Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
21 May 2013 at 13:35 #10189
Sorry, wasn’t his tomb from his death by the GI’s actions? By visiting it, has he not changed the time and location of his own death?
His death (and tomb) at Trenzalore happened in Eleven’s future (when he may be Eleven or a future incarnation) but he visits the site (in tNotD) after it’s happened. Agree with @bluesqueakpip that it’s being heavily suggested that the Dr who died at Trenzalore (before tNotD) is Eleven.
His death may or may not have been influenced by the GI. In which case it may or may not be changed by Clara. We won’t know till we see what they see when they come out of his timestream and back to “reality” on Trenzalore.
Could have a great 50th show mucking about in his timestream revisiting past glories/defeats/glories ( 🙂 )
21 May 2013 at 13:22 #10187@scaryb — you’ve just made a point that I forgot to. With Clara, Moffatt has actually created the ultimate DeM. And I’m sure meant to be a riposte to all the ‘fans’ who scream DeM at the most incorrect points.
Kind of funny, no?
Oh, most definitely

And we have a literal Ghost in the Machine as well 😈
Ha! No wonder they’ve given us 6 months to think about it – we’ll need it! Every scene you look at unpacks to being MUCH bigger on the inside
21 May 2013 at 13:21 #10186@jimthefish @Phasehift re riffing on Whispermen
They’re largely dressed like Simeon and have teeth like the GI’s Snowmen. (JimtheFish)
That’s because they are Simeon, or the GI anyway. I doubt they have any independent life at all, they are controlled by/are the GI. (Scene when Simeon tears his face off, dissolves and is instantly remoulded in the adjacent Whisperman (it’s like walking about with your own spare parts in tow, LOL. They’d make a fortune in the music halls).
There’s very little that’s new re stories, never mind sci fi ones, so everything is influenced by what has come before. That’s part of the fun of it. The interesting thing for me is what changes are made eg Whispermen are in some ways the opposite of the Gentlemen. The Gentlemen steal voices, Whispermen arguably put voices in your head – they cause trouble by spreading runours and information in whispers. (Well, and that Judge Death thing they do of reaching in and squeezing your heart to death. Eeek!)
And yes, both riffed on all the old Dracula and Hammer stories, Victorian “penny dreadful” comics etc etc
In coming up with the Angels, Silence, Vashta Nerada Moffat has also shown a remarkable imagination for completely original “monsters”
What about eg the Pandorica though – which looks like what we saw is GI influenced. Did we see the finished version of that story ie the Clara-amended one? That’s what I mean when I say that we don’t necessarily know which version we as the viewer saw. (It (probably!) doesn’t matter, but it’s interesting when you follow the strands through. And incredibly confusing, LOL)
21 May 2013 at 13:00 #1018121 May 2013 at 12:59 #10180@blenkinsopthebrave Sounds good; also fits with sofa discussions the other day. OTOH some phrases are too good to lose 🙂
btw Just noticed I rechristened the Qantas club lounge – so it’s really Quantum, hmmm.
Sweet dreams <waves to Kennedy theory>
21 May 2013 at 12:54 #10179There has to be at least 3 versions of events (as we are shown in the show – hence the choice of director using the same sets of clips, some with Clara, some with Simeon) –
1 the “original” ie what Clara is aiming to reset to
2 GI amended
3 Clara’s reset
Otherwise the show is undermined dramatically if all previous is down to actual DEM (ie Clara) and nothing to do with the Dr. So long as there is an original version to be overwritten there’s not a probem, even if that “original” no longer exists (has been overwritten)
<goes back to stroking new pet meta ref re the 60s reconstructions>
21 May 2013 at 12:11 #10168All interesting thoughts. See my posts just above (#10164 and #10166) re my thoughts on how and what changes. And esp re why I think (that dramatically) there has to be an “original” timeline, the blueprint. But we don’t know which we’ve seen.
re ClaraPrime – what happens to her – we don’t know yet. She fainted (in good old-fashioned companion style 🙂 ) just before JH made his speech – the Dr picks her up (as he did with Amy right at the start of this series in AotD (see poster)) and will presumably bring her out of his timestream. ClaraPrime only has a limited amount of time that she can survive, though with the Dr there that presumably helps her survival chance.
The 50th could be about them trying to find the way out of his timestream, or it could start assuming they already have.
There’s presumably also scope for odd bits of GI to be lurking in dark, forgotten corners…
Re Hartnell and the Tardis – the Tardis’s influence on which one the Dr runs away with/she steals could be as simple as closing her doors (once he’s in). If she hadn’t liked him she wouldn’t have left with him 🙂 And she could easily be colluding with Clara telepathically to make sure the Dr finds her
21 May 2013 at 11:05 #10166OTOH he has to be careful with this reset switch or he’s going to get bogged down in a whole new set of problems! Agree that what we have seen is probably the original – but not necessarily.
eg Pandorica/Big Bang is clearly GI driven, surely, as the rumours and the words used are the same as the ones the GI says directly to the Dr in NotD. So – as this ended up in a Dr victory – is that something he did himself, was it Clara-driven, or has Clara changed it since we viewed it? Or was it Clara’s influence which maybe affected Amy’s dreams of her raggedy man? Or was it just GI driven but in the “real world” not from fiddling in the timestream?
If Kovarian hadn’t heard the rumours and stories about bad Dr (not as in Hurt Dr!) would the whole River plot have come about?
Where does all that leave Amy and Rory in this alternative timeline? And River?
<aaaaaaagh! my head needs a lie down!!>
21 May 2013 at 10:50 #10165Moffatt hasn’t erased the last 50 years but he has negated their gravitational pull on the future…
How did you manage to sum up in 1 sentnece what I’ve been trying to say in 3 posts!!
Grr 😉
Beautifully put
21 May 2013 at 10:48 #10164most of his life isn’t a fixed point
I think that’s debatable. My understanding of a “fixed point” is that it has to be fixed for the desirable future to happen. If it’s changed, a different future happens. It’s not that they can never be changed – everything can be changed – as the Dr showed in Waters of Mars – but the consequences of the change may not be good for us. After the GI starts altering the Dr’s timeline we see stars go out, the death of Jenny and eversion to type of Strax.
For me, for this change to work (been thinking about it a bit more since my earlier post), then there has to be a sense that there was an original timeline where the Dr won his victories fair and square. By himself. Otherwise he’s emasculated and all his victories and achievements are down to Clara’s interventions.
However, what is wide open to debate is whether what we, the viewers, have seen the “original” or Clara’s retconned version. As @phaseshift and @bluesqueakpip both mentioned – what do you mean no Exxilon daleks left? there are now! It’s going to drive the continuity-obsessives compleetely bonkers, LOL
MEGA META-REF – all those 60s episodes which are missing or have been reconstructed using audio, still pics and animations 😀
21 May 2013 at 10:29 #10161I don’t want to be…well…a pedant…but I think you mean Chekhov’s gun.
Not all information passes through the portals of the Quantum Club lounge I see. Ref an extremely long tussle, sorry – discussion on the G-blog a couple of weeks ago (JttCotT I think) which involved many definitions and disagreements about the uses of DEM and Chekhov’s Gun tropes in the episode (you can check it out, or if you’re wise, leave it your imagination – many good posts were lost that day!!). Chekhov’s duck was born from the wreckage

Incidentally – any takers for my suggestion of Webley for NiS’s Chekov’s gun…?!

<got coat, going! >
21 May 2013 at 10:13 #10159Agreed re Eleventh Hour. Or possibly 12th hour but that doesn’t work so well, LOL. We are only halfway through this story. I suspect more gamechanging afoot 🙂 I’m sticking with my theory (pretty safe bet now) that by the end of the 50th all the sticky little problems from the backstory inc no of regenerations etc will be dealt with and resolved. Probably with an equally tantalising set of questions in their wake!
And good point re Susan inventing the word TARDIS while translating it into English.
Is Tardis really in the OED? *proud*
21 May 2013 at 10:09 #10158@Shazzbot and others wanting to see how Clara and the GI make changes
1 of the reasons could be that it could be very boring, and to work well I also think you’d need to know the stories well to get over how subtle it could be. Yes, it could be physical, like moving a boulder so the Dr has something to hide behind later, but I think a lot of it would be much more subtle.
All the GI’s changes in the Dr’s timestream could be down to whispering in the right ears – people suddenly thinking of a name or an idea, seemingly out of nowhere, hearing rumours, suddenly deciding not to go to a particular place at a particular time because they had a “feeling” about it, being distracted at a crucial moment because of a buzzing in their ears, infiltrating computer systems etc. Clatra’s input could be similar, especially if she has the Tardis helping telepathically to guide her to “where she has to be”.
Words and whispers are a theme of this episode. The Whispermen – extensions of the GI, no eyes, ears, nose – just mouths (and teeth!). They (ie the GI) set things in motion by whispering to Clarence which he passes on to Vastra. We know from the Troughton stories that the GI is familiar with the astral plane, so it’s not surprising he could infiltrate the conference call.
The Name of the Doctor is about the words, and the words people say about you – ie your reputation – and the power that has, for good or bad.
21 May 2013 at 09:37 #10154Love both your posts, I think you’ve picked out the intricacies of this really well.
I think we’re safe to assume that Moffat goes with the “time is a big ball of…” etc since he was the one that started it, in Blink and has made several referances to it being non-linear
I hadn’t picked up on the full implications of how often it would be repeated – that explains Clara’s “I’ve always done it”. Or not repeated at all! OTOH the Dr has been shown on several occasions to be “outside time” in some ways, because he’s a time traveller (and I loved the way Matt spoke about him being probably the most time-travelled being ever) – so does he have a sense of an “original” blueprint sort of thing?
GI changes something, echoClara fixes it – does it change to the way it was before the GI changed it or does it change to something else, still a victory, but achieved in a different way? (If it’s been changed a million different ways at different points, that could drive him completely bonkers! So for that reason maybe I’d lean more to davemorris316’s theory of nothing’s changed!)
But the brilliance of it is that it retcons everything and nothing! Hartnell stole the correct Tardis because he always has. We saw Clara being hooked up telepathically to the Tardis (to get the co-ordinates) – that link could still be there in some form, so it’s not unbelievable that the Tardis could help her telepathically.
We know the GI works with whispers – it’s how he/it got hold of Simeon (footnote – love how loads of people were moaning about Richard E being underused in the Snowmen – and he only comes back as one of the biggest bads ever).
It’s also incredibly cheeky. Deus Ex Machina resolution to stories? Well, yes, actually, very possibly!
20 May 2013 at 20:26 #10101When does River get to know the Doctor’s name? When does she learn the significance of it, and how important it is to keep it secret?
It’s extremely important – it’s his password! Probably uses the same one for his bank accounts and emails 😉
PS re “So, if the river of time can be bent into a pretzel,…” Pretzel shape and texture is much like my brain at the moment!! 😯
20 May 2013 at 20:24 #10100LOL @badwulf re facial hair. It’s as persuasive as anything else. But just to throw something else into your mix – the Master also had facial hair…!
20 May 2013 at 20:19 #10098@Shazzbot Steven with a v if you can trust wikipedia
Agree HurtDr could’ve been behind the mental block (go Shazzbot, LOL – that’s my thinking Fez wot done that 🙂 )
But why no sign of future incarnations? Why does Clara confirm they stop at 11? (and thanks for the instructions – will have a shot. Prob nothing in it, but I’m intrigued now!)
@jimthefish – given that the 50th is supposed to be cinema release also, big budget could be there… you would hope! And if HurtDr is rehablitated – where does that leave us on regens? And how are we ever going to work out who to call Who if 10 becomes 11, 11 becomes 12…. ?! 😉
20 May 2013 at 19:43 #10086Trenzalore, not Gallifrey…. unless the two are one and the same?….
That’s what I wondered, a bit upboard, but I don’t know how to do a screen grab from iplayer to compare…
HurtDr at the end – we are still inside the Dr’s timestream yes? (The comment about there’s only me (and why aren’t there loads of people and events crowded into his timestream?) ) Yet he appears to be looking out on the Trenzalore graveyard…
(Re HurtDr – Eleven says “I said he was me. I didn’t say he was the Dr”)
20 May 2013 at 19:40 #10084@satsumajoe I may be mis-reading you in which case I apologise – River/Dr = Complicated – but by the time River gets to the Library she’s already had her full relationship with Matt, and any future incarnations of the Dr!
Btw – does anyone know how to do a screen grab from iplayer?
20 May 2013 at 19:31 #10082@jimthefish – cool avatar btw 😉
NotD has a few interesting refs to regenerations, well, no of Drs anyway
Clara definitely refers to Hartnell as the beginning (tho admittedly that could be just of he adventure).
But she also says (at the end) – just after they’ve found HurtDr – “But I saw all of you… 11 faces, all of them you, you’re the eleventh Dr”
He doesn’t disagree with her. So given that his timestream was supposed to contain his future versions as well (he says so!), where does that leave us? Continuity error…? (Where’s @htpbdet when you need a ce fixed – hope he can join us soon)
20 May 2013 at 19:06 #10077@timeloop – Re the Silence – see my earlier post #10046 (squeals! we’re 10k+ ) re the timey wimey nature of Trenzalore and why the question Simeon asks may not be the question in Dorium’s prediction…
But my ‘Daddy’s Girl’ reference was to the fact that Rory waited for someone who he knew didn’t love him the way he loved her; and in another mirroring bit, River loved the Doctor in much more a way than he could ever love her.
Ah, but Amy also waited, in similar circumstances, thinking she’d been abandoned. And remember the (slightly awkward) conversation in AotD when they clearly demonstrated that their love for each other was pretty much equal. I think the depth of the Dr’s feelings for River is very clear in this episode. He can touch her virtual self physically. She’s the one who “always knows”, he didn’t want to revisit her in the Library because it would hurt too much but that “you’re always here to me”. She says it’s hard to leave when they haven’t said goodbye, and the only way she’d accept (a goodbye from him) is “if you ever loved me then say it like you’re going to come back”. And he does. She gives him the get-out so he can keep up the facade and not break down. You want more evidence? When have you ever seen Eleven instigate a kiss before? (and in front of other people – even tho they could only see half of what was going on!) The Dr’s at least 300 years older than he was when he left her in the Library, but he’s clearly still carrying a very big torch for her (and not the one he dropped in the underbelly of the Tardis!). <sniff> That’s about as honest and raw as you ever see the Dr get re personal feelings.
@satsumajoe technically it’s not River’s first meeting with him (in SitL), it’s her last (physically anyway), his first!
But yes, 10 in the Library (we think!) is a poignant ref to it<dammit, there’s a lot grit flying about today!
>20 May 2013 at 17:45 #10062@Shazzbot – oops sorry about your name – shit typing skills! You should’ve seen what I called Phaseshift once 🙁 (I think your dog suits the fez down to the ground, LOL (very cute))
Sorry, am still not convinced they are inside, though it’s difficult to work out the scale and the exterior shots of the giant Tardis don’t help. They could be on the window ledge – but the light source is coming from inside. But then the doors being where and how they are don’t make sense. (19.50-21.36 approx)
20 May 2013 at 16:41 #10054@Shazzbit
Ahh, but which console room…
OK I could go with it being a spare… But what about the crack in the window pane?
(River – and her mum’s – the original “girl who waited” 🙂 )
20 May 2013 at 16:33 #10051Could it look like outside
It could, but the floor is very earthy, leaf strewn, and you can see the mountains and sky in the background. And it matches with the later scene when all of them appear to be outside and the Dr appears suddenly.
Re inner and outer doors –
There’s never been a double entrance as far as I remember – you always came straight through the doors into the console room.
It’s odd I tells ya!!!
20 May 2013 at 16:28 #10050@Shazzbot I think you’re spot on with that description of how the Moff (nah! I do’t do formal!) works – fits in with interviews. I think there’s often a long term plan, not necessarily detailed but key points which can be picked up when needed (in individual stories if he wasn’t the showrunner).
I agree that was probably River’s goodbye in terms of post library River (although it was she who kept the link to Clara open (so she was able to confirm to the recovered Dr that Clara was still alive in his timestream (must be like having someone rummage through your diary, only worse!) ) so she could also be the one to actively disconnect it. Though the whole conversation about I can only go if you say goodbye like it’s not the end (paraphrased) and a time to live, a time to sleep does suggest that she finally let go. OMG, that woman can wait – 300 years for a kiss – takes after her parents obv.
But there’s absolutely no reason (as I’ve said before) why an earlier River can’t drop in and out of stories, if the writers find a good way to use her. There will always be the poignancy of her end lurking about, even more so now.
20 May 2013 at 16:15 #10046Just saw an interesting post on the G blog – someone remembered that Clara was plugged into the Tardis. I got excited, then remembered it was early on, so the Tardis could get the co-ordinates that Clarence (the convict) had given them. But even so… she’s been directly connected up once.
I’ve watched a few times and there is definitely a mismatch between the Dr & Clara exploring deep in the Tardis, where we are told the dimensionality(?) is unstable (and OK, and am now convinced Clara saying “we’ve done this before” is a ref to JttCotT (wonder if she remembers being incinerated…? And was that epsidode GI influenced?) and the Dr appearing in front of Dr Simeon. Outside.
Agree with the poster above, there is also a mismatch with the Pater Gang when the first “land”. It looks like outside, but the Tardis Police Box sign is definitely the wrong way round, suggesting inside. or a reflection. And why would the GI need the Dr to open the doors if they were already inside?
And yes, it is intriguing that the Tardis is in the new console room configuration, complete with the cracked window that it’s just acquired. Maybe the final battle IS sooner than we think.
Talking of which – this arrival at Trenzalore is not necessarily the one predicted (although I do like the catch on “Fall” being te tardis crash landing). Since the Dr’s grave – ie the decaying, dying Tardis, complete with “scar tissue” timestream – is definitely here, he has already “fallen”.
BUT if the Trenzalore defeat was down to the GI, how is that affected now that Clara has gone on her rescue mission? We’ve not stepped out of the Dr’s timestream yet, we don’t know what outside looks like yet.
Mad random thought – what if Trenzalore used to be Gallifrey??
@bluesqueakpip Re the Dr’s childminding skills – take them on an adventure? He can’t even play blind man’s buff in their own house without losing them! How does this man ever manage to defeat daleks, cybermen and whathaveyou?! (The scariest monsers in the universe aren’t half as devious as 2 human kids!):-)
Yup, think there’s lots of mysteries to be solved yet
20 May 2013 at 13:50 #10002The psychology of blog-boards is fascinating – but long exposure is probably not healthy 😉
@jimthefish I look forward to reading your thoughts on this and the internet in general.
When’s it November?

<aagh! I shouldn’t be wishing my life away at my time of life, LOL>
20 May 2013 at 10:07 #9976@whohar It’s a great comment (over there) but I really really mean it – feeding only encourages them. They will ALWAYS come back for the final comment, it’s what they love. If you don’t feed them they don’t go away but they don’t take up half a page of comments. (And no, I rarely take my own advice but I’m trying really really hard this time!) 😉
@bluesqueakpip *proud of you* 🙂
20 May 2013 at 08:45 #9965For info, there’s screen shots and info about the sources of all the previous Doctors here
20 May 2013 at 08:36 #9962@whohar Completely agree, with the additional reminder that we are an open forum. In our defence it was a particularly bruising weekend. Many of the comments have disappeared (the replies linked to the ones that get modded) – so it’s ultimately a waste of time. DON’T FEED THE TROLLS (inc on here) – it’s hard, but it only encourages them. <pins big post-it note to computer>
@janetteb That’s a great idea for the anniversary. You can add red wine and champagne too
And big luminous blue fruit (you may have to go to Akhaten market for those)20 May 2013 at 00:52 #9946he obviously doesn’t get to see really high quality theatre.
I suspect he doesn’t get out much at all!
OK it’s a low shot at stereotypes (aren’t they all hehe) – But he has found paragraphs this week 🙂
20 May 2013 at 00:44 #9944<waves @blenkinsopthebrave> Wild night in the old Club Lounge then? Ah, you just can’t get the staff these days!

Interestingly I haven’t noticed Omega’s name come up (or the Other) – could’ve missed it tho ; Valeyard’s been mentioned as you’d imagine. Concensus seems to be that it’s most likely “the incarnation we don’t talk about” between 8 and 9. But could be before Hartnell, or a future Dr.
Hope you enjoyed it as much as most people in here seem to have done. I loved the rewriting the Dr’s timeline gamechanger was brilliant – and how much does that open things up?!!, squeeing at John Hurt and sniffled an ambarrassing amount over River.
20 May 2013 at 00:37 #994120 May 2013 at 00:21 #9937@wolfweed – LMAO at Genesis pic – you do come up with them! You’ll need to post some more on the Captions thread, once the mad specialtion of this weekend dies down.And thanks for the post with the lnk to the poster man – I think @craig also posted that a few days agao, but it’s definitely worth repeating. That would come close to my dream job, I think… if only I could draw!
@ardaraith – it’s a very dangerous place to visit after Sunday mornings, LOL. Aliens in the wifi – there are indeed! @Shazzbot – yeah, I saw that one as well. <note to self, and anyone else who wants to listen: DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!!!> And lets leave them on that side of the watery portal.
20 May 2013 at 00:14 #9934Agh! You caught me out on my ignorance of these things. I blame @phaseshift – he keeps talking about blog rolls hehe
Btw – is it still a ship if it happens in episode? (I can’t believe how much my vocabulary has increased over this series 😉 )
While we’re on the subject – what about River?! That woman waited 300+ years just for a wee snog!
Female Dr? ha! I still think it’d be worth it just to watch the reaction on the blogs, LOL. Some of them can’t even handle a female companion being pro-active.
On the subject of BBC “suits” – I would have every faith in Moffat to get that past them. Picture the scene as he presents the “OK the next couple of episodes are going to basically wipe out 90% of the established history of the programme” concept (of the finale and 50th) to them –
Moff: It’s brrrilliant – Tennant and Piper have signd up for the finale!!
BBC Suit : £££ 😀
Moff: And we’re bringing back a fan fave baddie, a new one…
BBC suit: ££ 🙂
Moff: … who’s going to jump into the Dr’s timestream and change everything, but it’s OK because the Impossible Girl – who’s going to be an absolute winner with the Dads – jumps in and resets it all again.
BBC Suit:?
Moff: And we’ve got Tennant and Billie lined up for the 50th with daleks and cybermen.. and zygons!!
BBC Suit; £££ 🙂
Moff: And… the best thing of all is we’ve got John Hurt… for definite, no kidding.. JOHN HURT!
BBC Suit: £££££££ 😀
19 May 2013 at 21:49 #9898We don’t have a blog-roll on here at present.
You’ve been offline for a while, haven’t you???!
19 May 2013 at 21:41 #9895@Shazzbot – we didn’t see what the GI did to affect things, but we see the effects – Jenny dead cos no Dr to save her, Strax doesn’t get his epiphany, stars going out etc (ie the Wonderful Life moment). And the Doctor on the floor with the agonies it’s causing him (painful process getting your timeline rewritten). You know that the multi-Clara solution works because again we see the effects.
Much of what the GI does could be done with whispers eg the Dr’s reputation going downhill as in AGMGtW. Clara could fix it equally with whispers or, as you suggested, making sure a boulder was in right place at right time. But I do think it would be tedious (and technically laborious) to go through several examples. It’s not the detail of this that’s important, it’s the results.
And I strongly suspect Moff of adding in a huge tease – as I’ve said before – we (audience) can never know re old episodes if we are watching what originally happened or if it’s the post Clara version, which may or may not be subtly different from the original timeline.
19 May 2013 at 21:26 #9891@juniperfish – your wish is my command 🙂
(for a little while anyway, in honour of River and the superb Alex Kingston) Thanks for the Smokey song (yes, very apt) and also belated thanks to @wolfweed for the Kate Bush track – I think that might actually be THE saddest video I’ve ever seen 😥
@phaseshift @Shazzbot Could get pretty boring running through the specific instances Clara changed the GI’s sabotage, especially if you don’t know the original stories. You’d need to do a lot of setting up to make it pay off. You see how it’ll work with the Hartnell scene, the rest is up to your imagination if you want to go there.
There’s 2 gamechangers, one looking back, the other to the future – the GI/Clara retconning the canon (to get a bit jargony about it) and the reveal that there is another incarnation that we knew nothing about, but who is so dark he cannot even be given the name The Doctor.
19 May 2013 at 20:50 #9887Has anyone watched our thank you video present from the Who team yet btw? Smith and Tennant chatting about their experiences of being the Doctor. Would love to see the outtakes when they are being shall we say, less diplomatic (about the 11%). Fun http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006q2x0
19 May 2013 at 20:39 #9883@rema <cheerfully chucks ganger doc theory out the window>
Who needs ganger Dr when we’ve got John Hurt!! (not to mention Smith and Tennant ALL in the same episode!!)

@juniperfish Dark Dr theory vindicated 🙂 Jury out on interconnectng timelines till November. Keeping both my bow ties in place meanwhile
19 May 2013 at 20:36 #9882@jimthefish I did wonder that about Clara, but there again “our” one is clearly idenitfied as the original. She wasn’t supposed to get back out again, but the Dr did the heroic thing 😥 So she’s the pattern, and probably enhanced by this experience and from being in the Dr’s timestream/paradox-ridden tardis, but she’s not been the consciousness of the 1m copies.
19 May 2013 at 19:58 #9874@jimthefish Thanks for your support. Not a prob – I was having fun

I stick to my point about Shakespeare tho

And yes… <jumps up and down in excitement> Hi to @danmartinuk You finally made it – it’s harder to get in here than to get thro a watery portal guarded by Ming the Merciless… oh, wait a minute…! I trust you have been thoroughly frisked for spoilers?!
19 May 2013 at 18:44 #9862@KurtCobana Because his name IS “The Doctor”. Or at least the only name he acknowledges. The one he chose for hmself. As certain human cultures do – once you have gone through a right of passage around puberty – you choose or are given a name which is supposed to relate to the qualities you have and/or value. The Name of the Doctor translates as The Reputation of the Doctor – something which he sees as something to be aspired to and much more important than a combination of letters of symbols.
19 May 2013 at 18:18 #9857Hugh Lloyd 😀
Can’t find a short copy of this, but if you want to dip into a bit with HL go to 17.00 (But no apologies for posting the whole thing, still sounds remarkably fresh and sharp to my old ears (first broadcast Jun 1961))
19 May 2013 at 18:09 #9853I wouldn’t be surprised if Moff wanted to close off her story before the 50th and, in his words “start something new”.
Well that’s it then. You have just killed my whole reason to exist. I’m never ever ever watching the show again. But I shall continue to come back in here and wind up everyone on this blog as often as I can!
<is about to storm off in an almighty huff when she suddenly remembers she’s not in the Dark Place any more! Ooops 😈 >
19 May 2013 at 17:57 #9851<waves chirpily @everyone then flops on the sofa>
Just back from the G-blog – that’s it, I’m done with it for now. Why do people get so angry on there? I’ve had times in my life when I didn’t even think about Dr Who (I know, I know!), times when I didn’t like the current Dr or companion (don’t ANYONE mention M** (sorry @htpbdet 😉 )) so I didn’t watch. Dipped in and out till one came along that I liked again. But I don’t remember ever getting angry about it not conforming to my own expectations.
Noticed at least half a dozen of my posts have gone from last night – collateral damage. Shame, I was kinda proud of a couple of them. But the downright rude insults to @bluesqueakpip have gone.
@miapatrick Big glasses – I know, tell me about it, LOL
One thing that did occur to me while over there (in the dark place!) – I bet Shakespeare got his fair share of schtick for mucking up established canon – he was never one to let that sort of thing get in the way of a good story. Wonder if incensed Scots leaving the opening production of Macbeth threatened to burn down the Globe, and bring in one of those nice young playwrights Mr Bacon or Mr Marlowe instead 😉
19 May 2013 at 14:53 #9828Thanks for posting that beautiful Troughton speech (sleep in my head) and the connection of 11 saying to River “a time to live and a time to sleep”
😥
19 May 2013 at 14:51 #9827@drwho River’s grave at Trenzalore is a fake; the Dr knows she can’t be buried there, because he knows how she “died”, in SitL. How it got there is a bigger question of course, though it could be put down to Clara’s influence, and general timeywimeyness – the “now” of this episode being overloaded with paradoxes, anything could happen. Re Clara’s comment about going into the Dr’s timestream – “I’ve always done it”
19 May 2013 at 14:46 #9825@satsumajoe No, I don’t think Tennant’s Dr is dark enough in the same way.
Gallifreyan Clara as the Corsair – Love it!!
19 May 2013 at 14:40 #9822@jimthefish – re the continuity bores – ha ha, don’t expect them to go quietly 😈
-
AuthorPosts


