Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
19 April 2014 at 17:45 #26985
I didn’t see this when it was first aired. I forgot that it was on and when I realised it was I had already missed the first half, so I didn’t bother to watch the rest. My philosophy is that if you’re going to watch something, watch the whole thing, there’s no point in only watching part of something.
Anyway back the episode, I quite liked it when I first saw it. This was just after I had watched the rest of series 2 and at that point I still liked the tenth doctor so I was disappointed that he was unconscious for most of the episode but the last 10 minutes when he was awake were fantastic, again I liked the tenth doctor when I was 11, now I just yell out a variation of Obi Wan’s “you were the chosen one” speech from Revenge of the Sith whenever he’s onscreen. I found the humour that makes up the most of the rest of the episode forced even back then. The running gag about Harriet Jones was cute the first time they did it but it got irritating quickly. I guess this is what happens when you model your series after Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
I guess it’s one of the better Christmas specials, but that’s really not saying much.19 April 2014 at 16:12 #26966@whisht
Common People is actually my favourite song of all time, but I love the Shatner version almost as much.Speaking of bizzare cover versions….
16 April 2014 at 16:42 #26915@blenkinsopthebrave
Geoffrey Burgon also did the music for Seeds of Doom and Life of Brian.16 April 2014 at 07:04 #26905You may remember this being used in The Simpsons
Next here’s the closing theme from the BBC adaptation of Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy
13 April 2014 at 19:38 #26865@jimthefish It’s not that I think that he’s a bad writer, it’s just that, as @phaseshift suggested, I don’t particularly like him as a writer. I can’t speak for his non-who work as I haven’t watched any of it, but there are very few of his Who episodes that I would call good.
By the way the RTD2 thing is a Star Wars reference. Not that I think that Russell is anything like R2D2, it’s just a play on the fact that their initials are the similar.
13 April 2014 at 06:14 #26854I think this episode was a great send off for the 9th Doctor. It has a really good moral dilemma at the centre of the story and Eccelston convays it perfectly through his performance. This shows how you don’t need David Tennant shouting to make good drama (but that’s a rant for another time). Speaking of which, the regeneration scene is still one of the best in my opinion.
It surprises me that this is the same man who wrote the previous episode. Did RTD2 bump his head and temporally become a good writer?12 April 2014 at 09:54 #26818I know this May sound insane, but based on all of the on set photos I think that Peter Capaldi may be playing the Doctor
🙂29 March 2014 at 20:03 #26650I didn’t mind this one, not great but not that bad either.
24 March 2014 at 21:57 #26588Here’s The Who performance A Quick one While He’s Away from the Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus
24 March 2014 at 16:44 #26584@fatmaninabox
That’s not true! That’s impossible!24 March 2014 at 08:37 #26578I’m hoping for more stories set on other planets, or at least more UNIT stories so we have a reason for The Doctor to be constantly hanging around modern day earth.
24 March 2014 at 06:51 #26577I think I may have found the most pointless DVD extra ever. I bought The Graduate recently and it includes what the back cover describes as “4 original widescreen excepts”, basically 4 scenes from the film presented in widescreen, even though the film itself was a widescreen copy. Like I said, completely pointless.
23 March 2014 at 06:07 #26567I really don’t like this episode. For me it’s probably the worst story of series 1. Others have mentioned Adam, but I also don’t think the satire works. The episode depicts the media being bias and controlling information, which we all know happens in real life. The problem is that the characters are completely ignorant of this and it seems like the audience is supposed to be shocked when they find out. Maybe it is a surprise for children (which is admittedly what a lot of the audience watching was made up of) but for someone older like myself, it really isn’t.
18 March 2014 at 06:49 #26487I hope she’s just visiting the set, Tegan’s one of my least favourite companions.
16 March 2014 at 17:26 #26464@bluesqueakpip thank you for explaination and I am indeed from the UK, Newcastle in fact.
16 March 2014 at 16:36 #26460@bluesqueakpip I’m not familiar with the term “muttering darkly”, could you explain what it means?
@fatmaninabox if you couldn’t sit through this just wait till we get to Love and Monsters
16 March 2014 at 15:50 #2645716 March 2014 at 14:54 #26452I felt sorry for the pig. It didn’t deserve to be gunned down by the army or humiliated by bad writing.
16 March 2014 at 05:30 #26443@bluesqueakpip Maybe I was being unair to Rose. She didn’t intentionally leave for a year, thinking she would have only been gone for a few days. Maybe I was allowing what happens in later episodes, in which she does treat them appallingly, to affect my judgement.
Also were the Slitheen recurring villains on SJA, I thought they were only in the first series.
15 March 2014 at 19:14 #26439I didn’t see this story when it was originally broadcast, I caught up with it on DVD a couple of years later. Back then I found the political stuff boring and now that I’ve grown up and have a vague idea how politics work, I find it incredibly stupid. The rest of the story seems to be made up of juvenile fart gags. I would blame Mel Brooks for this but I doubt that when he did the first ever fart gag in Blazing Saddles back in 1974 he would have known that it would lead to RTd2 writing a whole Doctor Who story based around them.
Another problem stems from the fact that Rose is a horrible person in this. She disappears for a year without a word leaving her mother worried sick and Mickey was accused of murdering her. Does she show any sympathy to either of them, hell no! She goes off on an adventure with the Doctor again. But of course Rose can do no wrong because RTD2 says she’s the ultimate companion and as we all know everything he says is gospel in the Whoniverse.
Now in fairness to RTD2 the director rewrote parts of the script while filming so the story might have been less rubbish had it followed his original script more closely.
I know this one’s mostly for the kiddies and I shouldn’t get so upset, it’s just that nothing makes my blood boil more then bad Doctor Who.
15 March 2014 at 18:38 #26437Here’s a young Peter Cushing
http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100914040120/starwars/images/c/c5/Young_Peter_Cushing.jpg
15 March 2014 at 16:58 #26419@fatmaninabox McCoy looks almost unrecognisable.
15 March 2014 at 07:08 #26409@fatmaninabox I suppose that the one next to Jack could be Donna (although it doesn’t resemble her at all) but the one I between River and the Angel clearly isn’t Rose because she’s blond and the figure is ginger. Also I’m sure that was the outfit Amy wore in The Impossible Astronaut.
15 March 2014 at 07:01 #26408@janetteb well they all have Ginger hair, so they must be Amy. I ablolutley love Lego but I have to admit these figures look pretty bad. The characters barely even resemble what their supposed to be. The older character options stuff was perfectly fine, why do we even need Lego Doctor Who.
By the way it’s actually @thekrynoidman
15 March 2014 at 04:50 #26405@wolfweed does anyone else find it strange that there are 3 mini figures of Amy in that picture? surely they could have included 2 other characters instead? Although quite amusingly the one on the top left looks like a panda.
12 March 2014 at 19:18 #26364@blenkinsopthebrave That’s the one, cheers mate.
12 March 2014 at 16:38 #26361I wonder if anyone can help me with this. I remember watching a kids TV series several years ago about a town entirely populated by ducks, ecxept for the main guys best mate who was a crocodile. It was on Cartoon Network in the UK and was a CG animation. Does anyone know what it’s called?
10 March 2014 at 12:52 #26318@bluesqueakpip Fair enough, although I personally hate the “it’s for kids” argument as I feel it’s just used as an excuse for lazy script writing (but that’s a rant for another time).
10 March 2014 at 11:41 #26314@purofilion, @fatmaninabox, @bluesqueakpip I realise and agree that the story was about Rose and her reaction to seeing the universe for the first time, but the point I was trying to make, admittedly I didn’t do it very well, was that if the episode have a mystery sub plot, it could at least have some element of mystery to it. It’s fine if you disagree with me though, it’s just my opinion.
10 March 2014 at 05:21 #26310@fatmaninabox RTD making the villain intentionally obvious is actually worse. It makes the Doctor look like an idiot for not guessing who it is. It would be fine if it played out like an episode of Columbo where you see the crime happen and the suspense comes from the Doctor catching them out, but it doesn’t, it plays like a standard detective story just with a very unsubtle profromence from the villain (I’m not going to say who it is in case I get told off for spoiling it for people who haven’t watched the episode, although considering the full episode is at the top of the page it would be their own fault).
8 March 2014 at 19:25 #26270I thought it was alright when I first saw it but looking at it now it’s not very good. It fails as a mystery because it’s obvious who the bad guy is, and it fails as a comedy because it’s not funny (well some of Eccelston’s lines were funny). I do like the ending though, The Doctors speech is very poinient. The effects were fantastic for the time too.
7 March 2014 at 04:38 #26201Choose life
3 March 2014 at 10:50 #26056@blenkinsopthebrave I too love the 1981 adaptation of Day of the Triffids. In fact I have previously suggested we watch that next.
3 March 2014 at 10:46 #26055I remember seeing a billboard with a poster for the first series about a week before this episode aired. My first thought was “great Doctor Who’s coming back” and my second was “wait he’s wearing a leather jacket? Doctor Who doesn’t wear a leather jacket!”. I didn’t really have much interest in watching it after that, but I thought I’d give it a try. I missed the first 10 minutes or so but I still got the gist of what was going on.
Watching it now it’s still a decent introduction to the series although I would personally show a newcomer something like An Unmearthly Child or The Time Warrior instead. It does feel a bit dated at times (as do all series that try to be “hip” and “modern”). Also the bits with Auton Mickey are as cringe worthy now as they were then.
I still think Christopher Eccelston was and is a great Doctor and it’s a shame he only did series 1. Maybe if he stayed on longer we wouldn’t have gotten 4 years of Tennant (not a fan).
This was Rose before she became the unlikable #### she became in the second series and at best she is alright. I don’t understand why she is considered to be “the one true companion” by some fans. Billie was far better as the moment than Rose.
Still it got a lot of people interested in Doctor Who so I can’t really fault it too much. It’s just a shame the RTD era went slowly downhill afterwords.27 February 2014 at 15:52 #25828Here’s a video tribute I made for the Third Doctor a made a couple of years ago although I didn’t get around to putting it online until recently
26 February 2014 at 14:27 #25786Has anyone noticed that the music from Dragonheart and Bean sound the same in some places
18 February 2014 at 17:33 #25428@monochromedimension
Check it out it’s a great film.18 February 2014 at 17:30 #25427@arbutus
Duck, You Sucker was the original title but it was changed to Fistful in some territories to cash in on the Dollars trilogy. It was also called Once Upon a Time the Revolution in France.18 February 2014 at 05:50 #25403I absolutely love the film scores of Ennio Morricone, particularly the ones for the Sergio Leone westerns. Here’s a track from the unfairly overlooked Duck, You Sucker/A Fistful of Dynamite
14 February 2014 at 19:16 #25311Might I suggest watching the 1981 BBC adaptation of Day of the Triffids after we’ve finished Quatermass.
2 February 2014 at 19:22 #24952Philip Seymor Hoffman was found dead today.
26 January 2014 at 07:39 #24686@purofilion It’s @thekrynoidman
26 January 2014 at 07:38 #24685@whisht
I only asked if anyone is a fan because they seem to be somewhat underrated nowadays.26 January 2014 at 07:25 #24684@blenkinsopthebrave
I just found the original to be really slow and plodding. It could be that I saw the film first and was just used to seeing the film move at a faster pace, but I saw the two Dalek films first and that didn’t affect my enjoyment of the serials they were based on.
It also didn’t help that I found Rooney (the hero in a way) unlikeable. He came off as an obnoxious yank, rather like Brian Donelvys Quatermass in the first two films (who was meant to be unlikeable, Rooney wasn’t). The actor from the film did a much better job.25 January 2014 at 10:07 #24623Is anyone else here a fan of The Yardbirds?
25 January 2014 at 05:24 #24620I disagree with your assessment that the film version of Quatermass and the Pit is badly directed.
19 January 2014 at 06:36 #24426I recently bought the two Not the Nine O’clock News DVD’s, and I have to say its one of the funniest shows I’ve ever watched.
9 January 2014 at 04:25 #24102I didn’t really like the TV version of Quatermass and the Pit, much prefered the film.
9 January 2014 at 04:11 #24100My favourite Hartnell’s are The Keys of Marinus and The Dalek Invasion of Earth.
My favourite Doctor would probably be either Tom Baker or Jon Pertwee, although I think that Peter Capaldi might end up eclipsing them when series 8 starts.
6 January 2014 at 14:22 #23998I don’t know if it’s what you’re talking about but according to IMDB, David McCallum was in Frankenstein: the True Story from 1973, which also has Tom Baker in it.
-
AuthorPosts


