Dr Who News (5)
17 May 2022 at 20:53 #73141
Please note that The Radio Times is growing increasingly spoilerish with their publication of episode plot details in advance of anything the BBC has officially released, so please think twice before you post in ‘News’ rather than ‘Spoilers’ something from the Radio Times.
Please see our Etiquette page for further information about how this site views spoilers.
(This is a continuation of the Doctor Who News (4) thread which was nearing its posting limit.)17 May 2022 at 23:12 #73145
@jimthefish Thanks for the new page. It is true that the old one was getting rather full, and at the rate that news stories about the next RTD incarnation are emerging, this page will fill up quickly, I suspect. Indeed, I have been reading so much about it in the last couple of days (but not from the BBC, so not for this page) I am actually feeling a bit sorry for Chibnall and Jodie, whose final story seems to be completely overshadowed by all the announcements about RTD’s return.18 May 2022 at 17:53 #73146
I suspect you’re right — although it’s hardly RTD’s fault and is largely down to the public filming. But I think it’s almost certainly true that a lot of people will be watching Jodie’s last episode just waiting for Tennant to show up.
Having said that, even at this early stage, RTD has already provided some juicy material for bonkerising, so I think a visit to Spoilers might be in order….19 May 2022 at 10:24 #73147
Ummm. Yasmin Finney as Rose. I’m rather conflicted about that, for two reasons. One, obviously, is that Yasmin Finney looks nothing like Billie Piper, and since Rose is not a Timelord, how could that happen? Okay, she did look into the Tardis core, and I guess RTD will find a way to make her change of appearance work (regeneration?). But it better be good.
The other is that Billie Piper as Rose (or the Interface) was one of those fortunate actors who the camera loves, as they say. Just leaning against a wall in the background, she drew your attention like a magnet. I’d be reluctant to see her legacy impaired by a less than stellar performance. I haven’t seen Yasmin Finney in anything, I hope her acting is as good as her looks. But she better be good.
I suppose one hopeful factor is that RTD wrote Rose before, so he should have the ability to write Rose 2 well – and should be motivated not to sabotage all his earlier work. So Yasmin should have, err, rather better material to work with than Jodie did. I live in hope 🙂19 May 2022 at 20:53 #73148Bluesqueakpip @bluesqueakpip
RTD has done this before – rumours abounded that the Rani was coming back, but it turned out to be a another character called Rani. Unless Rose acquired the ability to regenerate when she became Bad Wolf, I’d guess this is the same thing. Yasmin Finney is playing someone called Rose. Not the Billie Piper character.
Given that Rose Tyler is presumed dead, I suppose there might be some kind of ‘named after’ connection.19 May 2022 at 21:57 #73149
What @bluesqueakpip said. I believe the prevalent theory at the moment is that this new Rose is new character and not some new version of the original Rose (there is a more specific theory but I think I’ll save that for the Spoilers section). As to Yasmin Finney’s credentials, they look pretty solid. I’ve only checked out a couple of episodes of Heartstopper and she strikes me as pretty good in it. And let’s not forget just what the general reaction to Piper’s casting was back in the day and just how comprehensively she proved the naysayers wrong.20 May 2022 at 02:04 #73152
@jimthefish Yes I recall how how well Billie Piper did, against initial prognostications, that’s why I’d hate to see her performance retrospectively clouded by a less-than-stellar ‘Rose 2’ (if Rose 2 is supposed to be the ‘same’ character, which I note she may not be). (Understand, I have absolutely no knowledge of Yasmin Finney, I hope she does really well).
I will hie me off to ‘Spoilers’ at this point.20 May 2022 at 03:19 #73153
So much cool news, but so long to wait.21 May 2022 at 13:47 #73156toinfinityandbepond @toinfinityandbepond
rumours of Martha returning now…21 May 2022 at 16:51 #73164
@toinfinityandbepond Oh I hope those rumours prove true. Would be nice for Martha to be a part of the 60th Anniversary episode.
Janette26 May 2022 at 22:38 #73184Jimbeaux Slice @jimbeauxslice
Found this article today about the upcoming new season.
What are your thoughts on the upcoming season?27 May 2022 at 03:39 #73186
@jimbeauxslice Hello! Welcome to the site, I hope you like it here. I am excited about the next series but have no specific theories yet. I only know that it is so far away and I hate waiting.
It will be interesting to see what direction RTD takes the show in and a new Doctor is always exciting. The 60th anniversary show seems to have everyone in it and I love to see the old faces so I guess it is just the waiting.
Stay safe27 May 2022 at 14:13 #73189Jimbeaux Slice @jimbeauxslice
@winston Thanks for the warm welcome. The creators of the original show were brilliant when they came up with idea that the Doctor could regenerate into anyone. It gives them infinite possibilities when casting.12 June 2022 at 04:02 #73236syzygy @thane16
I didn’t did I? Read “I hope her acting is as good as her looks?” Nah, I wouldn’t have read that.
I think the Nu Rose, is in fact a different character called Rose. But I’m effectively 10 weeks behind. Thrilled RTD is taking over the rains. Chibnall must be knackered. I mean surely “he looks a little tired….” 🙂
old Puro. Hope all and everyone is well.12 June 2022 at 20:22 #73237
@thane16 Good to see you back, Puro! I hope you are doing well. I agree with your sentiments, and am looking forward to a return to the RTD era … with hope!13 June 2022 at 13:03 #73238
Well, I’m intrigued by ‘Nu Rose’. She must be a different character (this can’t possibly be one of those occasions when they re-cast the same character with a different ‘look alike’ actor, which is rarely ever convincing anyway and – given Billie’s and Yasmin’s looks – they’re obviously not going to do). Which raises the intriguing question, how and why is RTD doing it? It must mean something. It could be total coincidence, of course – no law of physics precludes that – but it would be a massive let-down unless it has some significance to the story. Even if no more than ‘the Doctor manages to retrieve a ‘Rose’ from the other dimension and gets the wrong one’.
I hope RTD comes up with something satisfying.26 July 2022 at 18:10 #73319
I’m not sure if anyone has mentioned it here on the forums yet, but there has been talks about Doctor Who potentially moving to Disney +.
Currently here in the US, Doctor Who is streaming on HBO Max. Personally I think that seems like the better fit, and I kind of hope it doesn’t go to Disney. But that’s just my thoughts on it. I also don’t really want a “Whoniverse” of the same magnitude as the tangled Marvel movies anyway. I think one show is honestly enough.27 July 2022 at 07:45 #73321
There have been spinoffs. Torchwood, which started okay, but then got very dark and a bit too grim for my tastes (personally, I like ‘dark’, but not that dark). And the Sarah Jane Adventures, which was aimed at a younger audience (and I never watched). Just personally, I think one show – Who – is enough.
I rather dread the influence of any American megacorp intent on ‘maximising the returns from their intellectual property’ or however they choose to describe corporate greed.28 July 2022 at 15:57 #73328
I am sad to pass on the news that Bernard Cribbins has died today at the age of 92. I’m sure all of us would like to pass on our collective condolences to his family, Bernard was a great comedic character actor who has given us all memorable characters over 70 years from his Carry-on roles to his role as Wilfred Mott -not his first role on Who20 August 2022 at 00:43 #73371
Christmas is coming, and here is something to save up all those pennies for.15 September 2022 at 04:03 #7340216 September 2022 at 13:58 #73403
Thank you for the news @blenkinsopthebrave. I wish I was more excited but maybe, the end will be better than previous. I keep hoping and if Ian is in it then there will be at least one reason to watch it.
Janette17 September 2022 at 03:39 #73404
@blenkinsopthebrave Well , it looks like they have all the major baddies in this one. It should be exciting with all those guys in it and the Master is always fun to watch. I am looking forward to this one and I hope they send the 13th Doctor off with a bang.
stay safe17 September 2022 at 09:39 #73405
@janetteb Maybe the finale will be, as you say, better. (That’s called ‘damning with faint praise I think 😉 I’m still waiting for my Resolution of the Daleks DVD to arrive so then I can watch Series 13 (which I already have but waiting to watch in sequence) so then after that there’s a couple of specials before ‘The Power of the Doctor’. Whittaker series 2 was better than Whittaker series 1 anyway, hopefully the progression continues.
Oh, *Revolution* of the Daleks, it seems, we had Resolution (of one Dalek IIRC) before. Revolution, Revelation, Retribution, Restitution, Evolution, Dissolution, Termination, Extermination (of course), Elevation, I can think of an almost infinite number of potential ‘… of the Daleks’ titles. My mind is rambing out of control, I think a lack of new Doctor Who episodes to digest… 🙂
@winston Well, I hope the confluence of ‘all the major baddies’ works. Sometimes, more is not better. For example, Journey’s End where they had a chorus line of companions working the Tardis – it all felt kind of phony and artificial, as if they had to find something for everybody to do and give everyone equal billing. In dramatic terms, it doesn’t work unless there’s some specific reason for each person to be there. I think in Pandorica Opens/Big Bang it worked because having all the Doctor’s enemies combining was kind of the point (and nor did they try to give each one an equal share of screen time). But what do I know, I won’t see it anyway for six months until the DVD comes out…19 September 2022 at 21:25 #73406Mudlark @mudlark
For the record, there is an interview with Steven Moffat in today’s Guardian in which, among other things, he discusses with good humour some of the more negative responses to his take on Doctor Who and Sherlock.
Thanks for that link. The ingredients could, in theory, add up to an exciting send-off for the thirteenth Doctor and I will certainly watch it, but I await it with muted expectations. ‘Blessed are they who expect nothing for, either way, they will not be disappointed’.20 September 2022 at 14:22 #73407
@mudlark That was an excellent interview with the Moff. Two things the critics reportedly alleged, which I absolutely disagree with – one was (alleged) misogyny. Maybe my perspective is different from this side of the gender gap, but would a misogynist ever have created such strong and appealing female characters as Sally Sparrow, River Song, Amy, Missy, Clara, Osgood, the Interface (Rose), or Bill?
And the other was ‘clever’ ‘puzzle-box’ plots. Maybe that’s more a matter of taste, but I absolutely love a multi-layered plot where words and actions take on a different significance with hindsight and where a second watching is rewarded by new insights. The obvious example being Hell Bent where we don’t know (first time through) which one is fishing for information and which one knows exactly what is going on. That adds more depth to the episode, helped of course by good acting and characterisation (always need that). Or Last Christmas, another classic. And, it’s always fun to watch. I sometimes think the critics are so cynical they can’t stand watching something that’s just plain well-made, polished and enjoyable.
[/rant]20 September 2022 at 23:07 #73408Mudlark @mudlark
Your views on Moffat’s writing coincide pretty much exactly with mine. I, too, love the ‘puzzle boxes’ and the densely layered plots which repay multiple re-viewings – so much more satisfying than simple narratives, though I concede that the latter can be very entertaining. As for the accusations of misogyny, I, born in 1942 and raised feminist almost from the cradle, failed to see any. In fact, I think he is pretty good on the whole at writing female characters and there is a small, inner bad girl part of me that would love to be River Song – after all, we do share a profession, although I might justifiably criticise her methods 😉
Last Christmas is one of my favourite episodes among the Christmas specials, too.
Chibnall suffers in contrast in coming directly after this high point. He is by no means a bad writer and no doubt there are many who prefer his approach, but it seems to me that he has failed to understand the inner essence of the Doctor or the show as a whole as it has developed, and that may be in part why Whittaker has not, as Matt Smith and Peter Capaldi did, conveyed any real sense that she is very old and contains the experience and knowledge of all her previous incarnations. In commenting I have tried not to be too critical and to focus on what was positive, but it is telling that the numbers of people commenting here as markedly decreased, and that for me, personally, whilst episodes written by Moffat or during his tenure as showrunner remain clear in my somewhat erratic memory, most of those since Chibbers took over tend to be somewhat hazy.21 September 2022 at 00:52 #73409
After reading the Moffat interview I can only agree with your reflections on both Moffat and Chibnall. But I also found myself recognizing a slight irritation on his part to being criticized for his cleverness (as if cleverness was a character flaw) that reminded me of Johnathan Miller.
Miller was seemingly, or indeed actually, brilliantly clever at just about everything, from comedy to medicine to directing opera, but was intensely irritated at being criticized for his cleverness.21 September 2022 at 07:22 #73410
@mudlark and @dentharturdent (excellent avatar btw) Agree with both posts. I do get irritated by MOffat’s use of the psychopath label when applied to River Song as she is not a psychopath though at times that aspect of her character is inconsistent but that is a different, and minor niggle. Moffat created some memorable female characters who were strong and able to hold their own against the Doctor. NO mean feat. Also his characters never overshadowed the Doctor.
I too love the puzzle box nature of Moffat’s scripts which is why I am always checking to see what he is doing next.
Mudlark I too have tried to remain positive about the more recent series but now it is almost over I am analysing why it failed to engage me in the way that previous series did. It tried to be Doctor Who but something was always missing, an ingredient that I find hard to define. A friend recently described some tv series as being “like a hug”. These are the series that we go back to time and time again, watching and rewatching, because not only do they entertain and stimulate but they have that “hug” quality. that for me is Dr Who, RTD did capture that quality but it was under Moffat’s tenure that it really shone for me. Chibnell’s tenure could entertain but it rarely stimulated any real analysis and was entirely lacking in the “hug” quality. There are only three or four episodes that really stand out in memory for me.
@blenkinsopthebrave. It says something about the age we live in where the term, “cleverness” is a criticism and not a compliment. I think that both MIller and Moffat are justified in being annoyed by that.
I hope that RTD will convince Moffat to write another episode or two. Maybe a Christmas Special. I do miss the Christmas Specials.
Janette21 September 2022 at 11:31 #73411
@mudlark It’s a little bit reassuring (to me) to see that female persons agree with me on Moffat’s characters and I’m not somehow blinkered by my male point of view. (Actually I just realised I’ve stereotyped myself horribly there – I’m not really sure what a ‘male point of view’ is, forget I said that 🙂
Whittaker was either mis-cast or mis-written (or both), I find it hard to see an ancient Doctor there. I’d say she’s too young, but Matt Smith was too and he managed to overcome that. I think he had more help from the script, though. WhitDoc’s habit of constantly talking to herself is annoying, comes across as dithering, and detracts from any weight her character has, IMO.
@blenkinsopthebrave I can absolutely sympathise with Moff’s irritation when, after crafting a nicely constructed story, and freshened it up with interesting and witty dialogue, some critic dismisses it as ‘too clever’. I’d be tempted to label such critics as too thick to appreciate it, but that’s probably not the case, I think it’s more a reflection of the current fashion of anti-intellectualism. In Moff’s place I’d feel like asking (sarcastically) whether he should put in a fart joke and a laugh track.
I think there’s definitely a place for stories that take a little attention to follow the plot. I know Moff has said there needs to be a little high point every five minutes to keep people watching, and that’s quite true. I think Moff was pretty good at doing both – exercising the minds of the aficionados while still keeping the attention of the casual viewer.
I’m also a sucker for interesting language (that’s NOT a euphemism for swearing!) whether dialogue or written narrative in a book. Nothing bores me quicker than reading a story where every character says the same banal predictable thing as a thousand characters before them. How to make dialogue fresh and interesting is a gift some writers have (I don’t!). And an ability to convey a lot of meaning in a few words. Terry Pratchett had that – I remember for example the tiny chuckle of delighted recognition I got when I read, of the missing Angua the werewolf, ‘her basket hadn’t been slept in’ – of course, where else would a werewolf sleep? Or, of the cruel aesthete Lord Hong’s luckless subordinates, ‘most of whom couldn’t compose poetry to save their lives, and some of them hadn’t’. Ouch! An entire horror scenario conjured up in one phrase, that’s impressive. It also tells you all you need to know about Lord Hong.
On the other hand, I once tried reading an Arthur Hailey blockbuster (Wheels, IIRC) and got about five pages in and said ‘this thing reads like a screenplay’ and gave up. It was just a straight report of how the guy got in his car and drove to work, there was no magic in the words. Or maybe I was in a dyspeptic mood and doing Hailey an injustice.
@janetteb Your point about ‘hug’ quality is very true (‘hug’ isn’t quite the word I’d use but I can’t think of a better off the top of my head). Series and episodes we keep going back to because they’re good and enjoyable to watch. And I’m afraid you’re right, none of Chibbers’ eps (so far, you never know, I haven’t seen the Flux series yet) are ones that I’d choose as one-offs. Maybe Fugitive of the Judoon with the alternative Doctor Ruth might come closest.
(If I had to choose just one, of all eps, it would likely be Day of the Doctor. Or maybe Hell Bent.)
It would be great if the Moff could be lured back to write an episode or three, wouldn’t it?
(Totally off the point, today Auckland turned on one of those lovely sunny days which it occasionally manages even in winter. My old BMW registered 22 degrees (72 F) air temperature in the supermarket car park, there was almost no wind, so I went for a walk along the deserted beach below the cliffs and took a very brief impromptu dip – the water was almost warm enough (by a couple of degrees) and what-the-hell accounted for the rest. Never, in previous years, have I ever swum before the end of November, and usually not until Christmas. Global warming?)
… and we’re way off topic in this thread by now 🙂30 September 2022 at 17:11 #73429
@mudlark and all, I agree with your spot-on analyses of the post-gap era showrunners. It’s telling that, while many episodes from the RTD and Moffat eras are vague in my mind, I can immediately recall and describe my favorites. For Chibnall, there is only one that really stands out to me, and that’s this year’s “Eve of the Daleks” New Year’s episode. By that time, I had so lowered my expectations that I ceased to expect Chibnall to deliver a proper Doctor Who episode. And then he surprised me by giving us one.
One of the things that has been missing, for me, is the Doctor’s deft humor. Chibnall made the Doctor slapsticky, and that just doesn’t work for me. Yes, there were slapstick elements with the previous Doctors, but they didn’t define the character. They all had substance and emotional heft. I believe Jodie Whittaker is a better actor than than what she was given for her character, as written. I just don’t think she had much to work with.
The other problem is that Chibnall hung his hat on this Big Idea of the timeless child. If you’re going to rewrite Doctor Who history, then you’d better do it very, very well. In my opinion, that didn’t happen. It all felt very forced and rushed, with no opportunity for emotional connection with any of the characters. Even the Doctor, who is the character we should care most about! Now, I don’t know if the BBC, Covid and/or a trimmed budget are to blame. But it seems to me that if those things are real factors, then it might be worth reconsidering the Big Idea.
It really is sad that “too clever” is considered an acceptable criticism these days. I guess we can chalk that up to the many “recycled idea” films and TV series that make up the bulk of popular viewing these days. It seems it’s become too risky for a network or film studio to support an original idea, so (with some notable exceptions) we get a lot of reconstituted titles, characters and storylines. I enjoyed Moffat’s stories precisely because I almost never got them on first viewing. But I was engaged enough to want to go back and rewatch, and also have wonderful discussions with everyone here about what it all meant. Bonkerizing is great fun!1 October 2022 at 09:13 #73431
@nerys I haven’t seen Eve of the Daleks – I’m just about to start watching season 13, Flux.
I do agree (based on seasons 11 and 12) that Chibnall doesn’t have the right touch for the Doctor. She talks too much and it makes her look dithery, superficial and annoying – she just doesn’t have any weight (emotional heft I think you called it?). But nor does she (as written by Chibnall) have the flashes of sardonic humour that previous Doctors had.
As for episodes that are ‘too clever’, I love an episode that is well constructed, maybe with several layers of meaning, and with entertaining and preferably original dialogue. I invariably watch a Moffat episode twice, firstly because it’s usually so enjoyable, and secondly to catch any bits I missed first time and also, often, words or events acquire additional significance with hindsight.
(Apropos of that, I just watched Sherlock season 2 ep 1, Scandal in Bohemia, but I’ll stick further comment in the TV Shows thread).8 October 2022 at 15:03 #734779 October 2022 at 00:57 #73479MissRori @missrori
I do feel at this point that there was something that increasingly slipped off the brainpan for me with Thirteen’s stories. I didn’t feel as compelled to pay close attention or not do other stuff while they were on like I did with Twelve’s. In particular, Chibnall and co. never seemed to find a defining personality or throughline for Thirteen as a character, compared to the strong arc that Twelve ended up with. @dentarthurdent calling her “dithery, superficial” is unfortunately one of the more accurate descriptions I’ve read. Though the word that really came to me over time was ineffectual. I liked her first season but it was not hard to agree with those who argued that she rarely seemed to have a real impact on her own adventures, which isn’t great for a protagonist unless they’re a character like Charlie Bucket who’s there to let us see an unusual new world through “ordinary” eyes (and, also, is surrounded by vibrant other characters). The whole Timeless Child arc never came up with a thematic or dramatic reason for being, which is awkward when it upended so much of the established Who canon, and the companions post-Series 11 were largely a wash. Especially after how tossed-off the spring special was, my hopes aren’t high for the finale…10 October 2022 at 03:50 #73484
@blenkinsopthebrave The trailer was exciting. Thanks. I have mixed feelings about 13s time coming to an end. The endings are sad as endings usually are and then regeneration shock sets in as I get used to a new Doctor.I didn’t like all her episodes but I always liked her.
I probably won’t get to see it when it comes on but I will try.
stay safe.13 October 2022 at 05:07 #73494
@blenkinsopthebrave Thank you for the link. As trailers go it is not bad but what strikes me is that Yaz captures my attention, the Master is entertaining, but Sacha Dhawan; I would expect no less only I still think he would be great as the Doctor), it is exciting to see old favourites, Ace and Kate Lethbridge-Stewart again but the Doctor is not really there. I just wish this was being scripted by RTD and not Chibnell.
In the end I don’t mind if it isn’t wonderful, I will watch because I love Dr Who and it is not terrible. It has never been that bad that it is not watchable but what I really cannot accept is when the artifact that is Dr Who is being stomped on which is what I feel was done in the later second and third series, not with the Timeless Child story which had some potential though I don’t think it was well though through and went against the grain of fifty years of lore rather than adding to it, which it could well have done with a little more dexterity in scripting and some degree of respect for previous lore. Jo Martin’s Doctor for instance would not have had a police box shaped Tardis. “Details, details” but details add up and too many inconsistencies impact the integrity of the whole.
And I’m ranting again. Apologies. Fingers crossed the finale will be good, and does, give J.W. a chance to shine. She really deserves it.
Janette13 October 2022 at 12:16 #73496
I just took a look at the trailer (idle curiosity, I won’t get to view the episode for months) and it reminded me of Season 13 Flux, of which I’m part way through. That is, a host of ingredients, not sure how they all fit together. Though that could just be due to the nature of trailers. But one of those disintegrations in the trailer did look very Flux-like (or maybe it’s just that the CGI people have this great ‘disintegration’ algorithm and they’re itching to use it any chance they get).13 October 2022 at 12:23 #73497
Oh, and the general problem I feel with the Flux series (so far) is – just too much. Too many characters, too much devastation, Chibbers has everything turned up to 11, makes it hard to follow and hard to take any threat seriously. The Doctor seems much improved (though, to be uncharitable, maybe that’s just because she has fewer occasions to make rambling and/or preachy speeches).18 October 2022 at 17:56 #73544
So apparently the Doctor will regenerate in a different way and a different place than usual during the Power of the Doctor.
I never really gave it much thought, but the Doctor has regenerated in the TARDIS with every AG Doctor. (Well, I haven’t seen the 12th Doctor regenerate into the 13th, but apparently that must be the same.) So I guess it will happen elsewhere.
I’m lightyears behind the rest of you all in my rewatch, but I hope it turns out to be a great finale for the Thirteenth Doctor.22 October 2022 at 22:44 #73564
Tomorrow is the Power of the Doctor special!
It will probably be a long time until I get to watch it, but hopefully for all of you caught-up people it turns out to be entertaining.24 October 2022 at 12:10 #73592
It’s been confirmed that the 3 60th anniversary Specials will all be in November 2023 so I’m assuming they’re doing something like Tennants 1st sendoff The end of Time Story as a 3 part special and giving us a story that runs for about 2-3 hrs in total. Wether it will say be over 1 weekend or 3 consecutive weekends will obviously yet to be announced. On another note evidently the new TennantDoc isDoc14 and Gnutidoc is going to be Doc15 according to an interview with RTD.25 October 2022 at 16:28 #73602
So DW is officially moving to Disney + outside of the UK. The older seasons are remaining on HBO Max for the time being. (But will likely move one day.)
I’m displeased with this news. I don’t really want to get Disney + just to watch DW. I think HBO seemed like the better place for it.25 October 2022 at 21:33 #73604
Oh, this is not good news. So I will not be able to watch new episodes of Doctor Who on Crave in Canada. Sadly, it looks like this starts with the Tennant specials? I really don’t want to subscribe to Disney Plus … especially since my only interest would be to watch Doctor Who. And, I may not. So it could be that the Jodie Whittaker incarnation will be my last one with Doctor Who. What makes me sad about this is that Russell T. Davies is returning as showrunner, and apparently Catherine Tate is returning alongside David Tennant. So this will have to be a serious discussion about how much we really want to see this.25 October 2022 at 22:08 #73605Bluesqueakpip @bluesqueakpip
I got Disney Plus primarily for the Marvel content, but it has a lot more. It looks like at some point they decided they needed movies and series for parents to watch when the kids have gone to bed. So they’ve got a lot of movies, plus box sets like The Walking Dead, Grey’s Anatomy, Buffy, Angel, How I Met Your Mother. It might be worth checking out what they have, @nerys.
I can see exactly why Disney would want Doctor Who. It positions perfectly with their Marvel and Star Wars stables. Family oriented, PG to 12A rating, worldwide fan base, potential for spin offs, mini series, merchandising. I’m sure RTD can see the possibilities for a Marvel style expansion into Disney funded mini-series while the main series remains in BBC control.
The BBC, meanwhile, is probably in one of its periodic ‘This series costs a bloody fortune’ cycles, and was only too glad to outsource to Bad Wolf and get a House of Mouse distribution deal.25 October 2022 at 22:22 #73606
@bluesqueakpip Thanks, but nothing you have listed interests me. I tried watching Grey’s Anatomy at the outset, thinking it would be along the lines of St. Elsewhere. When I realized it was General Hospital for prime time, I lost interest.
Sadly, I don’t think this is a channel I can substitute for one of my other cable channels, since it’s very likely considered premium content. So I would have to buy it as an extra channel. There has to be more than one show to motivate me to pay that kind of money.25 October 2022 at 22:44 #73607
In fact, I don’t even see Disney Plus in our cable lineup, only Disney Channel, Disney Junior and Disney XD. So I’m not sure it’s possible for me to access this via my already pricey cable subscription. And I certainly don’t want to subscribe to a separate service via my TV. Maybe I’ll wait for the Blu-rays. But I kind of doubt it. This is one of those situations when it may be time to say goodbye. It’s not what I wanted, but if it’s put beyond my means, then this is the inevitable result.25 October 2022 at 22:48 #73609
@nerys my initial response when I heard about the BBC’s deal with Disney+ to distribute Who world wide outside of the uk and Ireland was horror, in part because this felt like Disney trying to buy up a successful “franchise” to add to its portfolio. However on reflection and having watched several u-tube who commentators channels and the overall positivity the statement has bought about the BBC may have had some valid reasoning in moving/selling the distribution rights to Disney+; 1. It actually improves and widens viewing potential and therefore the fan base for Who, 2. As @bluesqueakpip indicated the no doubt large cash input Disney will be forking out will be offsetting the production costs but this may work out in the fans favour in that longer seasons may end up in the offing and guarantees funding for the program. It may also be the BBCs attempt to simplify all the complex distribution rights and deals under one banner worldwide.26 October 2022 at 12:11 #73613
@nerys With respect, you don’t have to walk away from Doctor Who just because Disney have captured him. There’s always DVD’s (which is how I’ve followed Who for the last decade). Admittedly that may put you a year behind everyone else. I shop around on Trademe (our local NZ ‘ebay’), Ebay.com, ebay.com.au, ebay.co.uk and even Amazon to see where I can pick up episodes cheapest (and I do make sure any DVD player I buy is multizone). Even second-hand DVD’s are usually fine, unlike VHS tapes they don’t suffer wear from playing, rarely accidental scratches and the vast majority of second-hand ones I buy are in near-perfect order.
One advantage of Who is, it’s timeless. That is, an episode doesn’t lose its freshness just because it was made several years ago.
Forgive me if you knew all this already 🙂26 October 2022 at 20:08 #73617
@devilishrobby I can understand the business side of it. But, from my own fan’s perspective, I’m … well, not a fan.
@dentarthurdent I checked our library system’s Doctor Who collection, which seems to be quite extensive. So I think I will go that route. This seems to work for you; I will just have to be patient. It will be hard to wait and try to avoid the discussions on this forum until I’ve actually seen the episodes.27 October 2022 at 11:43 #73620
@nerys It is do-able. Rewvian for example is working his way through old episodes. It may be a personal thing, depending how well you can tolerate being behind everybody else without getting too frustrated.
I find I can mostly ignore spoilers – one stray mention of a future circumstance doesn’t mean much to me because I don’t have any context for it. So ‘the Doctor kills the Master in Episode 13’ doesn’t really spoil me much because, by the time I’m viewing Episode 13, I’ve probably forgotten it and anyway, as we’ve all seen, things are not always as they appear and storylines can get retconned with abandon.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.