Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
10 August 2013 at 15:20 #15864
What was Peter Davison’s joke (or possibly the scriptwriters joke) about BG Who versus AG Who? The Championship versus the Premier League.
Very much his I think, the way it was delivered in the Proms (reminder people – August Bank Holiday for the televised version).
I think I’ve heard Tom Baker, Peter Davison and Sylvenster McCoy all express a little envy about the opportunities the role offers these days, and frankly who wouldn’t. It is a different world. All point to the expanded range and scripts that dare go into places the old series didn’t feel comfortable in.
But so far, you don’t re-make a TV programme unless you’re moving countries.
It is odd. With a couple of exceptions (largely “classic lit” tales) it’s unheard of. I really enjoyed the restaging of the Quatermass Experiment in 2005 on BBC4, attempting to capture the “live” feel of the original (I have the original on DVD, albeit with the obligatory missing episodes problem). It occurred to me that the forthcoming “Adventures in Space and Time” could be used as an experiment to remount a couple of the lost tales from the Hartnell era. I’ve read a couple of reports from people who have seen extracts from it, and who I normally find a bit cynical. They seem to be uniformly hailing David Bradleys turn in it. Something to look forward to.
10 August 2013 at 12:09 #15852but am I the only one who finds the much-celebrated Ace and Dalek with baseball bat scene really irritating?
No – I’m with you 100% on that one. Deeply irritating on so many levels.
10 August 2013 at 12:08 #15851I think I said when it was suggested that we watch Ghostlight that I would welcome it. It would be very easy for us to compile a watch list of fan classics for older fans to bore people with eulogising posts on how great it all was, while people unfamiliar with the material struggled to see it.
Happily – we are the Doctor WHo Forum, and have not gone into that territory. Talons saw criticism even though it is a touchstone “classic”. Ghostlight divides more fans, and perhaps gives the viewer an insight into how frustrating an experience it was to be a fan at this point. Doc 7 and Ace were a great pairing. Sylvester does give an intriguing turn as the Doctor at this point. I’d suggest that the storytelling becomes more oblique, which frustrates some, but I welcomed it.
When I consider this story, I find it easy to see it mounted with the production values and haunted house feeling of something like “Hide”. Wouldn’t that be astonishing? It’s so full of good ideas that the budget and schedule could not accommodate.
9 August 2013 at 19:23 #15794Now this sounds great fun (if a little surprising) and I wish I could get tickets for it.
The Edinburgh Fringe will see a couple of improve events. One features host Fred MacAulay, Frank Skinner and … Steve Moffat.
http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2013/08/08/18449/look_whos_in_edinburgh9 August 2013 at 19:10 #15793I would like to clarify to others that using an expression like “a dreary disastrous dog turd” is not against the rules, or would even offend a Moderator (I feel I have used more robust language on many an occasion). I merely disagreed with your assessment of the actor as a participant in a conversation (which you later asked me to clarify by editing a previous post).
Would you agree?
9 August 2013 at 17:46 #15790@shazzbot (welcome)
Yes, thanks for reminding me. It was on a suggested watch list because a lot of people had it in the Regenerations Box Set (with Talons). It features five, and as much of Six as I want to revisit after my rant on the Faces forum. 🙂
No massive spoilers in it, if you’ve read the nominations for it on our Top50s list, but if you want to remain relatively unspoilt, don’t link.
So much more attractive a look than Colin in a Clown costume. 😉
9 August 2013 at 17:26 #15786@danmartinuk has his next retrospective up on Caves of Androzani.
http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2013/aug/09/the-caves-of-androzani-doctor-who
Talking of Dilemmas (Twin or otherwise), Dan appears to have dealt with the sixth Doctor by subverting the form of his next column:
We’re flip-reversing the list, because we can’t really make a case for any Colin Baker story making the grade. Instead, we’re going to look at Doctor Who at its very worst. Take cover, folks, its Timelash!
What a sensible chap. Good choice. Signs of outrage are small at this point, but some minor storm clouds are gathering.
9 August 2013 at 11:52 #15736Another month, another Doctor in the celebratory range of books. Alex Scarrow tackles the Eighth Doctor, in Spore.
He says:
“I am squeeing like an over-sugared toddler at the thought of being part of this project. Doctor Who is an export this country can be proud of. We OWN time travel. My small part in this project was to breathe life back into the least known, Eighth Doctor, played by Paul McGann. I chose him because I felt I had the most room to manoeuvre, to explore a lesser known Doctor and add flesh to his character. In my story entitled Spore, we’re getting a particularly grisly tale of an intelligent virus that liquifies and absorbs any creature it infects. All in all… quite gross – liquified people an’ all.”
As ever, the Guardian has an extract.
9 August 2013 at 11:48 #15735I really like this. This is the Twelth Doctor in IDW comics style by onegemini (link to deviantart). Post regeneration (in 11s costume). The text is a modified version fom some the Audition scripts that Doctor Who Magazine published recently. Lovely attention to detail, and really caputures that style. The artist also has a lovely combative style in dealing with ARSE-y fans.
5 August 2013 at 21:35 #15500What ho!
Feeling a bit knackered so will be having an early night. I’ll jump in and answer some of the posts directed to me tomorrow.
Just wanted to share this. I remembered it from when Capaldi appeared in Fires of Pompeii and talked about the show to SFX in 2008. They’ve reprinted some of it in a profile today.
“When I was a kid, being a huge Doctor Who fan, I wrote numerous letters to the Doctor Who office largely inquiring about how the show was made.”
It was 1972 and Doctor Who was entering its ninth season on BBC 1.
“I was thrilled to have delivered to me a large package from the BBC containing two full studio scripts for the Jon Pertwee serial ‘The Mutants’, which they were making at the time.
“The package also contained set designs and studio floor plans for these episodes and a delightful letter from [producer] Barry Letts giving me an idea what all this stuff was.
“It was a fantastic exciting insight into both Doctor Who and television production generally. I had never seen a script in any form whatsoever before then and was immediately fascinated by the documents. And of course Barry’s kindness was a trigger to my ambition to work somehow (I didn’t know how) in TV. The scripts are still sitting on my bookshelf downstairs.”What an astonishing (and potentially life changing) gift from Letts.
5 August 2013 at 00:59 #15334and I’m really concerned about the emphasis on American audiences with Doctor Who, ever since 11, Rory, and Amy (and River) shipped up in America to start off that series. Surely the BBC learnt something in tonight’s live programme with the applause for such a ‘British’ show?
Honestly? I think this would be a fascinating topic for a blogpost. As an ex-pat do you think Who is becoming more “Mercinised” I don’t think so. When the Doctor turns up he appears to take the piss out of American Culture as much as the writers want to lampoon Brit culture. Look at IA/DoTM. Doctor: i’m not afraid of your guns. River: They’re Ameicans. Doctor sits down and looks a bit scared. It’s funny parody.
There is a stream of Fans who are annoyed about any “Mercin” interest in the series, and I don’t think we should encourage this without some real perspetive. It is co-produced by BBC America. It’s almost pathological. I don’t think Doctor Who is becoming more Mercinised, but I think their own pop culture has embraced and understood it in a way that it hasn’t before as this clip may make clear. I think this should be celebrated in a way. But some fans seem to think that Americans enjoying Doctor Who is wrong. Pretty Sad.
This is how icons are born – and are re-inforced.
4 August 2013 at 23:41 #15314Fantastic stuff. The DVD has a great interview with Iain Banks when he confesses to “having a moment” about characters he had written for, but seeing the actors they had selected and the way it was done made him revisit it in a very profound way. It’s a great buy if anyone wants a taste of Doctor 12 before series 8. I think elements of “Uncle Rory” will make it into Doc 12.
I think that’s what we are trying to do to be honest. These days he seems to be known for Malcolm Tucker and I think Jim has led the way in pointing out the Crow Road, which is a much more sympathetic “Doctor on your side” feeling. Neverwhere, he is very alien and Machiavellian as Islington, so it shows more sides of his performance that could potentially inform any future Doctor. He’s not just the sweary guy from “Thick of it”.
@pedant and I were discussing Izzard. Izzard as the Corsair. I award you 13 million Doctor Who Forum points (unfortunately redeemable at absolutely nowhere) for that one. What a brilliant idea. x
4 August 2013 at 23:02 #15301Just to say I’m massively delighted about Peter Capaldi. It was an idea that when floated you thought – wouldn’t that be brilliant! Never happen, but wouldn’t it be brilliant.
Well – it’s happening, and I think he will be brilliant.
One thing a lot of people forgot when talking about him is what a massive geek (in a nice way, embracing challenges) he is. Jim posted some stuff from the Crow Road (which anyone should seek out), but remember him in Neil Gaimans “Neverwhere” as the Angel Islington? He knows Neil Gaiman from that frustrating shoot, so I think he may draw more work out of that source.
4 August 2013 at 22:49 #15295yes. Population of Scotland as percentage of total UK population – 8.7%
Population of Scottish Doctors as percentage of total Doctor population – 23.1%
I am going to write that “Doctor Who is thunderously regionalist” joke column for the next regeneration demanging a welsh actor. This is an outrage! 😀
4 August 2013 at 18:35 #15117Weeeell…actually the only I believe Is “required” is 1 nobody should call him Doctor Who because that’s like calling a Dalek a robot
You’d hate the early OFFICIAL novilisations of the stories then. Not only is he called DOCTOR WHO, but it really is presented that way, in print, with CAPS LOCK on. You get bizarre text like.
“Hello Jo. I’m the Doctor”, said DOCTOR WHO.
I think you should possibly find a stone to crawl underneath after those posts.
4 August 2013 at 16:40 #15079only 10 people know who the next Doctor is…
Unfortunately – if one of them is Ian Levine, pandemonium ensues.
4 August 2013 at 14:52 #15058@whisht – no, please do continue with your comments! I’m just doing this to take the piss out of the Liveblog format, and hopefully to inform anyone who can’t see it what they are not missing.
The more the merrier.
I really need to nip of to the shop though. Bonnie Langford – Christ.
4 August 2013 at 14:16 #15053I feel it’s not the quantity of the people who read my posts, it’s the quality. 🙂
To answer your questions
1. Odds on certainty – Probably at the end. when it was announced my Guide showed 30 minutes. Now it shows 35.
2. I reckon about 22 minutes.
3. Naffer.4 August 2013 at 13:47 #1505019:38 I’m spent – and to borrow a Malcom phrase FUCKING DELIGHTED. A great choice that makes me anticipate the next era. Brilliant stuff.

19:30 CELEBRATE – COMISERATE – EXTERMINATE! We have a new Doctor! Rejoice! Rejoice!
19:28 It’s Capaldi!!!!!!
19:26 OOOHHHH! It’s the Moff. “I think it’s time the QUEEN was played by a man”.
19:21 Thank god for Bernard Cribbins. Young people – welcome to the childhood of anyone of my age (40 odd years). Rufus Hound is sincere, but still more than a little bit of an arse.
19:19 Nice montage. “JO – It looks like someone has baked you.” BRUNO – AAARGH!!!
19:15 Zoe has told us the next Doctor is “IN THE BUILDING”. May your rectum prolapse with excitement NOW!
19:11 Matt Smith interview – May I start blubbing now? (in a manly way)
19:09 Liza Tarbuck is available for any event. It’s why she is on this show.
19:04 Mr Davison – His grandchildren. Pity them. Expected Doctor DNA squared.
19:04 Ladies and gentlemen – Zoe Ball. Can you think of any other daughter of a TV maths god who became a radio star and married a famous DJ you’d rather see present something like this?!
That has to stump people.
19:01 5-4-3-2-1 Oh Gods. Welcome to the awful reality of Light Entertainment people!
18:57: Thanks @chickenelly for the link to the competition. Stuart Hetitage what a ****ole. Good luck to him. here’s the link
18:50: Hi all – Only 15 minutes to start. It occurs to me that our overseas people (even those who have the benefit of the simulcast) may have weird conceptions of each others output. I’ve met fellow UK inhabitants who seem to think that all US TV consists of high quality HBO type shows. I’ve met people in the US who think that for people in the UK it’s all Doctor Who, Broadchurch, David Attenborough, etc.
I think all our nations are united in a shared belief that dishing out dross to their public in MASSIVE doses is a good thing. I’m hoping the Doctor show tonight will not be considered in this way, but I think this is a forlorn hope.
I’ve just tuned in to BBC one and I have something with crocodiles and other reptiles which seems on the dangerous “oooh – when those pesky animals attack” territory of the SKY channels. What dross are you watching at the moment?
17:08: I think it’s safe to say that anticipation is reaching fever pitch (in my imagination).
The Royal Family have retired to private chambers to view this special. A courier has been dispatched to inform Her Majesty on who her new protector is.

The Pope has just said : “I thought my election, with the smoke thing, was exciting, but I didn’t get Zoe Ball. I can’t wait to see who 12 is”. What a gent. Probably.
16:34: @jimthefish raises an interesting point about the certainty of the press over Peter Capaldi. Just before Matt Smith was anointed there was a late surge of betting on him to become Doctor 11. Are we to believe that a lot of minor personnel from Cardiff nip in to Ladbrokes to have an insider bet?

16:08: Here’s a funny anecdote. Went into my nearest off-licence and stocked up. As I was paying the manager, I beamed “Who do you think the next Doctor will be”.
He said “Huh?”. Readers will be happy to know that I TCE’d the philistine on the spot and left, without paying, leaving a queue of people horrified in my wake.
Call that customer service? I don’t.
14:48: This frivolity will have to cease for a little while. Having visited the dungeon and checked my booze store I realise I am down to the last six cases of Vodka, and am perilously close to being sober tonight. I feel the need to visit my nearby off-licence. Please support your own local businesses. You’ll miss them when they’ve gone.
You will need:- Alcohol. Lots of.
- Popcorn or blown corn snacks (perhaps Cheesy) to hurl at the screen in disbelief (doesn’t cause as much damage as actually kicking the screen)
14:22: The Guardian is reporting that Tom Baker and Billie Piper will also be in attendance. Is 35 minutes enough? It seems a limited timeframe if Tom is on form and relays an anecdote.
14:09: Many thanks to @thommck for the update at 11:39 on the line-up for tonight’s show.
Peter Davison (the Fifth Doctor) will be there in person and Matt Smith (the current Doctor) and Colin Baker (the Sixth Doctor) will also be contributing.
The marvellous Bernard Cribbins (Wilfred Mott) will be there in person and there’ll be contributions from former companions including Anneke Wills (Polly), Katy Manning (Jo Grant), Janet Fielding (Tegan) and Bonnie Langford (Mel). Writer and actor Mark Gatiss also features in the show by way of a specially recorded video.
Celebrity fans in the studio include Rufus Hound, Liza Tarbuck and from Outnumbered, Daniel Roche. There’ll also be video contributions from Professor Robert Winston, Jo Whiley, Bruno Tonioli and following his appearance in The Power of Three, Professor Brian Cox.A 6 hour warning that the show will contain Bonnie Langford is a valuable public service. I think I’ll just go and check my booze store to see if I have enough. And Bruno Tonioli?! Comparisons with a Strictly LiveBlog look a bit dangerous at this point.
14:02: Is it really only a couple of weeks since Steve Moffat spoke at the SDCC convention and boldly stated that the search for Doctor 12 had “barely begun”? How we laughed.
13:49: Hello one and all. Welcome to the top of page 12, which seems fortuitous. Join me tonight as I attempt to Liveblog the event for those who can’t access the televisual spectacle we have been promised. I’ll be updating this post throughout the day to try to bring home to you the full experience of sitting through a 35 minute BBC Light entertainment extravaganza to find out WHO it will be.
For those of you who are unfamiliar with the “LiveBlogging” concept, I am aiming to recreate the feel of the Guardian. Here is what they do with something like Strictly Come Dancing.
So a mixture of moronic insight, stating the bleeding obvious and pitiful attempts at humour. People who read my usual output (all 2 of you) will not really see any change of style.
4 August 2013 at 13:46 #15049@pedant. Always though Izzard would be a brilliant Doctor. Some of his early screen appearances were a bit rubbish, but you can see him grow to the point where he really does shine in stuff like “The Richies”. Plus – the Doctor arguing with a companion on who has the best dress – what’s not to like in that scenario?
4 August 2013 at 13:46 #15048@juniperfish oooh, commiserations on the tooth. I hope the woozy feeling has been brought on by good old fashioned prescription grade medication. You may be in a perfect place to find tonight enjoyable.
4 August 2013 at 01:21 #15024Many thanks, but I think I’d prefer to develop them through Angels In Manhatten and maybe consider a blogpost after that. I don’t think anyone has suggested this before, so maybe it is just me. I’m just interested in feedback.
4 August 2013 at 00:47 #15020On Angels
One of the things that has always intrigued me is what makes a successful villain in Who. Most understand that the Daleks are a thinly veiled reference to Nazi philosophies. These observations were made before I was born in 1969, so I’ve always seemed to know this. I knew that the Daleks were Nazis before I even understood the full horror of what Nazis represent. Many people have chosen to lampoon Terry Nation for this, his peculiar fixation. Not only the Daleks, but if you watch his Blakes 7 from the seventies the entire concept of the Federation is a Fascist regime. In 1963 – the second world war was a critical touchstone event. The damage it had caused, but more fundamentally the question – “what made them do that?” when considering the full horror of the “final solution”. It was a question and issue that haunted Nation and I can’t begrudge him – I did not grow up informed by that era.
When looking at the Angels, you wonder if there is a real life equivalent to compare them to. Are they, as the Daleks obviously are, a comment on the horrors that humanity seems to breed? I think the answer if yes. For me they represent a more modern fixation. That of the Serial Killer, and the “romantic ideal” that arises out of this peculiar fixation.
I have no love for the form of fiction that glamorises the serial killer, and this is by no means a modern phenomenon. You can call “Jack” the original if you wish, and he’s the most well known, and occurs most often in popular culture. They are, as people say “Big Business”.
When watching Blink, I was stuck by the description “The Lonely Assassins”. It reminded me of something, and I struggled, but I remembered an account of Denis Neilson who once described himself as “The selfless assassin”. A peculiar psychology of these people is to adopt a persona, a absolute belief that what they do makes sense. They are the hunter, you are their prey for a good reason. If only you could understand it.
If you watch their three main appearances, they display all the hallmarks of the form. In Blink by choosing their target (Sally) and haunting/taunting her. Playing with their food. Taking delight in witnessing the damage. Taking from her a friend and a potential partner as she is manipulated towards a goal.
In this one we see them take voice and taunt the voices of Authority (Octavian and the Doctor) with their intention to kill and display glee that those in authority cannot understand their motivations and goals. Pretty common in real life Police cases.
In this there is a comment that to observe an Angel is to become an Angel. In representation, this is almost like possession. How many references can you name that show those who study and observe the behaviour of serial killers may become affected by them – X-Files, Millennium, Bones, It’s a rich vein isn’t it? For me it probably starts in “Manhunter” where Will Graham is tormented by Hannibal Lector (played by Brian Cox, sorry Sir Anthony, he will always be Hannibal for me and Manhunter pisses on Red Dragon).
For me – asking what the motivation and philosophy for the Angels existence is at this point is a pretty dumb question. They are what they are – Alien. They have their own motivations – their own timeframe and their own goals. To dwell on them may be dangerous. This may be frustrating for some who demand those immediate truths, but then these are creatures of the abstract for abstract times. The uncomfortable truth for some is that you will never know why the fiend took your loved ones away from you. You will never understand the foe or their motivation.
They are so very alien.
But the effect is so very real. I don’t need people to agree with me that the Angels “work”. It’s pretty easy to observe. The live prom a few weeks back – I knew when the Angels appeared. It was the biggest reaction from the audience. I’d heard it before on that film from Sidney. Hear the gasp from the audience as the Angels appear.
It really is the stuff of nightmares. If not for you, then for a lot of other people. I see the visage of the Angel on kids lunchboxes with a bit of meloncholy, to be frank. I think they are on the way to becoming modern icons.
3 August 2013 at 21:29 #15010In fact, I enjoyed this even more than the first time. Possibly because a cartoon Graham Norton didn’t wander onto the screen during the gripping final scene of the first part.
Anyone remember that one? I loved his apology on his following show though (@shazzbot – yes, I love Graham too).
3 August 2013 at 21:01 #15008OK I re-arranged things to take in this two parter and watch Ghost Light tomorrow I think.
For me, after Beast Below, this is Moff on confident form and I quite understand @bluesqueakpip here in saying this is perhaps his final “conventional” two parter. Thereafter we are presented with gear changes that subvert the format of the show and expand it a little.
I still find it a little thrilling on rewatch. The intro for River, and the Doctor and Amy phasing into the story is brilliant. The setup for the exploration of the labyrinth is superb and adds layers to the initial encounter in the Library.
The confrontation between Amy and the loop Angel is pretty mindblowing psychological warfare on a young viewer. It says – “you think that screen between you and the monsters is a barrier – think again”. It’s Ringu for kids, as their nightmare comes out of the screen! On primetime TV! Mary Whitehouse would have had a meltdown at this point.
River (reading): “What if we had ideas that could think for themselves? What if one day our dreams no longer needed us? When these things occur and are held to be true, the time will be upon us. The Time of Angels.”
I think this is actually foreshadowing some of the ideas for the last episode. The possibility of dreams and the abstract (and the Angels are described as creatures of the Abstract) becoming form by imagination. This has been criticised but does have some precedents in Who from “The Mind Robber”. What can be imagined can be a reality in some abstract plane.
This really does crack along a pace. The reveal of the statues of the Apolan being Angels is brilliant.
Next ep – Christ – the firefight in the airlock as the clerics gunfire illuminates the Angels advance is stunning. It does remind you of a good action film like Camerons Aliens. Thereafter, its fun. I love the TreeBorgs and the idea of an O2 factory or forest running through the ship. It’s a big idea, delivered in such a casual way.
Lots of channelling of Doctor 7 here. This exchange, you can almost substitute 7 and Ace (as we’re watching Ghostlight)
The Doctor: “Amy. You need to start trusting me. It’s never been more important.”
Amy: “But you don’t always tell me the truth.”
The Doctor: “If I always told you the truth I wouldn’t need you to trust me.”As @craig said, Father Octavian is a brilliant character here, at his end. I also particularly like the Doctor not being able to see the cyber wood for the cyber trees with:
River: “I’ve traveled in time. I’m a complicated space-time event too. Throw me in.”
The Doctor: “Oh be serious, compared to me these Angels are more complicated than you and it’d take every single one of them to amount to me, so get a grip.”She’s basically informing him that they are so alike, a full 12 months before we get the truth, and he dismisses it.
No – objections to a couple of things that didn’t work for some people aside, this is one of the great linear two parters of AG who I feel. It’s a cracking adventure which I think poses some pretty neat questions, ignites the speculation frenzy (the coat!?) and made us suspect at the time that this was going in a direction that was really different from seasons 1-4.
I’ll come back to the question of the Angels later.
3 August 2013 at 17:43 #14993I agree with you on McGann perhaps having the potential for a physical appearance in the 50th. One thing that struck me was that there is no audio adventure for Eight to follow Dark Eyes (which was commercially released last year). Instead McGann is “going back in time” with occasional releases with an earlier assistant Charley (India Fisher).
Highly speculative, but it does occur to me that Big Finish may have been informed of potential chronology changes and decided to see how things play out. Nick Briggs (voice of almost everything in TV) is a Big Cheese at Big Finish, so getting voice work done undercover would be really easy.
For me, it would be fantastic. In Name of the Doctor, you have the visual representation of the iconic Doctors “look”, and in the 50th hear them. I think it would really work.
I can imagine Big Finish going “oooooohhhh” at the prospect of Doctor Hurt though. They’ve probably already explored the possibility of a range of stuff – “Memoirs of the lost Doctor” to compliment their range, like the Michael Jayston Valeyard stuff (He jests at scars being particularly good).
3 August 2013 at 17:35 #14991Just in case you think I’m a bit mad, SherriffFatman is a Guardian commentator and Dan misattributed a theory of his to me. We later started to have ideas pretty much at the same time. It was all fun exchanges. Here he is on a retrospective blog “holding a grudge” with a sense of humour. He got a recommend from me. When we had a similar idea on the news blog yesterday I thought “is history repeating”.
http://discussion.theguardian.com/comment-permalink/25057234
3 August 2013 at 13:12 #14976I was actually considering doing an attempt at a Guardian “Live Blog” on the Next Doctor forum by using one post and updating it a lot. It may depend on how much I drink.
3 August 2013 at 13:03 #14975I think I heard them say it was all @phaseshift ‘s fault
I may need TARDIS translation circuits to understand what you’re getting at here. 😉
I’d completely forgotten we were doing this as a two parter. I think it may be tomorrow before I get round to watching both parts.
3 August 2013 at 12:43 #14974@scaryb @bluesqueakpip @shazzbot
To put that interview into some perspective, I think it’s wise to remember some of the reporting that arose around it. A couple of days beforehand McCoy, Baker and McGann were in Australia being interviewed, and Sylvesters comments were reported thusly:
I’d suggest it was really out of character for McCoy, all that “the fans demand it” stuff, and the usual action surrounded it.
Baker was very clear that “we’re out of the country how can we be in it when they’re filming it.”
They didn’t repeat those comments two days later in the New Zealand interview you hear in the background, and I think it was left to McGann to offer an olive branch, by saying “Hey – we don’t know”.
I think the initial comments were a ruse to clearly demonstrate they weren’t in it that caused (what should have been predictable) “outrage”. This may be just wishful thinking, but I suspect they are in it, in one form or another, and the route is through what Paul doesn’t talk about here, which is the audio work for Big Finish. They are all getting together to record a 50th anniversary special of their own (Baker I, Davison, Baker II, McCoy and McGann). It would be massively easy to record some new high quality dialogue for the TV special and insert it post production into the TV version. Illustrated by “Pictures” perhaps.
2 August 2013 at 21:41 #14903Thank god for TARDIS translation circuits. For a moment I thought you may have a couple of wits about your person. Sadly – you’re unarmed.
2 August 2013 at 18:11 #14875It was something I was mulling on, and I think would really be worth exploring in an intial blogpost. I think it may be good with a launch blog and a general forum, like the Music, Film, etc that we have. One idea I had for a communal play was one of the free adventure games (Blood of the Cybermen or Shadows of the Vastra Nerada) over a weekend before the 50th (and we have a couple of weeks opportunity based on projections of old showings).
Take-up may not be magnificent, but to touch on that world, and launch a general thread may be beneficiial in the long run?
2 August 2013 at 17:26 #14873On the one hand, I think that “shipping” — trying to figure out who will get with whom, and who we’d prefer to end up together — is something endemic to television. I think that watchers have been having these imaginings since watching began.
I’ve stayed out of this one for now, but had to chip in and agree with you here. I was unaware of the “shipping” thing until @pedant, @bluesqueakpip and @juniperfish explained it. Once you understand it, you recognise it.
My mum was addicted to soaps like Coronation Street, Eastenders and so forth and often used to comment that “such and such” didn’t deserve “another character” they should be with “this character”. Perhaps she could be defined as a “shipper”. Her reality was better than the imagination of the writer?
With Rose, I do think it was unfortunate. You have 2 series with her, and the following one (with Martha) her absence informed it. When you come to series 4 (and many have missed this) you have the great partnership of Donna and the Doctor, but in the first episode you are informed that she is to return (in the crowd, at the end).
All four series informed by one bloody character. I can understand people who express frustration at this point. I did myself, even if I think series 4 played out as best it could by minimising that expectation.
Does Ten love Rose? Well, yes. From the script:
DONNA: “It’s better than that, though.Don’t you see what he’s giving you? Tell her, go on.”
THE DOCTOR #2: “I look like him. Think like him. Same memories, same thoughts, same everything, except… I’ve only got one heart.”
ROSE: “Which means..?”
THE DOCTOR #2: “I’m part Human. Specifically, the ageing part. I’ll grow old. And never regenerate. I’ve only got one life, Rose Tyler. I… could spend it with you. If you want.”
ROSE: “You’ll grow old… at the same time as me?”
THE DOCTOR #2: “Together.”Music swells, etc. Confrontation with Doctor 1. Doctor 2, who is exactly the same, says the words and they share a passionate kiss. The script has told us they are the same, except that pesky timelord biology.
If you want to ignore the patently obvious in this one, I commend you on the thickness of your plot beer goggles.
Just to add insult to injury – 10s last moments. After having a laugh at the prospect of pairing up the cast-offs of Mickey and Martha, who is the last face Ten wants to see?
Shippers Paradise.
2 August 2013 at 16:43 #14869The reason I did the intro to the last clip tangents into @pedant s excellent blogpost on trolling. Man – he can drive some fans nuts.
He is polite and enthusiastic with fans at conventions, but he’s honest in that it has become something he does. He doesn’t always get “fandom” and he really is a target for trolls. He can be genuinely hilarious with some of the hyperbole that surrounds discussion of the series and still remains stunned that he is currently appearing on stamps and coins.
I’m really glad he annoys those people. I don’t expect Tom to be his own fan. I don’t begrudge him not choosing to watch himself, in his prime, at the “Robots of Death” screening. Some do. I don’t expect the best actor to be a fan of the show, but I want the best actor in the role. If you demand a fan in the role, as some do, you look a bit laughable.
Here he is being interviewed in NZ this year. Yes, that is Sylvester in the background.
2 August 2013 at 16:39 #14868Many thanks for that link to http://www.vpforums.org/, I think I may spend a happy couple of hours over the weekend exploring that. You actually reminded me that we haven’t explored a general “Gaming” forum yet, which was something I considered back when we launched the Music thread. Something to ponder on we consider the show getting more “interactive”.
With out uncanny sense of timing, can I ask if you have ever served in the role of Sheriff in any capacity? And possibly been mistaken for one another (or at least our theories) by a Guardian Blog writer?
2 August 2013 at 14:48 #14855@htpbdet @Shazzbot @fatmaninabox
John Barrowman
I may have to consult with my fellow creative (this must be a partnership forged in TV Hell) @fatmaninabox, but my inner commissioning editor is still screaming “Graham Norton” in this case. Because he’s on payroll and Barrowman in contracted in stuff like “Green Arrow”.
I’d see Barrowman, and perhaps people like Alex Kingston, as the big guests for a week who play roles opposite the hopefuls to see if they can recreate the magic. Can you imagine:
Graham: “Last week, little Dean Gaffney impressed the phone audience with his .. unique .. rendition of the ‘Marriage on top of the Ziggurat Scene’ opposite the divine Alex Kingston. How will he cope this week against John Barrowman, armed only with a Banana, and comparing Sonic devices in scenes from ‘The Doctor Dances’?”.
[Cut to film]
John: “All this week I’ve been rehearsing this with Dean, and I’ve got pretty frustrated because Dean doesn’t seem able to summon the underlying hardness of Ecclestone [booming laugh cut into mix]. He needs to grip his sonic, or his banana, more tightly [cuts to Graham raising eyebrow at camera]..I hope he can pull it off on the night..”.. etc.
2 August 2013 at 13:44 #14833Ahh.. @fatmaninabox beat me to it. I was about to post:
They’d have been as well doing it like the voice — having half a dozen of the main contenders audition live on TV in front of a panel of David Tennant, Tom Baker and Sylvester McCoy and finish it off with a phone vote.
That was my thought – the way of light entertainment is a dangerous one. I was imagining one of those shows where Andrew Lloyd Webber was paid from the Licence fee to audition an actor/actress for one of his bloody musical runs and publicise it.
Following that format you have a group of hopefuls who are whittled down over tedious weeks by phone voting informed by a panel of experts, with the current Exec Producer, stroking his white cat, saving his preferred one. Presented by Graham Norton.
The panel would be:
The Nice one – Russel T, who would proclaim that everyone was “marvellous” and do the booming laugh.
The Female one – Michelle Collins, who is an actress. And cheap. And appeared in “42” so that makes her an expert.
The Nasty one – THE Colin Baker, who would start every appraisal with “when I was on the show” before tearing them a new arsehole. Because Colin Baker criticising performances never ceases to be funny.The name for the show? “Trials for a Timelord”.
2 August 2013 at 01:09 #14794Well let’s look at the positive.
That format sounds bloody awful and has the potential to be cringemakingly embarrassing. This can only be alleviated by pre-emptively drinking copious amounts of alcohol, which is a positive.
The other positive of course is that it’ll put a stop to some of the barmy casting speculation stories after next week.
Huzzah!
1 August 2013 at 20:06 #14773I love The Wicker Dalek (OK – I know it’s straw). Who are we going to burn?
On your second link I take it that what all the Spoiler action is about?
1 August 2013 at 16:43 #14752Just to introduce this clip – Doctor Who at 40 – Doctor Eight.
Just before this was filmed the BBC had announced the Doctor would be returning. Paul McGann turns up to talk about the film and his audio work. He is bombarded with questions about his role in a show returning that he knows nothing about. I think he makes a good stab at a response. It features McCoy, talking heads like Barry Letts, Lalla Ward and others talking (and this is a clear warning to @bluesqueakpip) about who the next Doctor should be (in 2003). 🙂
1 August 2013 at 16:37 #14750As a Babylon 5 fan of some note in these parts, I think you’d like the Eighth in novels and audio work beyond the Movie.
J. Michael Straczynski really drew on his love of Brit sci-fi for that series. Blake’s 7 for the adversarial dialogue, the liberator look of the Drahzi sundog. He equated the idea of the TechnoMage to The Doctor, and if you watch their manipulative appearance in series 2, or Galen in Excalibur, you can see the impish humour and being one step ahead of things from the McCoy period. It really is funny how these ideas go round and round. Eight is a bit of a TechnoMage in that regard.
1 August 2013 at 16:09 #14748and it really doesn’t fit with the ‘man and his time machine’ format that is Doctor Who.
Well congratulations on making it through. Just consider in the preceding months I’ve sat through Twin Dilemma and Time and the Rani and I consider this the easiest of the three to revisit! When three regeneration tales make you misty eyed for Castrovalva you have to conclude that new regeneration tales are a bit trickier than most, and why I consider Eleventh Hour the best.
Yes, it’s pretty obvious (even if it wasn’t established fact) that Jon Pertwee was Segals Doctor. It does show through that he saw it more as “the action adventure” series, with scenes like the motorbike chase, and callouts like the lifting of clothes in the hospital (with 11 that almost makes the Doctor a hospital locker kleptomaniac).
I think it probably did inform the next generation on some elements that worked and some that didn’t, and how the show would return in 2005. There was some fairly detailed profiling of reaction to this “pilot” that was never released because it was outside the BBChome remit at the time (and hence was done by its commercial arm). It couldn’t return as a cheapo B-grade episodic drama was pretty much established in the feedback from this experiment. The bits and pieces that crept onto the early internet through leaks clearly said, in terms of duration, “A bit more like X-Files”. To which you could apply say Star Trek, Buffy, Farscape, or even going back in time The Avengers or The Prisoner in the UK. A duration that they tried in the Davison era, but made the mistake of switching day/timeslot at the same time, which would have confused matters.
The film really does feel so of its time though. Millennial angst – how very mid 90s.
31 July 2013 at 22:06 #14700It’s similar in style to Nines coat, but is a bit longer to reflect some elements of Eights old coat in leather form. As @chickenelly said, this range of dramas were intended to dovetail into the new series. The change of look had to go through BBC approvals.
@chickenelly – I always meant to ask – did you manage to get over your difficulties with the last series of audio adventures?
31 July 2013 at 17:02 #14669“I AM THE DOCTOR!”
The Eighth Doctor. Possibly inspiring Murray Gold a decade and a bit later.
Paul McGann, like Sylvester before him, seemed to be the Doctor for a long time, as the comics started a successful run as the BBC continued it’s cold war on fans/put a series which was in danger of eating itself out of its misery* (Delete according to taste) by refusing to renew the licence for Virgin to publish Doctor Who novels. BBC in-house publishing continued the adventures of the Eighth, with additional new stories for old Doctors. I find them a mxed bag again, but some familiar names from the old Virgin range started to crop up. Rereading a few to review Eights period it struck me that they haven’t aged as badly as the Virgin novels.
What’s interesting is that for one appearance, both comics and books do capture a lot of what his only appearance on screen was all about, and then develop it in individual ways. I think he certainly made an impression. In concepts, the writers seemed to seize on that kiss and play with the notion. Companions who actually lust after the Doctor, while he remains cheerfully unaware of the effect he’s having – that really started here. Other concepts, like the Doctor creating semi-sentient computer code to do his bidding, and foreshadowings of a great “Time War” that would consume Gallifrey actually started in the late nineties/early naughties in book form.
Before the decision was made to bring the show back, Big Finish approached McGann about adding to their old Doctors audio range. He threw himself into them with apparent gusto. Collecting them can be an expensive hobby, but his main audio series have been broadcast on Radio 7, BBC4xtra. Just after Christmas, it’s a rare treat. More Doctor Who is always welcome.
In these, I think he gives a good account of what his Doctor could be. It’s like the movie, in that he’s whimsical, passionate, and occasionally very funny. It’s also complimented by him being maddening, not afraid to lie to his companions, and all manner of new quirks. Audio plays are not to everyone’s taste, but his are some of the best things Big Finish have produced in my opinion. A hybrid of the BG era informed with more of an AG philosophy in structure and scope. Not every story is a winner, but that’s always been the case.
He’s been aided by a fantastic companion in the last few series by Sheridan Smith as “Lucie Miller”. A remarkable story with a tragic end.
So – after the 50th and after we’ve seen Eleven regenerate in the Christmas special, it’s hopeful that the radio will be blessed with the return of the Eighth Doctor in the short “Dark Eyes” series. Lucie is gone, and the Doctor has boasted to the Daleks about his early opportunity to destroy them and the Time Lords intention to wipe them out at birth, confessing “I wish I’d done it” and it all seems to be going to a bad place. Bring on the makeover!
31 July 2013 at 16:59 #14668“Who am I? WHO…AM…I?!”
The Eighth Doctor goes through an identity crisis in the Movie. Ironic.
Paul McGann. The Eighth Doctor. The one from “The Movie”. The mistake that shows “those Damn Americans can’t be trusted with Doctor Who”.
To be honest – that’s often the reaction any discussion on McGann gets. Such is the reputation of his single screen outing, and some pretty crude assumptions, it can be difficult to separate the reality from fiction. To separate the Face and his performance from a multitude of other issues that surround it.
I remember being cautiously excited by the prospect of the Doctors return. I may not have been if the full story of its 5 year tale of Development Hell had been known (skip down to the production notes in this well researched TARDIS wiki entry). What we did know was that the main creatives were Philip Segal (Brit abroad Doctor Who fan), Brit Writer Matthew Jacobs (who had visited the set of The Gunfighters as a boy, as his father was appearing in it), Brit Director Geoffrey Sax, and with an Executive Producer from BBC Enterprises to oversee things on behalf of the rights holders interests.
Clan McGann were pretty well known as versatile actors. Paul in particular had a wide range of well known work, that were very different in style so he didn’t seem pigeon holed. I was delighted by the announcement.

Byronesque object of desire? Or “looking like a great big ponce” (Lucie Miller)After watching it, I read the reviews, the fanzines, and the early internet talkboards. Personally I’d winced at all the “Daleks killed the Master on Skaro and handed his remains to the Doctor” stuff. Had my Jaw dropped (in stunned disbelief) at the half human reveal and had begun to seriously upgrade Ainley as the Master after seeing Eric Roberts (Roberts has described his own performance as “cartoon terrible”). None of those were the main talking point though. Can you guess what was?
The Doctor had kissed a Lady, which was officially A BAD THING. My god, the drivel written about that was incredible. It looks so innocent these days. In addition, the early internet action was as insanely creative in trying to pick faults as it is today. My favourite being “Since when has the Doctor rode around on a motorbike?”.
Let’s look at the positive though. The Seventh Doctor gets a regeneration! Sylvester thinks that may have been a mistake (for an initial story) these days, but I don’t think any story in this format was ever in danger of progressing to a series. So hurrah to him for doing it, and he was splendid. I loved the TARDIS redesign as old sexy sets the desktop to Gothic Steampunk. Some of the direction is great. I thought McGann himself was the best thing about it though. Regeneration stories can be tricky, but he races through post regenerative memory loss and gradual recovery with a balance of whimsy and growing confidence (although there were a couple of OTT moments where he was asked by Sax to “amp it up”). It also contains a fair few callouts to the old series in the same way Series 7 has (the Bike scene written as a tribute to Pertwee, whose memory the film is dedicated to, as he died shortly before it was completed).
With an audience of over nine-million in the UK and AI rating of 77 (easily better than the last years of the BG era), if it had gone to a series, I’m pretty sure the BBC would have supported it. While I would have welcomed Doctor Eight, I didn’t think much of Segals vision of what he wanted for the show. A peculiar mixture of high budget restagings of old stories (Tomb of the Cybermen and The Gunfighters were two identified) and odd new concepts such as parallel universe “Spider Daleks”.
Maybe it would have been great? The things that annoy fans don’t seem to trouble the bigger “lump” of people referred to as casual viewers. Take out the couple of fan-baity things, and what do you have? A Regeneration tale, which although drawing on too many established tropes of 90s US TV, is slightly more adept than stories like Time and the Rani and The Twin Dilemma. I certainly find it easier to revisit than those monstrosities.
Poor Eight. Few will champion him as their favourite Doctor. Time was too short. No schoolkids really grew up with him as “their” screen Doctor. Rather than evidence of automatic US failure though, I’d see the tale more of a cautionary one of transferring a property to Co-production status and, in new territory, assuming a change in tone and direction is necessary based on some pretty vague evidence. Such as assuming the “Spock effect” (that an audience wouldn’t identify with an alien character, so let’s make him half human) still held true in the 90s as when it was “established” in the 60s.
It’s a tale that may resonate with RTD now. So adept in the revival of Doctor Who in 2005, just consider the results of (cough) Miracle Day (spit). Similar issues, similar results.
I’d love to see McGann get some more screen time as the Doctor. I stated in our audio adventures thread early in the year that an appearance in the 50th would be a treat for me. For all the faults of the film, his feels like a performance that would easily fit in with the AG Doctors. His tangent off-topic at the end of this clip, and his absolute glee about his new shoes just feels very Doctorish.
31 July 2013 at 16:54 #14667For the Eighth month, we consider the Eighth Doctor played briefly on screen by Paul McGann. Your thoughts on him, and any of his predecessors are welcome.

Alas – the BBC AI report on the movie is not available. Viewing figures were 9.3 million with an AI of 77.
Those watching “Talons” in our recent retrospective will have the DVD of the movie in the Regenerations Box set. Those wishing to access it elsewhere may be interested in the Netflix free months trial for which you’d have access to the movie and others. Or try here in short chunks.
28 July 2013 at 15:04 #14550In the Ghost Light Ep 1 thread we mentioned the music of the time, and that reminded me of something. I see the Tim Minchin version of the Who theme from the Comedy Prom has made it here, but I though I would post this from the one off BBC Scotland series “Is it Bill Bailey?”
His take on Doctor Who music.
28 July 2013 at 14:58 #14549Yes it was Ayres for this one. I think a lot of it was the budget at the time which didn’t allow for them to “dwell” for any length of time.
Listening to the Prom, I was pleased that so many of the old composers (like Simpson and Ayres) were there to see their work profiled. You can’t help but wonder if they were thinking “I’m in the Royal Albert Hall listening to a full Orchestra belt out something I worked on 30-40 years ago as a jobbing Composer. Someone wake me up now!”.
28 July 2013 at 14:55 #14548It’s not really news, so I’ll post this here. It’s more of an “after-event” thing for the SDCC appearance, as Matt Smith turns up on the Craig Ferguson show (who deserves some kind of award for shameless promotion of Doctor Who on a rival American Network). Quite fun.
28 July 2013 at 14:54 #14547 -
AuthorPosts


