Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
25 September 2024 at 13:10 #76922
Could someone out there PLEASE tell Paul Hanley to stop hating me? It’s making me feel like a piece of dirt, and quite frankly, I don’t know what other options I have aside from taking our conflict public. I swear to God I’ve exhausted every possible means of communication with this man, to no avail.
He wants me to respect his decision, but I cannot and will not abide by a decision that is both ignorant and unfair.
23 August 2024 at 13:39 #76878I wish this “Fourteenth Doctor” nonsense would just stop. Like…completely.
This is not an entirely separate and unique incarnation unto himself. It doesn’t act any differently from Doctor 10. (At least, Tennant doesn’t perform the part like it is.) Neither John Hurt or Jo Martin have been canonized as part of the “official” line-up; why David Tennant 2.0? What’s wrong with simply addressing him as the “Glitch Doctor,” just as Hurt is referred to the War Doctor, or Martin as the Fugitive Doctor?
To me, this smacks of Tennant favoritism gone into hyperdrive.
28 July 2024 at 18:58 #76813@dentarthurdent But I have this theory that a successful production requires a certain basic level of adequacy in each aspect e.g. script, acting, sets, sound, special effects etc. And any one of those that falls too far below the basic level risks distracting the viewer.
If that were true, movies like Night of the Living Dead and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre would have been left to rot into obscurity a looooooooooooong time ago. Hell, Army of Darkness is rife with all sorts of “incompetent” technical blunders, from stiff skeleton props to laughably cheap blue screen, but the film’s sense of humor and sheer chutzpah more than compensates. Rather than distracting the viewer, all the shoddy sets and props end up enhancing the overall experience of campy entertainment.
I think you’re placing a little too much emphasis on the importance of special effects. Granted, they can be a feast for the eyes if a director knows how to utilize them, but 1) they usually don’t, and 2) not every wannabe filmmaker on Earth has the clout to make his movie with an Avatar-scale budget. If you have the money to make a short film about two people arguing in a hotel room, make the best possible short film you can make about two people arguing in a hotel room.
27 July 2024 at 22:15 #76807@dentarthurdent Sarcastic but a fairly valid generalisation, I fear.
Silly me. I thought sarcasm was par for the course for the internet.
Anyway: “Pathetic special effects and rubber monsters” could be applied to most of classic Who’s run, for sure, but that’s doing bit of a disservice to the ingenious craftsmen who were able to cook up all sorts of sights and sounds on a ludicrously thin budget. For example: Pyramids of Mars might come off stodgy to some American fans today, but the lack of CGI at the time forced the writer to rein himself in, however unknowingly, in favor of a “substance-over-style” approach that still holds up. For crying out loud, all Sutekh really does is sit on his damn butt for most of the story (anonymous hand holding down his pillow notwithstanding), but the quality of Gabriel Woolf’s vocal performance MAKES the character awesome despite of that fact.
Compare Pyramids of Mars to Empire of Death. RTD is abundantly clear that Sutekh isn’t sitting on his butt anymore. Knowing full well a guy with a plastic doggy mask won’t cut it for 21st century audiences, RTD reimagines Sutekh as a gigantic, quadrupedal jackal from the bowels of Hell. More money for the budget means more genuine spectacle rather than creeping around an old British mansion for most of the running time. Everything Sutekh promised he’d deliver in Pyramids of Mars, we get to see in Empire.
And it’s legitimately terrifying. The sequence featuring the Doctor talking with a nameless woman reminded me of Tela Barr’s The Turin Horse in terms of raw, existential horror. That’s exactly what Sutekh’s intergalactic holocaust should be like: Something that frightens on an intellectual as much as a visceral level.
Sadly, it’s all downhill from there, with RTD having to hit the reset button to undo the bad guy’s work, Thanos-style. In addition, the script is crowded, noisy and messy the same way most contemporary entertainment is crowded, noisy and messy. There just isn’t enough time to go into the finer details of Sutekh’s backstory, or Ruby’s, or UNIT’s. (Hence why RTD dismissed Sutekh’s Egyptian background with a head-scratching “cultural appropriation” joke.)
It seems as if there’s a give and take to everything. A lower budget means more effort put into the screenplay. More money means more effort put into the visuals for a prettier experience, and yet one that still rings hollow. I guess it’s impossible to have the best of both worlds.
27 July 2024 at 20:42 #76805You want to appeal to American audiences? Just blow more stuff up. Idiocracy and the Transformers movies proved that entertaining Americans really isn’t so hard. Just insert more gross-out gags and give the TARDIS its own Matrix-style minigun that the Doctor can use to decimate Dalek hordes. (Also make sure there’s an explosion every five minutes, otherwise the audience’s attention spans will start to tune out.)
31 March 2024 at 02:37 #75478Here’s what I think the problem is: Managing DW has become too much of a “closed-off” business, with the job only available to a very small elite of men and women. Everybody just <i>knows</i> everyone too much. If not BFFs, Davies, Moffat, and Chibnall are clearly good chums with each other, and while they elbow themselves in the ribs and giggle about their own cleverness, the fans – those poor, wretched, maligned creatures – continually bang their heads against a brick wall waiting for at least one halfway decent story.
An episode that isn’t coated with 21st century snark, instead packed with the kind of honest thrills ‘n’ chills produced when the classic show was at its peak.
26 December 2023 at 05:29 #75134As a Catholic, I’ve harbored a private, admittedly irrational fear that 21st century WHO might have it in for my type. (I know RTD is homosexual, in addition to a Richard Dawkins fanboy, and…well, I would understand why he’d have an axe to grind.)
Imagine my delight upon seeing that wasn’t the case at all. Hell, the Doctor LITERALLY used the church’s spire to spear the head baddie like a vampire!
17 December 2023 at 00:21 #75044@ps1l0v3y0u I’m more than aware of the kind of B.S. a showrunner has to endure, but that still doesn’t excuse some of the downright mind-boggling creative decisions by Chibnall. Not once did I ever get a vibe of authentic depth or darkness from Jodie’s Doctor; she never stopped being the irritating klutzy bubblehead vs. the brooding, stygian creature that Tom Baker and David Tennant could channel so beautifully at the drop of a hat. For someone who was a fan of the show since childhood, Chibnall managed to conceive the most bafflingly one-note take on the character ever.
Good Lord, can you imagine how awesome it would have been if Whittaker’s goofy, doofy persona suddenly receded to reveal the terrifying ancient entity we briefly saw in stories like “Pyramids of Mars” or “The Family of Blood?” The fact we already know that Whittaker had the acting chops to go dark if the script called for it makes the wasted potential of her incarnation all the more infuriating.
12 December 2023 at 13:27 #74982@whohar Correct, AoD is indeed the third movie in the Evil Dead series. Evil Dead II probably didn’t leave as much of an impact on you because it was meant to be horror/comedy rather than straight-up horror like the first one.
Speaking of which:
11 December 2023 at 10:39 #74964@whohar Army of Darkness. Give it a watch, and you’ll see what I mean. What you saw in The Giggle was basically the kid-friendly version with less body horror.
Fun Fact: The scene from Army of Darkness was inspired in turn by a 1959 b-movie called The Manster, where the protagonist also undergoes a radical “split.”
11 December 2023 at 06:01 #74951@whohar I’d have less of a problem with the “bi-generation” concept if it wasn’t so creepy. And gross. (Not just because it strongly reminded me of a similar moment from my favorite Sam Raimi movie, either.)
I mean, what’s stopping RTD from revisiting this idea over and over again? Is this going to be a recurring thing now, with the Doctor “splitting” like an amoeba every time he’s mortally injured? If I was in Kate Stewart’s shoes, I’d start looking at the Doctor as less of a friend, and more of an ungodly abomination. But that could just be my inner Conservative talking.11 December 2023 at 04:21 #74949Can we all agree that RTD’s “just let it go” message from STAR BEAST looks a little bit hypocritical in light of this episode? I mean, Good Lord…his flat-out refusal to EVER let go of David Tennant has become downright comical. The next time someone chides me for never being able to get over the Tom Baker years, I’ll fling this story right back in their face.
10 December 2023 at 11:56 #74922@unitpicker Given how RTD has flat-out stated that he’s going out of his way to rile up the fans this time, I wouldn’t be surprised if they were one and the same. Perhaps he’s going to have Susan regenerate into a Lovecraftian cthulhoid horror?
10 December 2023 at 05:57 #74919For those of us who AREN’T fawning Tenheads, can we please be allowed to refer to Tennant as “the Doctor who will never f*** off and die?” Seriously, I hope Sutekh comes along and nukes “BiGen” Doctor alongside his family of happy, daffy glass-klinking gits.
…okay, that was mean. I’m sorry.
10 December 2023 at 05:55 #74918For those of us who AREN’T fawning Tenheads, can we please be allowed to refer to Tennant as “the Doctor who will never f*** off and die?” Seriously, I hope Sutekh comes along and nukes “BiGen” Doctor alongside his family of happy, daffy glass-klinking gits.
…okay, that was mean. I’m sorry.
6 December 2023 at 10:40 #74830It’s kind of a shame Michael Gough wasn’t around to reprise the Toymaker, although by now he would’ve been…what, 105 years old? Phew.
5 December 2023 at 14:20 #74809@juniperfish See, my concern with a show like Bridgerton is the fact that it basically exists in a utopian alternate history where racism was never a problem. I would give almost anything to live in such a world, but sadly, we don’t. On the other hand, what exactly is preventing our children and our children’s children from getting the idea in their heads that this is the ONLY “version” of history worth keeping in the books? If we try to “paint over” all the ugly blemishes in human civilization to make it look pretty, what’s going to prevent those same blemishes from re-emerging?
@miapatrick Okay, Captain Oxford, if MLK is a bad example, how about Ben Affleck playing Bill Cosby? Does that get your personal seal of approval of “Good Example?” Or are you going to push your spectacles up your noise and lecture me about why Cosby was campaigning for women’s rights? How about Idi Amin? Is he a better example?
Please stop talking to me.
3 December 2023 at 13:33 #74757At the risk of sounding like yet another hyper-conservative creep…I’ll admit to feeling a tad uneasy about Nathaniel Curtis’s casting as Isaac Newton. (He’s Indian on his father’s side.) Fictional characters in historical stories are one thing, but when you screw around with a real-life figure in history who was…well…an actual white guy, whether we like it or not…
Look, folks, let’s be brutally honest: If they ever cast Hugh Grant as Martin Luther King Jr., do you REALLY think no one would be just a little bit peeved? I wonder how Russell T. Davies would respond if I asked him that same question.
3 December 2023 at 11:27 #74754I almost feel like falling down to my knees in the front of all the Tenheads among the viewing audience, clawing at their feet and sobbing like a pathetic wretch:
“There! You’ve been given THREE WHOLE EPISODES of Tennant! One of them was LITERALLY just Tennant and Tate! Tom Baker was NEVER that lucky! Will you PLEASE move on now?! Will you PLEASE continue watching the show even after Tennant’s left for the UMPTEENTH FRIGGIN’ TIME?! For the love of GOD!!”
Then I curl up into a fetal position, stick my thumb in my mouth, and rock back and forth, gibbering the language of a mad idiot.
3 November 2018 at 23:10 #65381Forget “Archie Meets The Punisher.” THIS is the crossover to die for. (Art by Paul Hanley)

-
AuthorPosts


