of chess with someone who hasn’t spotted that their bishop […]

  • @Nick

    Running with your argument, then I agree Clara ought to have said something along the lines of “you’re familiar” at the beginning of the physic conference call, but I don’t think that’s necessarily […]

  • thommck replied to the topic The Next Doctor (2)

    @Shazzbot Glad you enjoyed it. I’m quite impressed with it myself 😛

    In regards to what @Nick was saying about The Doctor’s Wife. IIRC the Doctor states that the junkyard is in a “Bubble” universe, i.e. it is […]

  • @Nick @Shazzbot

    3. Of course, they may renumber him (new) D0 and start from scratch

    Who: TNG *shudders*

  • Whisht replied to the topic Companions past and present

    ah, ok, @thommck, @shazzbot, @nick….

    In terms of Rose giving the number to Clara, I guess I’m simply thinking Doc10 (or metacrisisDoc) and Rose “simply” jump into Doc 11’s fractured time-scar (rather than […]

  • thommck replied to the topic Companions past and present

    @Nick I think you managed to articulate a bit better what was unravelling and re-ravelling in my head!
    It’s given me an idea for the Hurt Doctor, I’ll put it here (sorry @shazzbot) as I’m staying away from the […]

  • @Nick

    there can be no guarantee that Clara would actually remember exactly who gave her the number of an IT support line even if she met her later on (I wouldn’t – would you ? in the circumstances).

    The […]

  • @Nick, @Bluesqueakpip

    Re: name of the Eleventh’s current companion, Clara Oswin Oswald

    I agree with @Bluesqueakpip that “Clara” is very likely a tribute to Lis Sladen, the actress who played Sarah Jane Smith […]

  • Load More