Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4 August 2013 at 19:25 #15166
hm – older definitely – Capaldi possibly!
4 August 2013 at 19:24 #151614 August 2013 at 19:23 #151574 August 2013 at 19:21 #151554 August 2013 at 19:14 #15144ah – its not a female Doctor then…. ah well
4 August 2013 at 19:11 #15142oh shit – Bonnie Langford is the next Doctor Who
#ohshitbonnielangfordisthenextdrwho
4 August 2013 at 19:09 #15137oh shit – Daniel Roche is the next Doctor Who
#ohshitdanielrocheisthenextdrwho
4 August 2013 at 19:07 #15135breathlessly – @rob – good to see you back.
Not erm, breathlessly you, but, erm y’know the whole thing and , erm…
4 August 2013 at 16:23 #15074so, how do you prepare for a media meshing event?
Start the booze too early and its just clumsy fingers on a keyboard, plugging away and submitting 5 minutes after the incident.
Start the booze too late, and you’re far too sober to be exposed to the nonsense.
Honestly, does Wogan’s autobiography give any tips?
4 August 2013 at 15:57 #15071ah @craig – Rankin is involved in a Capaldi shoot at the mo – so has this become spoilery?
or is it twattery misdirectionary from an admittedly twatteryy photographeryyyyy?or sumfin?
to be honest though, he would be taking the next Doc’s photo regardless who it is, as he’s Rankin and kinda famous for famous portraits.
4 August 2013 at 15:52 #15070if it is Capaldi, 2014 will be an interesting year, as he plays Cardinal Richelieu in The Musketeers next year too…..
Though to be fair, I s’pose they’re both madman-in-a-(sometimeshorsedrawn)-box
4 August 2013 at 15:38 #15066oh, and btw @gothamcelt – I rather liked your idea of David Bradley walking out to be introduced as the “next” Doctor to confused whoops and applause….
4 August 2013 at 15:32 #15065@phaseshift – careful what you wish for #2
I really do do drivel.
4 August 2013 at 14:36 #15055@phaseshift – is it ok to comment now, or does the liveblogging format only really work when its a pure stream of drivel from one person rather than several?
its just that I think it’d be fun us making comments too….
.
oh, and I make 4 (at the very least)
3 August 2013 at 11:22 #14959Oh, and sorry for any Johnny Ball related off-topicings!
@jimthefish – hadn’t realised he’d made those comments… hm, tis a little worrying. Hope he’s ok, but thanks for finding some footage of him in his pomp!
.
ah well, looks like alcohol is the order of the night, along with staring at the on-set Tardis, wondering how bored the new actor sitting in it is, waiting for their cue to walk out amidst dry ice, swirling lights and applause.
and inane questions about content of their pockets…
3 August 2013 at 10:55 #14955hmm….. we can ask questions huh?
“As The Doctor, what will you carry around in your inside left pocket?”
well, will give us a sense of their humour and whether they see The Doctor as practical, odd or silly (or all three!)
;¬)
2 August 2013 at 14:16 #14845@everyone – lol
😉
To be honest, the BBC description made me think that it’d start with Matt on-set somewhere, with Zoe walking up behind him.
He turns, she gets out a big red book and says:“The Doctor – This is Your Lives”
dahhh-dahh daaa dahhhhhhhhh.
cut to the studio, they walk on stage to audience applause.
Other Doctors and Companions are sat in rows on the right of the stage, exchanging knowing winks and nods as Matt sits down with a smirk.Either that or Johnny Ball will jump out of a Dalek.
He’d make a great Doctor.
1 August 2013 at 20:24 #14777@craig @phaseshift
which is why the Spoilers thread is such a good idea
(I for one really appreciate it as I don’t even watch trailers for films!)thanks (yet again)
1 August 2013 at 20:20 #14776@everyone
bloody hell – I leave one gag about guys actually having a clue about relationships and then come back and its all gone…. wibbly wobbly!!
😉
To be honest, I love the debate around scripts and acting, as its really interesting for someone like me who only did a couple of school plays as a kid, rather than work in the industry.
Its great, because as with any art or entertainment, the ‘artwork’ is as much about the viewer’s take on it, as the artist(s) intent.
And I get an insight here to both sides (that I don’t normally see!)thanks!
Now, back to the
“Shipping News”companions and how they took on the role (see what I did there Shazzbot?)😉
31 July 2013 at 23:09 #14712btw – a guy/ bloke/ geezer on a Doctor Who Forum, trying to explain how they understood the inter-relationships between women and men is so amusing that I’ve signed up for a Comic-Con convention.
Mother would’ve been proud.
;¬)
31 July 2013 at 22:29 #14706@shazzbot @bluesqueakpip – from a (ie this) bloke’s point of view, I’d say in these two clips, both girls were quizzing him in a “what are you up to/ what have I got myself into?” as well as a “I’m more sure of my position of ‘strength’ than you are when I pull your leg/ ask leading questions” kind of way.
I must say, you could argue either way as to both your views on Smith’s Doctor, because he vacillates (rather brilliantly on occasions for me) between cock-sure* and completely befuddled with the “sex-stuff”.
He has it both ways** (much like an adolescent).
.
.
* yes – deliberate pun. no, not wearing coat…..
.
** yes – also a deliberate pun but I’ve left too quickly now and not bothered getting my coat
31 July 2013 at 22:09 #14701@wolfweed @janetteb @jimthefish @bluesqueakpip
as if by magic

I have an unwarranted affection for Tortoro, due to the beauty of Ghibli artwork and after seeing an image of him on a branch with the little girls (with one snuggling deep into its fur) and completely ignoring them.
Now that’s alien!
.
.
[I won’t mention that Tortoro riffs on the Japanese for ‘troll’ – and btw I checked out wiki to see if “him” was correct! ;)]
30 July 2013 at 06:30 #1459723 July 2013 at 21:39 #14305jeezus – she’s given birth to a Sontaran!!
That’s amazing!!
.
.
.
I thought they were mass produced in gene-splicing hatcheries.
23 July 2013 at 20:18 #14301@craig – nice work!
that’s brilliant – thank you!
now, what would be hilarious would be if a bug crept in and all the posts in that forum got turned into just the words SPOILERS, SPOILERS, SPOILERS, SPOILERS…”
;¬)
I jest I jest (but its one forum I don’t visit and which is why its such a brilliant idea!)
thanks again
22 July 2013 at 22:15 #1427820 July 2013 at 20:43 #14218but really I loved watching this and this story is great.
Also I’ve loved this one-episode-a-week trial of the Doctor (approximating what was it like), even though actually (now for me) it was a bunch of poor resolution a week episodes on a laptop with alcohol, rather than sitting on the floor watching the telly, with my dad’s left leg reassuringly to the left of me.
20 July 2013 at 20:34 #14217hm, I think we all saw that the bigger ham was Weng Chiang rather than Sin.
(oink oink)
19 July 2013 at 12:55 #1407919 July 2013 at 06:21 #14060Hi @janetteb – I don’t think it’s just you.
A reply to one of my posts (that I saw as an email notification) isn’t appearing either (though I guess there could be other reasons for that)18 July 2013 at 23:09 #14036Hi @iamrosetyler – welcome(!) and I absolutely know you didn’t mean this, but your thought made me think of something.
Groundhog Day for the Doctor.
Have we had that done before??
But, to your point, I can imagine an episode (even a series though that might stretch the conceit) where the characters revisited old shows. Basically similar to how the Claricle showed the Doctor which Tardis to steal.
However, if you really want to know what the old shows were like you’ll have to watch them in all their glory. They could be great, boring, confusing, challenging, emotional, dull…. yep – its a series that’s been going for 50 years!
If you want pointers as to which are the best to see, I’d head over to the Faces of the Doctor thread or the Doctor WHo memories thread.
People moan about the special effects of the time date certain episodes, but the storytelling usually compensates for that (eg The Talons of Weng Chiang)
18 July 2013 at 22:54 #14034doh! @MadScientist72 – arghh you’re right – the cheapest tie-in imaginable!!
Though I’m sure if there was a Mr Potato Head with accompanying Rheon Carbine then it would be available from discerning BBC outlets which only have the most impressive gifts for the discerning Whovian.
No cheap tie-ins and only quality stock – quick, order now before the stampede begins in November!
18 July 2013 at 21:41 #14028hmmm, methinks this topic is wandering into dangerous territory.
It starts with Gingers, but then there’ll be mentions of Jammy Dodgers, Viennese….
Right. I want no more of this.
If we start “Which biscuit would make the best Doctor?”, we are seriously scraping the barrel in terms of topics.
.
honestly, I’ll go crackers.
18 July 2013 at 21:05 #14024@wolfweed – I am assuming they have a Mr Potato Head for Strax?
and if not, why not???!???!??!!!!?
13 July 2013 at 00:06 #13732ah @shazzbot, in terms of why Talking Heads isn’t more popular, I’d warrant a guess that its name-checked a lot by new brit bands (though I sadly don’t actually follow them or less-sadly read the music press).
The 80’s revival is huge at the moment in the UK hipster scene, so Talking Heads etc will be copied and stolen from in un-equal measure.(I’m a big fan of Picasso’s quote on copying and stealing – my take on that quote is to copy is to know something is good but not know why (maybe others have told you or gut feel hasn’t hit critical understanding) – but to steal is to know why its good and therefore to be able to use it in another context or use it to influence another idea).
(oh, I’d waffle on about that annoyingly so will stop as ‘drink has been taken’).
but a lot of post-punk will be namechecked I’d guess (Talking Heads, XTC etc) but its hard to ‘copy’ this clever stuff without sounding derivative (if that bothers them).
12 July 2013 at 23:25 #13726Hi @Shazzbot – before I get into the other stuff, one little memory that Pirates you made me think of was “I am the Pirate Kiiiinnnnngggg” from Pirates of Penzance.
My brother who hummed “Starry starry night, hmm hmmm hm hmm hmmm hm hm hmmm, hmm hmm hm hm hmm hm hmmm, hm hmmm hm hm hm hmmm, starry starry night, hmm hmm hm hmm hmmm hm hm hmmm, hmm hmm hm hm hmm hm hmmm, hm hmmm hm hm hm hmmm [ad nauseum]” happened to be the Pirate King in a school production at the age of 9.
He couldn’t hold a tune in a bucket so thank god this was before phone recording, but fair (school)play to him.
me? I got to play Jesus for a few years. (“Mary, wiarrrryoooweeeeepinnnn?”)
and a welsh bank manager (at the age of 9 or 10???!).
again, thank god noone recorded those school musicals.
unlike these gems about love, (wipe the tears away)on this one, and wonder what the hell this did to the kids creating this classic!
[short 6min doc about Langley School’s Music Project, though leaves you wanting to know much more about the brilliant orchestration and how-the-hell-they-did-it!]
EDIT – I’m now listeningf to this part 2 of langley much better!
12 July 2013 at 22:48 #13721blimey. ok @Shazzbot, I’ll try and reply with something.
before I do, did you see my posts on Byrne? Maybe not if page-loading was an issue but when @phaseshift created this thread, and @craig joined in he and I ping-ponged a couple of tunes including David Byrne.
But a bit useless linking if you can’t open the link(!) so I’ll repost (without embed):
@craig – I also loved Road to Nowhere. It was great and props to you for buying it!
In shame I think the first single I bought was Money for Nothing!
Unfortunately I listened to their other stuff around that time and though I liked some (Blind springs to mind) I should’ve headed straight to their older stuff. ah well, made it a few years later!As a response, I could be a bit obvious and put Sledgehammer (for the animated sequence in the videos) but seems a bit lazy and anyway, the Intruders at the Palace concert I mentioned above had David Byrne headlining with a brass band called Les Miserables.
This song is 2/3 of the way through their performance and is kinda the highlight, so if you’re a completist then head to the first track [Edit: especially Shazzbot if you’re a fan of Byrne as the next link is the payoff from listening from the beginning – or was at least to me].
However, life is short so here’s “In the Future” which begins with some of the most beautiful poetry I have ever heard.hope you enjoy it
and I hope you enjoy it too!
12 July 2013 at 20:52 #13717as for the piracy on the high seas of competing fans…
… I’m seeing the cutaway of two costumed-fans (one Mondas Cyberman, the other an early Borg) talking in the bar…
“yes, of course much was lost in the way the character was developed… I mean, all that emotion“
12 July 2013 at 20:32 #1371311 July 2013 at 06:46 #13602If nothing else, the stage show of Chang’s gives us some drama (“why are you moving the cards??!?”) as well as the rather nice mirroring of Chang’s “magic” cabinet and Chiang’s ‘magic’ cabinet.
I don’t think I saw this as a kid, but I wonder how lost I’d have been wondering whether the Doctor said “Chang” or “Chiang” at times.
I am loving this and everyone’s appreciation and discussion around the writer’s craft – it’s a real education for me!
10 July 2013 at 22:37 #13583just a note to @htpbdet as to why anyone would bother reading your thoughts on Who.
[i’ve tried and failed to get the next sentence right – i used to draw not write and drawing wasn’t my strong point!]
Because your ability to tell your story, brings people closer to feelings that affect them, reminds them of their own lives and losses, how lucky they are and how the future and past should both be appreciated when they can; and all this entwined with a connection to a show that they may have a fondness for.
[crap sentence (far too long) and that illustrates why we prefer reading your thoughts].
If its not the right time to share with others (and by god I’m glad you did with us) then give the option to your loved ones later.
much, much much later if that be the case, but so they have your blessing.
[christ i’m cack-handed with words – that was meant to be short. thanks for sharing with us]
10 July 2013 at 22:02 #13578Hi @Shazzbot – as a male (first time I’ve ever described myself as that as always seemed the least descriptive element!) not sure what you’re looking for, but I can smell a list when one’s being asked for!
:¬)
Now, non-“sexy” (in that its not important whether we men and women find them sexually appealing even if their characterisation includes their attractions to the men in the films) villains on screen could include Kathy Bates in Misery (jeeeezus), and Louise Fletcher as Nurse Ratched in ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’.
Now, I think you want actresses and I’ve named 2 “non-sexy” ones (though either is attractive as is Gina McKee who you underestimate – she has ‘something’ in a way that’s not obvious), but here’s a few literary female villains that may just prompt someone to remember “ooh I saw Fiona Shaw in that” such as Lady Macbeth, Clytemnestra, Medea etc
But were you actually looking for a list of non-sexy villains whose villainy wasn’t due to their non-sexy-ness?
9 July 2013 at 22:51 #13497and finally for tonight @Shazzbot, its funny you mentioned Don Maclean.
My brother used to hum/sing this a lot when I was a kid (he’s 3 years older).
Its catchy and no reason why you wouldn’t hum it, but he used to inwardly smile sometimes and say “that’s my song” which made absolutely no sense to me.
Why the hell would “Starry starry night….” be particularly him??
Baffled me for years.
Then I discovered it was called “Vincent” and the penny dropped
(its my brother’s name)
🙂
9 July 2013 at 22:47 #13496and another for @Shazzbot – agree with the lyrics for 4NonBlondes (who couldn’t… erm the Doctor Who couldn.. I kid, I kid), and I cannot think of a better lyric but weirdly enough, listening to it again for the first time in years, reminded me of this.
Now, the lyric is kinda trite, and well… there’s no excuse… but at the time I really liked it.
Bobby McFerrin – Don’t Worry, Be Happy (similar music for the verse? though obviously a lot less Guns n Roses than 4nonblondes!)
Somehow, despite everything (and there’s a lot of me not liking many aspects of it) I still do have a fondness for it (like much of the music I listened to between 14 and mid twenties….)
9 July 2013 at 22:39 #13495Hi @Shazzbot – apologies for not replying properly sooner, but your selection threw me a nice problem!
Your choices had loads to do with the lyrics (and why wouldn’t they??!!?) bu I’m more of a music person (in same way as with comics the artist is for me the most critical aspect and I can’t see through the crosshatching to see the words).
So… I’ll try and reply with some lyrics (may be a short reply!) 😉
This Guy’s in Love with You by Herb Alpert – well I haven’t listened to this all the way through for a long while but its a great choice lyrically. Don’t worry, I’ve listened to some Jon Spencer to rub the honey from my ears (I jest I jest….. kind’ve!).
So, as a reply, whaddya think about Scott Walker: Best of Both Worlds for Amy’s Choice?
…”And I won’t share you, I couldn’t fare to
It’s time for you to choose
Which one you’d rather lose
Could you love me, And forget me
Are you sorry, That you’ve met me?
What we’ve been through, means nothing to you…”and all with Bond-esque strings!
[warning – can create addictions to bonkers musicians]
9 July 2013 at 21:48 #13493Hi @wolfweed – I’m guessing credit where its due – this guy did the mashup poster (and a few other Doctor related stuff):
7 July 2013 at 20:54 #13312he he – @Shazzbot – thanks very much for the “you are awesome”!
obviously you’ve explained better than I about how his Wonka was doctorish, but “you are awesome” is something I might have written on my grave!
;¬)
(oh and I dont give a damn where the actor is born, as long as they’re good)
7 July 2013 at 20:08 #13305well, obviously we’re all bored with speculation, but who could resist wondering if this marriage of Hollywood and deepest darkest Englishness couldn’t have borne a brilliant American Doctor
it might be truly my imagination but…..
hats are cool.
3 July 2013 at 21:01 #13139right – now after watching 3 of those royal clips, I gotta get me some of dat Geek Dating.
What’s the etiquette on a geek date?
Questionnaire on first 3 doctors, with no multiple choice?
.
or just minor cosplay
(Oh, I don’t know, maybe just bring my own Ood translator)?
.
[erm, or was it just me getting those youtube ads?]
1 July 2013 at 22:33 #13067Now, my memories of McCoy…. are a bit odd.
Basically, I’d stopped watching during Colin Baker’s reign and saw a couple of McCoy’s but not really followed it much. Seeing the documentaries shared on this forum, makes me think I was probably put off by the “light entertainment” element, and things like Robin of Sherwood for breaking the Who habit. And if you can’t say Robin of Sherwood without half-singing “the hooded man” in a Clannad-inspired way, then you know what I mean.
So, I won’t bore you with my non-memories.
Instead (I’ll bore you with) a too-short story of being invited by a female work colleague that I kinda fancied, for dinner in ~2001. I went to the address she gave me and it was a typical (for me) North London arty terraced house – lots of small original hand-drawn sketches and limited prints on the walls, literary clutter etc etc.
In fact, as I looked at the bookshelf I saw there were half a dozen annuals and books of the McCoy era Doctor with Ace on the shelves.
“Do you live here?”
“No – I’m flat sitting”
“Who does live here?”
“Oh I don’t know him, he’s a friend of someone I know. Actor I think”
“Jeezus – this is Sylvester McCoy’s house!”
“Who?” [add your own “who’s on third?” gag here]
I looked again at the artwork on the walls – lots of clowns, jesters, Commedia dell Arte etc.
“Jeezus – this is Sylvester McCoy’s house!”
“Who?”[sigh]
as this conversation wasn’t going anywhere, I started to concentrate on her rather than the house.
That didn’t go anywhere either.Lovely woman. Lovely house. and now I realise a lovely guy.
Hope he doesn’t mind me failing to woo a woman in his gaff.
-
AuthorPosts


