Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
5 October 2013 at 20:32 #17897
@shazzbot
I’d do it as a Post this time. The Forum updates for the Next Doctor were just a formating experiment, which I did learn from so I’d be a little more prepared this time.
On the saucy pictures side, I’m sure it depends on how long you spend in the pub!
5 October 2013 at 20:26 #17896OK – I still think Christmas Carol and Snowmen are better, but watching this again made me remember how strikingly different this is, and why I do enjoy it.
It helps to watch it shortly after the madness of Wedding of River Song, rather than have a gap. This is quite a good understated Coda to that episode, with the Doctor obviously keeping as low a profile as possible for someone who’s blowing up spaceships.
It all feels low key and intimate. After Christmas Carol, with a bad man who can be redeemed, we have an episode without a real enemy at all. The comic relief of the Androzani characters are the nearest you get, as the inept faces of commercial exploitation (and I still think the slight satire of saving the forest at Christmas is quite sly).
It’s Matt’s show though. He’s hilarious as ever, but it’s the scenes where he quietens down that can stop you in his tracks. His combination of sudden awkwardness and empathy as he explains to Madge why she’s getting so angry are fantastic. I also love the final scene with the Doctor “going home” to the Ponds. It’s emotional, but I think veers well clear of the rocks of mawkishness.
Oh – and can I just say that, like Christmas Carol and Snowmen, this is a visual treat.
There was a short prequel to it that went out, which I’ll embed below. It doesn’t add that much, but in the absence of a confidential, what the hell.
4 October 2013 at 23:47 #17852I should have guessed Cineworld because they have a track record of showing niche stuff like the occasional Bollywood picture and BBC/C4 Films. If you are all in the mood, it might be worth keeping an eye on.
There was a rumour (for anyone in or near Bradford) that Pictureville, which is associated with the Media Museum was in negotiation for it as well. That would tie in with their “fan” anniversary celebration mentioned previously on this thread and this recently announced “Family half term” Doctor Who event.
4 October 2013 at 23:11 #17850After the announcement that plans to show the 50th special in cinemas were confirmed in general, this might be of interest to anyone who is actively seeking to watch the spectacle surrounded by people you don’t know, with colds you’ll inevitably get, munching loudly on popcorn, and with annoying mobile phone ring tones (which sums up my last experience of cinema, oh so many years ago).
It’s an article about a celebration day at Cineworld in Crawley, which features a guest appearance by Dorium (probably with body – 3D special effects aren’t that good).
Interesting though is this line:
On November 23 – 50 years to the day since the show was launched – Cineworld cinemas across the country are expected to be showing the BBC’s anniversary episode in 3D simulcast.
Apparently details to be finalised in the next couple of weeks. So check your Cineworld availability now. I have one in nearby Wakefield, but I will make do with my TV and other vital ingredients such as booze.
4 October 2013 at 20:24 #17847@craig – Yeah, deeply annoying.
Good idea about the e-mail. I’ve no problem with issuing my own to many regulars, but a public facing blank e-mail address would be good to put on the blog. I’d rather volunteer than the thought of anybody desperately fiddling when they should be enjoying the convention they’ve paid good money for though.
I could launch it early in the week as a placeholder with a “what do you intend to do”, and fill out ATL at a later date. All titbits/pics/recipes (saucy or otherwise – and I’m talking pics not recipes) gratefully received.
4 October 2013 at 15:58 #17841Well if the Sixth Doctor was the charmless Doctor, I think you could make a case for Ten having siphoned it off somehow. Because if there was a way to bottle charm David Tennant would be a richer man than he is even now. Somehow, the announcement of his casting just made me shrug “Yep”. He’d just been in the Russell T Davies Casanova, and it seemed like an obvious choice. A lot is made of him being a relative unknown, but I’m not sure how much of that is true. I seem to remember him in loads of stuff, going back to Rab C & Taking over the Asylum (an astonishing performance and highly recommended).
I’ll be frank in that a really big problem for me with 10 is the end of his story. The orgy of sentiment and final lines that really stay in my memory for all the wrong reasons. Memory of them actually seems to amplify every other moment (and there were many) that Ten was miserable about something. The lonely God shtick can hang heavy over a performance that is actually a lot of fun, and very adept.
“I’m sorry – I’m so, so sorry”
The Tenth Doctor. A lot. Yes – the angst is strong in this one
His intro in Christmas Invasion was muted by a story that wasn’t all that great, but he gives a barnstorming performance after he gets out of bed. I found Series 2 a mixed bag so all hail the beast, for it is Impossible Planet/the Satan Pit that stand out for me, alongside Girl in the Fireplace and the nostalgia fest that is School Reunion. The departure of Rose (part 1) in Doomsday was well handled I thought.
Series 3 I still have mixed feelings about. Nothing wrong with Tennant’s performance, but the entire “pining for Rose” thing went on a bit. The back end of the series is where I find the quality, with Blink, Human Nature/Family of Blood (his characterisation of John Smith is very good) and Utopia.
So for my money – Series 4 is the best of his runs. For a large part shorn of any angst, he and Donna seem a very fresh pairing. I have to say I think Catherine Tate as Donna was superb foil, absolutely nailing having her very high expectations of life with the Doctor crushed early on, but working on with enthusiasm. I think it’s also the real time that Russell allowed himself to stand back from the showrunner “Big Bright High Budget Bonanza” and produce two very different episodes with Midnight (a great showcase for Tennant) and Turn Left (similarly for Tate). It’s a series with far fewer duds than the previous 2 for me.
The specials weren’t really that special (with the possible exception of Waters of Mars) and when viewing them retrospectively seem to be overblown in the wrong departments. A real shame.
Tennant did a huge amount to maintain and increase the popularity of the show though. I can understand why he’s become the reference Doctor to many who are more familiar with the AG years. For me though, Ten’s reign is characterised by a great number of “standout scenes” rather than being a personality in his own right. Maybe I just need a little distance from the period?
Like his father in law, he takes a self mocking stance on his role as the Doctor – here with Catherine Tate in a sketch for Comic Relief. What a hero.
4 October 2013 at 15:53 #17840A bit late this month, but as it’s 50 days till the 50th, and this one is certain to re-appear, does anyone have any thoughts on this chap – One David Tennant?
4 October 2013 at 15:45 #17839Happy “it’s 50 days to the 50th Anniversary” Day. I hope you are all celebrating (it is a Friday, after all).
@shazzbot – yeah, sorry about that. Been so busy through the week recently, I actually forgot it was the end of the month on Monday. Silly me. Soon be rectified.
@craig – on covering the 50th Anniversary, the celebration of Marriage that forced us not to get tickets is, apparently, not going ahead. I wished they could have decided on their irreconcilable differences earlier, inconsiderate Bastards.
Still – with no tickets, and still in Yorkshire, I can maintain a blog for the celebratory weekend if required. If enough people want to e-mail, or give me their “tweet feeds” (is that youth speak?) I can update it like the attempt to liveblog the announcement of Peter Capaldi. I will demand titbits of gossip from the convention floor, “what you are doing at home” stories and embarrassing pictures of the inaugural meeting of the Doctor Who Forum, in its natural habitat, the Pub. Just an idea for your thought magimix.
29 September 2013 at 14:27 #17677I must admit, I thought Atlantis a bit stilted in places, but there was enough to make me want to tune in. I had similar feelings when Merlin first started and ended up enjoying it as a romp. It helps to have people like Mark Addy in a comic role (very like his squire in A Knights Tale). Nice to see Alexander Siddig, even though he didn’t get much to do as the King, and it took me a while to realise that was Sarah “Empress of Racnoss” Parish as the Queen.
If I had one hope for this, it’s that as it develops it might play with a bit more off-the-wall humour. A bit like Xena used to do. I still have happy memories of that show because it did comedy really well. Still find myself bursting into Joxer the Mighty every now and again.
29 September 2013 at 00:52 #17658I do hope we have people who are familiar with this hashtag thingy who can keep me appraised of developments. Something to do with “twitter” isn’t it?
#oldandconfusedmalevolententity
29 September 2013 at 00:49 #17657@bluesqueakpip @scaryb @jimthefish
It’s interesting that more footage has been filmed for the trailer. No real spoilers here (because I have no details) other than there are prequel bits supposedly being filmed which they probably did when the gang got back together for the Christmas special filming.
I guess they wanted a narrative framing for the trailer which may have only been just worked out. That takes you outside the action of clips as it were. When the series was relaunched, Chris Ecclestone did one which I embeded on the Faces thread (“You wanna come with me”) and I think I’m right (although could be wrong) in saying it was the last thing he filmed for the series.
29 September 2013 at 00:36 #17656Also forgot to mention an ace performance from Karen Gillan here as she unleashes a lot of anguish on Kovarian. She really knocks that one out of the park.
29 September 2013 at 00:32 #17655I’d forgotten how much sheer fun this episode was.
Yep, it’s absolutely mad, which is why I really like it. I’ve said it before, but you really never know what the hell is coming in a series finale since SM took over, and that brings a bit of joy to proceedings. The sights of the alternative Universe are breathtaking, and the cameos and references just pile on top of each other. I think though, the fact that this is actually one of the most direct pieces of storytelling in the arc (even accounting for the flashbacks) makes it hang together.
There are so many good scenes in this, but I think my favourites have to be Smith and McNeice wandering the halls of the senate (“Hell in high hells” “Tell me more!”), and The Doctor ineptly attempting matchmaker with Rory and Amy (“she’d like to go out with you for texting and scones.” “You really haven’t done this before, have you?”).
Add the “Marriage” on top of the Pyramid, and the reveal of the Doctor turning foreknowledge to his advantage, and it’s a fine cap to the series.
Looking back, Series 6, I think, is the strongest for me since the revival. What a way to end it. Even with dodgy beard!
29 September 2013 at 00:26 #17654stevethewhistle @bluesqueakpip
Ahhh – those were the days. I was at University when COSHH first came in and remember the outrage from an organics Professor when informed he couldn’t brew beverages in the lab AND had a number of his favourite carcinogenic chemicals withdrawn from use.
I remember him saying (or more accurately shouting) “Safety, SAFETY – they’re only undergraduates for god’s sake, nobody will miss a few!”
29 September 2013 at 00:25 #17653Yes, it is nicely paced this episode. The Doctor trying to do a bunk in this period of exile was actually repeated a few times, with Pertwee largely unrepentant (just a little embarrassed it hadn’t worked). I always quite liked the fact that, in the future, the Doctor wins his freedom and then can’t seem to leave until he regenerates. He just takes “little trips”. I’ve always felt that contrariness was central to the Doctors character in many ways.
I know it’s a weird thing, but when UNIT troll up in the average 70s looking saloon, it makes me crease with laughter. They should have had a Maxi for this one – they weighed more than a light tank for the period, I’m sure, and would have crushed those Autons. Again though, a little bit of creative genius with the telephone flex idea.
I still find those carnival heads for the Daffodils distributors pretty unnerving. Probably more than the unmasked Autons themselves.
28 September 2013 at 12:29 #17625@shazzbot
Is it “worthy” to point out that Hartnell was the only Doctor to have someone (the rather more high profile Peter Cushing) playing another interpretation of his character in films at the time? He may simply have felt that the concept was strong enough to carry on in whatever form, and he had first hand experience that no-one is irreplaceable.
28 September 2013 at 12:22 #17624Oh – and this also made me smile on the Huffington Post,
Pat Higgins on Doctor Who’s 50th Anniversary Show Should Ignore the Fans
28 September 2013 at 12:18 #17622The Gs gone a bit Doctor Who heavy this weekend I see.
Jenny Colgan on Who love.
And the written interviews separated into 60s-70s, 80s-90s and 2005 onwards.Also a written interview with Charlie Higson on his 9th Doctor Book.
22 September 2013 at 11:27 #175112011 was a really bad year for the memory of Hitler. If you’ve enjoyed the sight of Rory punching Hitler and stuffing him in a cupboard, you may be delighted by what happened to him in Misfits, again in 2011 in this 30 second clip.
In order to prevent a time change that has granted Hitler early access to micro-electronics (a mobile phone) super powered delinquent Kelly sorts him out in her usual direct manner.
22 September 2013 at 11:24 #17510@shazzbot
I agree with @bluesqueakpip in that I don’t find it condescending. Kids can be quite sophisticated and very direct. Perhaps because they don’t try to second guess what is being shown to them, actively looking for holes, etc.
The other thing about kids is that we raise them on fairytales with some fairly Grimm content. Young princess separated from her parents and being raised by cruel parent substitute is practically a cliché to them, I would have thought.
22 September 2013 at 11:10 #17509Whenever I see the fate of McDermott, the Monty Python line “oh no! Not the comfy chair!!” leaps to mind. I suppose fan consciousness always locks the Autons as animated shop window mannequins, but I admire Holmes for trying different sort of approaches for plastic initiated death in this story. When you consider how prevalent plastic has become, you can’t help but feel there is a lot of unexplored potential for the Nestenes.
The story is a bit of a slave to the production values off the time, but its worth dwelling on the impact of this story, as there was a bit of a media furore surrounding it. The Commissioner of the Met said the reveal of the policemen as Autons had “set back community policing by a decade”. The more cynical among us would suggest that, in the 70s, setting back community policing was entirely the remit of the Police force.
It culminated in a very boring debate in the House of Lords on the effect of TV on the nation, with Doctor Who being mentioned a lot, and this serial (the Doll, and the Policeman) being cited as “too scary for children”. As they pontificated on the issues, I’m sure it never occurred to them that they were contributing to the best free advertising pitch in history. Viewing figures did very well.
21 September 2013 at 23:20 #17498Evening all – unexpected visitors is what it says on my note for being late. Watched this earlier today, and will get round to Terror tomorrow I think.
It’s odd, but this and Bells of St. John (both occurring after a mid-series break) left me a bit bemused on first watch. Lots of good points, but slightly off-kilter. With Bells a second watch sorted it out pretty quickly, but no matter how much I watch Let’s Kill Hitler, I’m never completely sure about it.
I think after the relatively slow reveal of the River mystery this tries to do too much in 45 minutes, and a lot gets lost in competition between ideas. I think it may have been better to stretch the central ideas out over two episodes – the reveal that Mels was to become River, the regeneration, a bit of fun with the Tesselecta and then disappear for a couple of episodes (still as a potential bad guy), and then do the entire redemption thing on another day. It may have left the people who moan about River with even more to moan about, but bugger them.
Still, even SM episodes that don’t work completely have enough in them to give you a entertaining ride. Rivers lines, the Doctor trying to select an avatar for his TARDIS, Rory punching Hitler and locking him in a cupboard. Dull it’s not.
For additional information, here is a Q&A from the first showing of the episode to press and fans just prior to release of 6.2 at the BFI. It features SM, MS, Karen, Arthur and Caroline Skinner.
20 September 2013 at 16:21 #17458On the trailer front, it’s actually unusual for the BBC to go outside their guidelines of promoting a show outside of a month of televising it, except for an “event” (which I think this would count as).
I can’t help thinking that the replacement for Merlin – Atlantis is shown on Sat 28 Sep at 20:25. A canny controller may wish to promote the show with a well publicised showing of a trailer people are baying for beforehand?
Wait and see I guess.
20 September 2013 at 16:10 #17457@bluesqueakpip – God bless HDD recorders. It’s worth sticking past the first couple of episodes, as it gets a lot more involved. The G’s other regular genre fanboy Phelim O’Neil put a column up just after I posted. It doesn’t contain any more spoilers than the BBC America promotion, but if you want to remain completely unspoilt, avoid until you’ve watched tonights episodes.
http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2013/sep/20/orphan-black-sci-fi-thriller
20 September 2013 at 13:23 #17455I think both @pedant and I have mentioned this in the past, but if anyone wants to watch some BBC America produced content, Orphan Black gets is UK showing starting tonight.
It made one of the Guardian choices, and they say:
A bizarre coincidence leads orphaned hustler Sarah (Tatiana Maslany) to assume what she thinks to be a profitable new identity as her “twin” Beth Childs. In episode one, Sarah and partner-in-crime Felix discover that there’s a price to pay for adopting the Beth identity, while the second instalment sees Sarah/Beth on the run from a killer as she searches for pieces of the puzzle that connect the women: a gripping doppelgänger drama with dark twists.
Putting my comments about some bizarre accents to one side, I’d recommend it. Tatiana Maslany really brings different physical quirks to the different roles. Its relative success has guaranteed it a second series, so it’s not one of those where you’ll be left high and dry at the end of the first run. It starts tonight as a double bill from 9pm on BBC3.
15 September 2013 at 17:45 #17358@jimthefish @Shazzbot
It looks like a lot of us are doing extra homework! 😀 I agree with Jims comments about Dougray Scott. Great in Enigma and in Crow Road.
I took the meaning of Hide to be the hidden motivations and feelings with the Professor, Doctor and Clara to be honest. All seem to be hiding behind a facade.
15 September 2013 at 17:37 #17357@shazzbot
I don’t know if it was deliberate or not, but I think it’s worth noting the real influence that this period had on the three reboots for the show after cancellation. I think there is a real reason and rationale behind it.
It’s generally known now that the BBC had some thoughts of cancelling the show towards the end of the Troughton run. It’s well regarded by fans, but it wasn’t the force it was in terms of Audience anymore. What probably saved it was the advent of colour, and people felt a fresh approach to the show might make it a good showcase.
Hence Spearhead from Space relaunched the show in colour (another Robert Holmes script with Autons) and after a mixed reception to some stories in its first series, suddenly found its feet during this period. Audiences really grew again. Pertwee did a lot of that himself promoting the show at all kind of events, and Baker carried that approach forward.
All the attempts to relaunch appeared to have looked at Spearhead for inspiration. For the McGann movie you had nicking the cloths from the hospital, motorbike races, a contemporary setting, the Master, etc. For RTD he took the Autons in a contemporary setting for Rose, and for SM, he had another clothes lift from a hospital, contemporary setting and a thrilling drive with a Fire Engine (Pertwee once joked it was about the only vehicle he hadn’t driven).
I think Spearhead is seen as one of those successes in changing the direction of a show, but it just depends upon the elements you take from it.
15 September 2013 at 17:32 #17356I rewatched this recently. Once you know that a lot of the aliens were concept designs accumulated over the life of the show, it can be interesting to see if you can work out what episodes/species they were for.
One that really interested me though was in the Market place, and I wondered if it was a concept for the Ice Warriors before they went for CGI in the end. It’s the mouth that tends to make me think this. I tried a couple of screen grabs and an edit to show what I meant (thanks for @craig for the upload).
15 September 2013 at 01:55 #17328I actually popped in because when I was in York I was reminded of a bit of genius that touches on Doctor Who. So a post with a lot of links, some to do with Who! And a question – Is there a more loveable nerd than Neil Hannon in music?
This is the bloke who wrote the Father Ted theme (remind yourself) and then released a lyric version that turned it into a lament of teenage lust in “Songs of Love”:
Got Daniel Radcliffe to appear on a “Duckworth Lewis Method” cricketing themed spin-off due to some tangential involvement by Hannon with the Jarvis Cocker fronted Wyrd Sisters in the Harry Potter movies.

Very Fifth DoctorAnd was also Murray Golds first choice as vocalist on a couple of big band productions for Who had he been available. Here is his version of “Love Don’t Roam”, the song playing at Donna’s reception in Runaway Bride.
And here is his version of “Song for Ten”.
What a bloody nerd! Oh – his version of “Word Up” by Cameo is fantastic as well. No bright red codpieces, but plenty of banjo.
Any other nominations for nerd of the decade gratefully received.
15 September 2013 at 01:41 #17327Ah @jimthefish, I missed that reply to me originally. I really must give Six Feet Under another try. I watched a couple of episodes just before my mother died, and it really lost any attraction about that time.
15 September 2013 at 00:48 #17325Indeed – I think that extra element of the “innocent” of the baby being at peril adds the icing to the cake of jeopardy, raising the stakes.
I keep thinking the Crib should have more resonance, but the one thing that really does surprise me about it is that BBC Worldwide don’t market a copy of it, available from all good nerd Childcare stores. Surely that would be a seller?
I was watching the scene with Colonel Runaway though with an eye to who else has played the Doctor who I could imagine doing it in that slightly subdued “quivering with anger” sort of way, and the two that immediately came to mind with McCoy and Davison, which surprised me.
15 September 2013 at 00:20 #17320Oooooh – cover envy. That’s new! I had the rather less scary:

Still the same internal illustrations though.
I don’t find Pertwee chimes with much of my ideal of the Doctor, but I think I appreciate him a lot more than others. I think there is at least some explanation that he’s being difficult because he’s in the last place he wants to be. He is no Six, who dials the unpleasant aspect to 11 with no apparent reason. His relationships with companions always seemed to have bad starts but grew with some affection to become enjoyable.
14 September 2013 at 23:03 #17313Gosh – your childhood sounds worthy of a Doctor Who adventure itself!
My introduction to the Master was Deadly Assassin as well, although I’d read at least one book before that was shown (The Daemons) and it didn’t really resonate with me that it was the same person (I was still a bit young). My adventure of discovery with Delgado came later. I’ve said it before in argument with @htpbdet that I also think Ainley isn’t as bad as some make out. Delgado had a limited run of creatives carefully presenting a consistent approach. Ainley had about 5 or 6 script editors. When he had good material and direction he really delivered the goods. I still think Survival shows the work he and Sylvester put in to make their scenes gripping against the odds. When it was bad (Mark of the Rani springs to mind) he was bad.
The way companions work (or sometimes don’t) always intrigues me. I thought Liz was great when I saw her as a teenager, but I’m not sure if I would have automatically been drawn to her as a child? Jo is often presented as the “typical airhead” even though some of her skills later become apparent. The ones that really stand out for me though are Jamie and Leela. Two of the less developed (in a technology sense) companions who seem to get away with being dumb, through being very clever in their own way. I think those two stand out as examples of how companions don’t necessarily have to be from a “contemporary” period to make the audience bond with them. I’d still love to see if the new show could introduce a companion like that, and what audience reaction would be like. My guess is that if they were bright, inquisitive “children” like Jamie and Leela, the younger audience would take them to them in an instant.
14 September 2013 at 21:32 #17298You know – I’ve seen the Doctor angry and frustrated on many occasions, holding forth on some intergalactic injustice or other. I think, with Doctor 11 and this attack on his friends it’s the first time I really remember absolute incandescent fury, and Matt Smith really pulls it off.
@juniperfish’s comments on the debate on whether he is a good man reminds us perhaps on the current issue of what it takes to carry “The Name of the Doctor”. The many rules he feels obliged to respect, and surely he goes to the brink of them here? It’s bloody fun though, as he and Rory the Roman go a bit mental, blowing up Cyber-fleets, gathering an army and introducing the Whoniverse to the Patermoster Gang (still the best bunch of spinoff characters for a loooong time – Sorry Torchwood fans).
Lots of laughs, but as ever with Matt Smith it’s the scenes where he does something different, like the contemptuous exchange with “Colonel Runaway” and his anguished run towards the trap his friends are in as Kovarian revels in her “to fool you twice in the same way – it’s a privilege” that stick in the mind. Great stuff.
14 September 2013 at 20:53 #17297Spearhead was unusual in that most of it was proper film. It’s recently got a Blu Ray release because of that (I think the only BG series that can be upscaled to that quality). Not sure if the transfer will be kind to the tentacle acting at the end of it. Even the bog standard DVD transfer looks great compared to many serials of the period though.
I also thought that the effects of the turning radio-telescopes wasn’t very realistic
I’d visited Jodrell Bank as a young teenager before watching this, and yes, those radio telescopes here really do swish around don’t they?
BTW I have never been a big fan of the Master
Burn the heretic! 😈
14 September 2013 at 20:48 #17296@shazzbot
Just put him down as a general Time Lord jailor. He was the character I mentioned on my Time Lord blog with a natty taste in Savile Row gear and no inclination to help hunt a renegade at all.
14 September 2013 at 20:03 #17293I just worked out that I was 13 months old when this was first broadcast, so it is before my original viewing experience. Still loving it though.
We’ve jumped into a couple of Doctors and companions adventures with 4 and 7, and then saw a regeneration episode for 5. Only natural I suppose to cover the introduction to a companion then, and here we do with Jo Grant.
One thing about this period that (in my experience anyway) throws a few people, is jarring scene transfers. A few people I’ve tried to introduce it to suggest it seems a little piecemeal in approach, and I think I know where they are coming from. Once you get used to the approach though, there is a lot to like.
If you’ve only ever seen the AG years, the one thing you can understand is how the Doctor loves his bizarre lifestyle travelling through time and space. With the Third Doctor, he is denied that freedom and confined to Earth. Hence, he’s more than a little grumpy and prone to pick arguments with authority figures.
Jo’s introduced as a wide eyed novice to the spy world of UNIT. I love the little confrontation with the Brig as he suggests that, if the Doctor wants rid of her, he should be the one to do it. The little gleam in his eye suggests he knows that this is a battle he will win. What’s astonishing considering the legends that have built up around the Brig and the Doctor is how little time they actually spend together even in this, their most active partnership. In the scenes they do share there is a growing understanding in their little games of one-upmanship however.
Jo replaced the Third Doctors original companion, Liz Shaw. It was a shame it was all done off screen, but the reveal that Liz had stormed off complaining that all the Doctor wanted was someone to hand him his test tubes still makes me laugh, because it just seems to sum up Liz. Having a scientist as a companion was a great idea, but showed some of the problems in writing for a companion like that. She was either baffled by the weird science of the Doctor, or they were exchanging technobabble. In many ways the companion is there to ask the stupid questions, and I sometimes wonder if Jamie and Jo are so well remembered because that’s what they did so well.
It’s hard to believe that easily swayed plastic factory owner Rex Farrell is played by Michael Wisher, who went on to play an altogether more domineering character in Genesis of the Daleks:

Above all though – Delgado. He has few words here, but perhaps the quietness is all it needs? It’s hard to equate the Master of this period to the modern lunatic. Poor Goodge. Our first introduction to tissue compression elimination, and the delights of leaving a shrunken corpse as a calling card. He never even got to eat the egg he didn’t want!
14 September 2013 at 14:30 #17261@chickenelly @janetteb + @wolfweed
IO9 also reported on the “protest” with a couple of videos which might interest you. There is the higher quality film of the 2011 intro (no audience participation), but also the very funny 2010 film which sets up a lot of the jokes, and features a small cameo by the ever awesome Sheridan Smith.
http://observationdeck.io9.com/ex-doctor-who-stars-protest-due-to-lack-of-classic-doct-1277303301
13 September 2013 at 22:39 #17228There’s irony. As you came back to North Yorkshire from West Cumbria, you may have passed my in-laws travelling back from York to Whitehaven. Hope you waved.
13 September 2013 at 22:39 #17227Good work on the Sofa lost property tally. In the coinage collection we got the equivalent of £2.27 in Great British Earth Currency, and a signed postcard of Colin Baker addressed to “my number one fan” which, in the right hands, is of incalculable value on the Rings of Akhaten.
All have been donated to our usual charity.
13 September 2013 at 21:42 #17219“I am the Bad Wolf. I create myself. I take the words, I scatter them in time and space. A message to lead myself here.”
Rose – Parting of the Ways (watch the end 15 minutes to see her scatter the words)
The thing about Bad Wolf, I think, is that it has been foreshadowed by mentions for Rose and Wolf in series 7b, “Hungry Like the Wolf” in Cold War for example.
In SMs “Fairytale” approach, I can’t help thinking of the Big Bad Wolf, and “a wolf in sheep’s clothing” which would point to a very dark being presenting himself as the Doctor. But if you extrapolate that to a Bad “wolf in sheep’s clothing” would it be someone whose reputation is more fearsome than is actually true? I think SM has shown himself to be a fan of those ideas of perception of history being false and subject to the whims of historians (his description of the being in the Pandorica, for example) and wouldn’t be surprised if he went for it again.
I do like the thought that this will be some kind of redemption/acceptance episode and the HurtDoctor may require re-appraisal.
13 September 2013 at 16:16 #17206@danmartinuk – welcome! Hope the new position as Entertainment Editor of Buzzfeed is treating you well (after all the times I’ve whored this site on your columns on the Guardian, some payback must be due). 😉
Very generous write-up for Trials. Few will be happy though. Someone on Twitter seems to be warning Ian Levine about his namecheck, so if it comes to blows, just remember he’s a big lad and slow. Quick jabs, dodge and weave!
Looking forward to the McCoy period. Remembrance followed by Curse of Fenric?! or is that a state secret?
13 September 2013 at 15:24 #17204@danmartinuk has a great sense of timing. On my first day back he reviews “Trial of a Time Lord” in his continuing series.
http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2013/sep/13/trial-timelord-doctor-who-classic-episode13 September 2013 at 13:28 #17203On the subject of the BFI showings, after a long delay they uploaded an extract for the Seventh Doctor with McCoy, Sophie Aldred & Ben Aaranovitch talking about that period.
And for the Ninth Doctor, Producer Phil Collinson, director Joe Ahearne and actor Bruno Langley
Charlie Higson video discusses Doctor Who and his book for the Ninth Doctor.
Also of interest, if they ever make a docu-drama about the return of Doctor Who, this meeting between Jan Tranter and Russell T Davies would have to be filmed for light relief. It’s from (a pretty Bizarre choice) a documentary on the Green Death DVD release.
13 September 2013 at 13:18 #17202Ahhh. Thanks for finding that. Shame it’s Paul McGann lite, but I get the feeling he’s bored by saying all the same things about the Movie. Very surprised they didn’t touch on the Audio as Nick Briggs was there, and BBC Worldwide gets its cut from the sales. Daphne Ashbrook and Yee Jee Tso have gone on to do some Big Finish stuff of their own (different characters in UNIT). Apparently, their characters in the Movie are tied up in torturous legal rights issues which means they are “time locked” to the Movie.
I liked the glint in SMs eye when talking about the kiss. I had the feeling he wanted to say – “yeah, but he didn’t sweep her off her feet with lustful intent did he?”
I think Ashbrook will be appearing with McGann for the BFI showing for the Eight Doctor, which is scheduled for October now.
13 September 2013 at 13:12 #17201I didn’t know Day of the Daleks was one of SMs favourites, but I can understand why. For a show based on time travel, there are relatively few stories that delve into that territory in the BG years.
Thanks for the pricing on the DVD as well. I’ve been holding off purchasing the DVD until it came down in price a bit (I had the VHS) but have been looking forward to seeing the Special Edition. No longer will the grand invasion at the end be by 3 Daleks and about 4 Ogrons! The new CGI for disintegration effects look whizzy as well (yes – I am that shallow).
13 September 2013 at 11:26 #17196@blenkinsopthebrave @bluesqueakpip
You know, the first thing that popped into my head when hearing the title was Day of the Daleks, but I was thinking more about the speculation that the “end point” of Trenzalore might be a false future based on a Paradox. That was largely what that Dalek story was about – the Daleks using a Paradox to re-write the human future to their advantage.
So I still like the idea that Trenzalore will be shown to be a false future, and by eliminating that potential we ditch concepts like the Valeyard (which SM has helpfully tied to Trenzalore by mention in Name of the Doctor). If Capaldi turns out to be the thirteenth incarnation of “the Time Lord most often called the Doctor” we can have a nice arc about that, and leave him unencumbered by the 12 regenerations issue into the future.
13 September 2013 at 11:23 #17195Nice to see you back with us! As a fan-fiction fan I hope you caught @jimthefish s and @wolfweed s contributions on the blogs.
I just got back from a stay in York which was a little depressing (to see it become even more of a homogenised McCity since I was last there). So I’m catching up on the news of a potential Who smorgasbord in November.
Glad you enjoyed Nine Worlds. It’s one of the ones I may hit myself in the future as I’ve heard a few good reports about the atmosphere.
8 September 2013 at 16:23 #17084You did have to love the identical cousin thing. Even in actual rare recorded cases of two identical twins marrying two identical twins, the kids were very different. 😀
And an excellent bowl by @scaryb with The Massacre. Completely forgot about that one.
8 September 2013 at 14:37 #17079@bluesqueakpip @tardisblue @jimthefish
I think it was @arkleseizure in the first part of this blog that raised the point of just how often entire plot lines used to revolve around a member of the TARDIS crew meeting a convenient doppelganger to enable a plot. I think the lesson is – all of space and time, but so few faces to go round. So let’s play
Who’s who?
Spot the difference in Enemy of the World, as Doctor 2 meets Salamander.

A bizarre Two Doctors episode, or is Doctor Six about to shoot Doctor Five, before pressing the button to vaporise him in Arc of Infinity. A story that is actually twice as long as Fires of Pompeii, but can feel twice as long as Children of Earth.

Doctor Who and the Two Romanas? Just before she became Romana II, Lalla Ward was in the preceding story The Armageddon Factor. Romana I apparently liked the face of Princess Astra.

It’s a taste she probably got after visiting Tara, in which she was a dead ringer for Princess Strella in Androids of Tara. In a story which also featured android duplicates of Romana and Strella, that was an awful lot of Mary Tamm for your money.
Nyssa also turned out to have a co-evolutionary developed doppelganger in Black Orchid.
-
AuthorPosts


