• Nick replied to the topic Spoilers (3)

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • Nick replied to the topic Spoilers (3)

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • Nick replied to the topic The Maldovarium

    @mudlark

    Your brothers a bright guy ! He right that physics at the largest scale (Relativity & gravity) and quantum physics (smallest scale) dont reconcile at all (In fact Einstein couldnt accept quantum physics could be right) and spent the end of his career trying to find a way to make things work. Along the way, he invented the maths that…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic Spoilers (3)

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @mudlark @pedant

    Need a real physicist to answer that (or a lot of time on the web). I suspect if your close enough to notice significant time dilation, then its probably safe enough to say your already paste.

  • Nick replied to the topic Spoilers (3)

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • One thing that tweaked my imagination as I reread the original blog, is just how much in common the initial conception of the Time Lords (say up to Deadly Assassin) have with Iain Bank’s conception of the Culture […]

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @thane15

    @mudlark is right. The key word is Relative. We all, regardless of location, see time pass at the same rate. 1 year is 365 days etc for all of us. What happens at extreme speed or in proximity to extreme mass, is that time passes at apparently different speeds relative to each other. In effect a person (observer) traveling close to the…[Read more]

  • @jimthefish

    I’ll have to reread the blog (as I’ve either forgotten it or never read it !). I don’t know what the traditionalist view of Who is, although I guess I might be classified in that group ! (but not by […]

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @thane15 @tardigrade @wolfweed @ichabod

    This is why the tardis has an R in its name 🙂

    Keeping the science simple, time passes for each observer at the same rate everywhere in the universe. 5 years is the same duration whether you are on the earth, the lowest level or deck 0f of the ship.

    If you travel at close to the speed of light, or get…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @blenkinsopthebrave

    🙂 I knew you had your tongue firmly in your cheek on that one, although the idea may well turn out to be right.

    @wolfweed

    Perhaps he has a lot of catching up to do with Missy, now they’re mates.

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @lisa @brewski

    A lot of British TV Drama is filmed in 60 minute episodes. As a viewer I rather wish Who had the same episode duration.

    I hope Chibnall will attempt to do a few things differently. I watched all three Monk stories back to back (without any pre-watching), which certainly made me appreciate the whole story line more than the…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @blenkinsopthebrave

    Have you got you’re calculator out to work out how many thousands of years it would take ! 68 days is just under 100,000 minutes forwards, for each 17 seconds backwards at level 0. I made that 240 days per minute, but calculating in base 60 isnt one of my strong points !

    🙂

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @wolfweed

    deliberate or continuity mistake ?

    I’d be a bit annoyed if having written a story based on some real science he then added in a real world impossibility. However, a good story is a good story and that’s all that matters at the end of the day.

  • Nick replied to the topic Spoilers (3)

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @brewski

    The average 4 part story would be about 90 minutes if you take out the titles and recap of last weeks cliff hanger. You could probably take off another 4 or 5 minutes running time if you didnt need 3 cliff hangers per story. Its hard to account for the impact of lower budgets, fewer smaller sets and less location filming, but I guess you…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic Spoilers (3)

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • Nick replied to the topic Spoilers (3)

    SPOILER, SPOILER, SPOILER...

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @brewski

    You’re reply to @jimthefish sums up the he situation in BG Who better than I wrote.

    One thought though re

    On the other hand, we all know the Doctor will (and needs to) take control of the situation.  It saves a lot of time and redundant exposition to short-cut him into the leadership role.

    Some of the very best Who stories, certainly…[Read more]

  • Nick replied to the topic World Enough and Time

    @thane15

    You’re right, having placed the TL’s at the centre, they could then be removed from it permanently, but that hasnt happened. The opposite in fact, they keep getting brought back. Three times now – brought back and destroyed again, brought back, saved them but shunted them a pocket universe, brought back into this universe (but hidden…[Read more]

  • Load More