Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
1 February 2016 at 10:24 #50746
@puroandson
Oh deat me! How embarrassing! Had I read all the posts I wouldn’t have made such an ass of myself.
Over time, I’ve come not to trust our Doctor, he lies and some things don’t work on him. He could have been trying to spare Clara, whilst she was trying to spare him – grief. We’re dealing with time here, so who nose?
Anyway, you do have a point and I thank you for being kind. *grins*
One thing I can promise all of you who care, I shall watch and comment (should I feel the need) every episode of 10 as they air. None of this tormenting myself rubbish, I miss too much on here.Many regards,
Missy
31 January 2016 at 10:23 #50705Me again,
With luck this hasn’t been mentioned. there are so many posts and I haven’t always got the time to read all of them.
My point/question.
Does anyone feel that when the Doctor is in the cafe, telling the young waitress (Clara) all about his latest adventures, that he knows damn well the young woman behind the counte IS Clara.
In short, I don’t think he forgot her at all, but is simply letting her go. She couldn’t stay with him anyway, basically she’s dead and to stop her feeling sad, he lets her think that she managed to wipe herself from his memory? *thinks, take a breath!*I remember in Dark Water, when she tried to stick that dream pad thingy on his neck, he said. “Do you really think that would work on me?”
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
Missy
31 January 2016 at 10:13 #5070431 January 2016 at 10:11 #50703@puroandson
Spotonski, it was Time Heist.
Unleash all you like m’dear. I love PC to bits too.
I always said there was more ‘human’ in him than the other three. He seemd so vunerable at itmes.
The man is pure magic.
Fingers crossed.
Missy
31 January 2016 at 09:17 #50702Has anyone noticed (of course you have, however…) that the Doctor likes to sniff flowers?
Anyone feel that it may have some significance? I know why he does in Heaven Sent (gravity), but I wonder why the other times?
Cheers,
Missy
31 January 2016 at 09:12 #50701@puroandson
Pudding brains, or clotpoles?
Let’s just put it down to “no taste.” and leave it at that.
Welcome home.
Regards,
Missy
31 January 2016 at 09:08 #50700Yes – TWICE! And I need to see it again. It’s definitely my favourite of the last six episodes, although the other five are marvellous.
The first words he speaks about the shadow, then when he emerges from the capsule wotumacallit, ending : “And I’ll never ever stop”
Just something about the way his voice deals with those lines, brings me out in goose pimples. Not to mention the superb plot. Is there no end to SM’s genius?
Delighted that my post has encouraged you to watch again.
I seem to have found my purpose in life. *big, big grin*Cheers,
Missy
31 January 2016 at 04:44 #50684@puroandson “I suspect, though, that the Stupids have won and want all episodes to be like Blink or The Family of Blood. I loved them actually -Paul Cornell did a pretty good job in that Human Nature two parter. Mainly, though, the Doctor ran, cried, sobbed, snogged and talked (fast).”
As did I puroandson – didn’t like The Flesh though.
I’ve adored Capaldi’s neat and focussed Doctor. Others maybe haven’t and I’m fine with that. Well, actually I want to kill them but the better half of the Hybrid aint in so I’m posting this anyway. 🙂
Thank goodness I agree on Capaldi, so I’m safe — from your perfectly reasonable and entirely justified wrath! [Er — in my ‘umble opinion.]
Don’t be ‘umble, not when you’re right! The man is astonishing.
Cheers,
Missy
31 January 2016 at 04:39 #50683No, neither am I. I quite liked his stuff. He doesn’t shine as brilliantly as SM, but he isn’t bad either.
Cheers
Missy
31 January 2016 at 04:35 #50682Hello each.
Yesterday I gave myself a treat and watched Heaven Sent twice- one after the other. (Have already seen it twice before)
My gawd it’s superb, clever, unrelenting and Peter Capaldi excells himself.
Cheers,
Missy
28 January 2016 at 04:45 #5061828 January 2016 at 04:39 #5061728 January 2016 at 04:35 #50616That’s what I do. I also have a special Visa card, which I call a ‘netcard’ that I use for ordering on line.
Cheers,
Missy
28 January 2016 at 04:33 #50615Yep! I know – known as a QC. I have watched Silk and Judge John Deed *great big grin* and I am English.
It’s the soliciter you consult first.
Thanks anyway.
Cheer,
Missy
28 January 2016 at 03:02 #50614Hello there Mike(?) Welcome, I’m pretty new here too.Just had a quick look at the list:
B. Daniels – maybe.
R. Tovey – possibly
B. Whishaw – Definite posibility
Forget the rest in cluding B. Cumberbatch, he would be fantastic, but he’s too busy and has always made it clear, when asked, that he’d never play the Doctor – perhaps a villain? (He didn’t say that, I did) He can’t play Sherlock AND the Doctor.My choices would be:
Ben Millar
Kris Marshall.
No females please and keep it British. *thumbs up* Our American friends have enough Scifi of their own. *big grin*
As for companions (female) almost anyone but Maisie williams – but then again, perhaps she’d grow on me? Besides, she’s on a Tardis with Clara isn’t she?
Just saying,
Missy
27 January 2016 at 09:06 #50581Me too. Sleep no more was the least enjoyable.
Everything in which Missy has appeared have been winners in my eyes.
Cancelling the whole thing would make me very sad indeed!
I meant to say. Don’t you love the recurring words: “Are you my mummy?” and my favourite: “Yes, we know who you are!”
All I wish is that the media would get their facts straight.
First off the BBC are dropping SM for CC.
Then they are going to axe DW altogether.
Then the new DW could be some chap called Richard Madden, because the new Doc should be – get this – sexier? Don’t like the look of him at all btw.
All this after the complaint that this DW 9, is more for adults than children?
So, the next Doc may be ‘sexy” – perfect for kids!!!!!!!!I’m beginning to get very cross!
Grumpy Missy
27 January 2016 at 08:51 #50580Have just read your post re: Lawyers etc. Obviously it works for Americans, but seems unnecessarily complicated to me.
As far as I know, we have Barristers (as you say taken from “The Bar”) who fight in court – silks – all of whom have different preferences. Some murder, some tax invasion etcetera. Solicitors are who one goes to first. They advise the Barrister on your behalf.
Simple.
Thanks for your reply.
Cheers,
Missy
27 January 2016 at 08:43 #5057927 January 2016 at 08:41 #5057827 January 2016 at 08:40 #5057727 January 2016 at 02:33 #50566@puroandson
“I guess there’s a line in the sand somewhere. Hmm, now where was that line in the sand from? :)”
Very droll. *big grin*
Cheers,
Missy
27 January 2016 at 02:21 #50564I had to smile. The thought of ‘crusty sleep’ from your eyes growing into monsters, doesn’t exactly make me feel good. *grins*
Rather scary methinks?
As for children finding it hard to grasp, you could be right, some of the episodes are a little complex.
Cheers,
Missy
27 January 2016 at 02:17 #5056327 January 2016 at 02:14 #5056227 January 2016 at 02:11 #5056127 January 2016 at 02:10 #50559@puroandson
Thumbs up Son of Puro. I think that you mum will find the book very entertaining. It’s got quite a twist.
Cheers,
Missy
27 January 2016 at 02:06 #50558Fortunately I have a modest fund (which I save for) especaiily for DVD’s, which means I buy the series, therefore no problems.
Missy
27 January 2016 at 02:04 #5055727 January 2016 at 02:00 #50556I thought so, how very confusing. In the old days – according to Dickens – ‘lawyer’ was used instead of Barrister.
It was possibly changed to Barrister and Soliciter to avoid confusion. Unfortunately I never know which is which in American programmes.
Cheers,
Missy
26 January 2016 at 09:29 #50520@puroandson
So sorry! I can’t find the post and would still like to know the answer.
Regards,
Missy
26 January 2016 at 04:43 #50507Having put this on the Book thread and receiving no reply, I thought I’d bung it on here where it might be seen.
Has anyone read or listened to THE LAST SHERLOCK HOLMES STORY, by Michael Dibdin?
Fascinating and very clever.
Cheers,
Missy
26 January 2016 at 04:38 #50505Well, you’re entitled to your opinion zepyr. I would ask one thing, could you find different adjectives please.
Cheers
Missy
26 January 2016 at 04:33 #50502Thanks for that. Matt Smith was fun and played his part well, but there is no comparison between him and Peter Capaldi. You all know who gets my vote.
Gordon Bennett, could this be the demise of Doctor Who.
Pass the bottle!
Missy
26 January 2016 at 04:26 #5050126 January 2016 at 04:24 #50500@puroandson
Just me being picky, but it really gives me the pip!
When you say “Attorney” do you mean Barrister or Solicitor?
I’ve just noticed about your mum. Hope all is well.
Best regards,
Missy
26 January 2016 at 04:17 #5049725 January 2016 at 08:50 #50449Watched video – thanks by the way.
I never rated Rory ( or Amy much for that matter)but he’s a better actor than singer and that’s for sure.
Stii, it was different.
Missy
25 January 2016 at 08:43 #50448I agree. CC should be judged on his writing to come.
His contribution to DW in the past has been enjoyable and Broadfchurch wasn’t that bad, it did have it’s moments.
Lets give him a chance and see – if only Peter Capaldi will stay.
Cheers,
Missy
25 January 2016 at 08:32 #50447“I suppose a related issue is, Will Peter Capaldi choose to stand down at the same time as SM?”
Wash your mouth out! Don’t even think about it. *shudders*
Missy
25 January 2016 at 08:28 #5044625 January 2016 at 08:24 #5044524 January 2016 at 10:42 #50398I have just finished listening to an audio book entitled:
THE LAST SHERLOCK HOLMES STORY, by Michael Dibdin, read by Robert Glenister.
Has anyone else read/listened to this?
Cheers.
Missy
22 January 2016 at 09:37 #50321Read the article by Streven Moffat. It’s a relief to know that DW can go on replacing itself and it’s crew, but what ifthey “can’t get the parts?”
Flippantly,
Missy
22 January 2016 at 09:23 #50320Hello there and welcome.
Re: “I usually go with the credits. When a person is listed in the opening credits, to me, that makes them a companion, even if it’s just for one episode, like Wilfred Mott in “The End of Time” or Craig Owens in “Closing Time”.
Adam, played by Bruno Langley, was the boy genius In DALEK and THE LONG GAME, therefore appeared in the credits
twice. The TARDIS, was his only way out of Van Statten’s underground complex, but he wasn’t a companion.
Captain Jack, wanted to travel with the Doctor, but also had his own agenda.
Sarah Jane, also appeared in about four episodes (I believe) but again, she wasn’t a companion.
Kate Lethbridge Stewart/Stuart, also appeared in the credits, but I don’t think she even entered the Tardis.
ME, definitely wasn’t a companion.
Rose, Martha, Donna and Clara, who were in every episode and adventure are- to my mind – the true companions,
they had the Tardis key.
Anyway, that’s how I see it, but that doesn’t mean that I can’t see what you are getting at.
Cheers,
Missy
22 January 2016 at 08:58 #50319Hello there, to your question?
No, I wouldn’t rate either as a companion.
The Brigadier had UNIT to run and River spent most of her days in prison.
My understanding of a companion, is one who travels with the Doctor all the time, every episode,
until they leave him.
Cheers
Missy
22 January 2016 at 08:50 #50318I do apologise for my typing errors, I got carried away.
Cheers
Missy
21 January 2016 at 07:54 #50300ME is the one possibility I could live without, so I agree.
It isn’t the actresses fault, but I simply can’t warm to her.All my hopes were pinned on Osgood, but now they have been dashed – or have they?
Cheers,
Missy
21 January 2016 at 07:48 #50299Sorry to be so late. I’ve finally watched the video about the arctic.
Outstanding. Why is it that PC manages to bring tears of joy to my eyes?
The man is magical, and so is this video.
Thank you so much JF.Regards,
Missy
21 January 2016 at 07:35 #50298Sherlock – series 4, may not be back in 2017, due to Mr Cumberbatches’s work load.
Just a tick whilst I go off and scream quietly!
Gutted
Missy
21 January 2016 at 07:27 #50297Hello there, a pleasure to greet another senior citizen and paid up to date, almost fanatical Whovian.
I was bginning to feel lonely.
Like you, after THoRS I went straight to “Silence in the Library and Forest of the Dead.”
Unlike you, series 8 shone, it was bold and brilliant. Now the 9mpossible, series 9 burns even brighter.
Also like yourself, I’ve been watching DW from 2005 onwards, relishing the difference between Doctors and performances. I actusally watched the very first DW in 1963 and never missed an episode from then on.
Peter Capaldi has taken the shine off the aforementioned – not much, just a touch. If only he’d been the Doctor earlier.
Still, we must be grateful for small mercies, and to comment on everything you’ve posted would take time, so I’ll leave that to others.
In the meantime, can you even imagine a life without the Doctor? I can’t and don’t want to, it’s flippin’ wondeful.Welocme (should have said that first, *rolls eyes*
Cheers,
Missy
-
AuthorPosts


