Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
1 October 2014 at 21:13 #32836
I had a couple of tracks for characters/interactions. And @whisht will be delighted that there is no thrash guitar here (although I’ll remain silent on the possibility of thrash sax and violins).
For Danny’s attitude to the Doctor being of “Officer” class, this gem by The Damned, Generals, came to mind. Seriously, if you haven’t heard their album Strawberries, you’re missing out.
“and only the wounded remain,
The Generals have all left the game,
With no will to fight,
They’ll fade with the light,
There’s nobody left they came main.”Going back, I can’t believe this didn’t occur for Rusty the Dalek a few weeks ago. His sudden revelation on the cyclic nature of the universe and the wonder of denying your “Pureblood” status. It’s by New Model Army, with violin support by Ed Alleyne Johnson, who I used to open the music thread, way, way back in the past.
“Revolution forever,
Succession of the seasons
Within the blood of Nature,
All raised to rot and die
This purity is a lie”1 October 2014 at 21:01 #32834It’s been a while since I read the novel, but I think they were pictured and more or less presented as giant flies. I think the Doctor describes them as a pestilence, which would fit.
The Tardis Wiki entry is here.
Just a warning for you and anyone else on the New Adventures and BBC range of books from the 90s and 00s. Nothing is canon, but a lot of what went on in those books has been superseded (and the two ranges contradict each other – as do the comics, so 7 has 4 timelines post cancellation if you read the NA and BBC books, the comics and Big Finish, none of which agree with each other). They’ve been raided occasionally for ideas (see Human Nature), but I wouldn’t say anything is cast in stone. Otherwise, Gallifrey was last two times, and to lose your planet once may be a mistake, but to lose it twice…….
1 October 2014 at 20:51 #32833GET BETTER!! WE NEED YOU!!! (Sorry, but people screaming it at me seems to do something) 😉 Seriously though, I hope your Doctors taking good care of you. If he has the people skills of 12, let me know and I’ll come and slap him, until he improves.
I’m guessing it’s all part of the European heritage that’s been shipped about, because Mexico’s Day of the Dead festival is 31/10 – 2/11. You’re right, for the cyclical nature of his timey-wimey stories, SM does like the cyclical nature of the seasons. And we’re in the Season of Mists and mellow fruitfullness, as Keats called it. He was right, mist descending as I wound my way home, and the apple trees branches are straining. Lots of red about. It feels good to be alive!
1 October 2014 at 16:48 #32829@handles
I’ve watched the first Gotham, and enjoyed it enough to want to continue. Its noirish look and feel is a treat. It’s funny – Chris Nolans first Batman film took some familiar aspects from Frank Miller’s Batman: Year One for Bruce Wayne, and this looks to be doing the same as some of the scenes of the young Gordon learning his way around his new patch are very familiar.
I’d say on the strength of the first episode it’s borderline for the age group. There is bloody violence, with a pretty brutal punishment beating (one of the perps having the nickname “The Penguin”). It’s one I’d probably say cast your eye over it yourself and decide.
I think some people may have been anticipating a story about how a young Bruce Wayne becomes Batman, but I don’t think that will ever be the primary focus, which is Gordon, and the type of society Gotham is, and grows to be. With James Gordon, it’s a case of “the one good man” so I can see it touching on The Untouchables territory. I think the problem is, all the mythologies of Batman’s beginnings show Gordon’s attempts to change Gotham on his own fail, so it could be a downbeat story with, at heart, him providing an influence on a young Wayne and a basis for their future relationship.
Fantastic piece of casting for Alfred, Wayne’s butler and Guardian though. Sean Pertwee!
1 October 2014 at 16:40 #32828Just following on from the bit about the timing of the last episode, I note with some humour that the penultimate episode is on November 1st. The day after Halloween, but still, before sundown, Semhain. When the dead return.
I think our poorly @juniperfish may enjoy that thought.
May I just say that I love Autumn anyway. Having Doctor Who back just feels very natural.
1 October 2014 at 16:38 #32827@Purofilion
Apologies if you thought I’d left Oz out of my recap. I know Australia, New Zealand and many others have similar arrangements, but it still astonishes me that many people think that the US ignores it for some reason. I actually think it would play well as a storyline because if you look at the major territories that Who is popular, they all have ceremonies at that time (why I linked to the wiki article, If I’m honest).
I also know what you mean @purofilion. I know a fair few people in the UK who object to the day and arrangements around it because they think it celebrates, rather than commemorates. In a strange way this may be the point of a storyline in Doctor Who, as there is a real challenge of perspectives to separate the actions of soldiers from the commands of politicians.
@handles
Yes, it could be pretty emotional. I thought the little nod to it at the end of the Family of Blood two parter was pretty well done.
I think, in a way it could be very well done and thematically astute as Eleven was an unexpected (especially to him) survivor of a war that lasted hundreds of years on Trenzilore. The commemorations are timed at the Eleventh Hour of the Eleventh Day of the Eleventh Month. To move on, you need to both confront and respect the past. We are post Eleven.
1 October 2014 at 16:30 #32826OK, after watching it a second time, I think this is very good for what it wants to be.
It’s extraordinarily funny. What strikes me is that having a regular part in Doctor Who is a real gift to an actor because, as the Doctor says “It’s a real rollercoaster with you today”. This was a chance to flex the comedy muscles and the regulars rose magnificently. I loved the fixed grins on the faces of the teachers as they welcomed the parents, and the Courntey’s parents grasping for a crumb of comfort. “But last year you called her a very disruptive influence. So disruptive influence is an improvement”.
The monster is a metaphor, I guess, and fulfils a similar role to the Krafayis (aka “the giant turkey”) in Vincent and the Doctor. There, the invisible monster that only Vincent could see was a metaphor for his own condition. That episode was all about that three hander relationship between Vincent, Amy and the Doctor.
In this, the Blitzer was an out of control Killing machine (which is how the Doctor and Danny see each other, perhaps). It even ends up being tricked by the Doctor who says “It thinks I’m its General” (officer class).
I don’t think it’s as special as Vincent, but it’s a hell of a ride.
30 September 2014 at 09:10 #32755Here’s an interesting thought.
- Danny is a soldier with regrets in his past
- The Doctor is an officer/soldier with more than a few
- The Doctor promised to do something in Gretchen’s (a soldier) name. Remembrance, if you like;
- Remembrance of the Daleks was the last story to feature Coal Hill as a battleground;
Knowing that Steven Moffat has forshadowed real world events on the Calendar in his tenure (Beast Below was the first – an episode on voting just before the 2010 general election) I’m wondering if it really is a happy accident that episode 12 (the last episode) is on 8th November. That’s the last Saturday before the 11th November, Remembrance or Armistice Day (Veterans Day in the US), and therefore the day before Remembrance Sunday which is the 9th November this year.
A chance to remember the fallen (and in Missy’s case, to perhaps present them to the Doctor).
29 September 2014 at 09:23 #32666Yes – it’s troubling how many gifted songwriters over the years haven’t felt the need to write odes to their old school caretaker. Apparently there are more songs about people who issue driving tickets. 🙂
I thought @craig nailed it last week with bankrobber (special nod to @barnable for Scooby Snacks), but my contribution this week is a bit of wordplay.
A song about caring a lot (not) which may suit the mood of the Doctor as far as his people skills go. And by Faith No More, so celebrating atheist subtexts real or imaginary.
Oh – and a time travelling connection. Guitarist Jim Martin has travelled time in a Telephone Box. Bill and Ted’s version in their second film. Sir James Martin! Station!
27 September 2014 at 23:09 #32590Get well soon x. ENT infections can be the worst. I once had an inflamed ear for six months, and the infection made me lose my voice during the period. I sounded like Kermit the Frog on helium, which is pretty embarrassing for someone who sports a virtual goatee.
I was interested in the wordplay that @scaryb made on this one – The Care Taker – the Doctor descrbes Clara as his Carer in Into the Dalek. Is his hostility to Danny partly because he fears the separation of his link to humanity?
Absolutely on the Officer front. The questions has always been (and has been posed by people like Davros) does the Doctor ever feel responsible for the troops he leads in his battles? Gretchen is an interesting point in that argument and it will be interesting to see what they make of that as the series goes on. Did he do something worthwhile in her name, or not? Is the survival of Journey Blue (and the other humans in that ship) monument enough?
27 September 2014 at 22:37 #32585I hope you’re feeling better!
I may of misheard that. I thought I heard “I had to pretend to be an Auton for a while (couple of months)”. Something about he and River falling out.
I thought it may have been related to that bit in the Big Bang when River revealed she’d dated an Auton replicant for a while, but it didn’t work out! 🙂
27 September 2014 at 22:27 #32582But those are entirely your own categorisations, and a bit of Our Girl, of what a soldier is, I’ll warrant.
An insurgent can command other insurgents. They more often than not have a structure. An insurgency of one is often called a spree-killer.
A leader, an officer, delivers them to the troops. If you can point me in the direction of the Doctor directly following an order from a superior – or recognising the higher authority of any ephemeral authority, I will concede my point. He is an officer class, because his history is formed by making the military below him (and this is from Hartnell onwards) bowing to his command and direction. Whether it be army, freedom fighter, militia, etc.
The Doctor is a Rupert, because that was what Gallifrey intended him to be. However much he dislikes (or occasionally enjoys) it. He commands the army. His choice was limited after the events in that barn.
27 September 2014 at 21:56 #32575Yes – it’s interesting the differences between those deaths and her reactions to them. I fogot to mention – Chris Addison! Someone I hadn’t heard in the cast biogs turned up for a (hopefully) repeat performance. Are they mining The Thick of It connections?
I’m guessing this inclusion was to highlight the selection criteria for Missy’s special receptions into her afterlife. I’m afraid PC Plod didn’t really cut the mustard.
Except that the Doctor has proven to be officer class time and time again. From his time at UNIT, to Eccleston’s commanding of the soldiers in the Slytheen two parter, up until commandeering a soldiers weapon in Day of the Doctor. He commands – he’s not second class, as Listen’s dialogue from his parents/foster parents revealed that relationship to be. He didn’t go into the Army. He’s a Time LORD.
27 September 2014 at 21:29 #32563You kind of know you are going into humour territory when you see Gareth Roberts name in the credits. Because it’s co-written by Steve Moffat, that can only mean one thing. HUMOUR.
Yep – it’s the lightish entry to a couple of people into the Doctors sphere of influence, and I couldn’t help but laugh at a lot of it. The dialogue fizzes, it’s so very effervescent. A “comedy of errors”, especially as he spies a man in a bow-tie and immediately assumes he’s worked out exactly who the replacement for him in Clara’s affections is. Our hero’s ego is surely a wonder to behold.
Lots to chew over though – the confrontation between Danny and the Doctor is ripe for those questions. He identifies the Doctor as officer class – “he lights the fire”. Hmmm. Also interesting the policeman seems to have been delegated to a lesser status in this “afterlife”. He never met the Doctor and, never heard of him, had nothing to offer Missy, of course.
It’s fun and frothy, but if you approach it on that level and consider Vampires of Venice as the real entry for Rory, I think this opens up the relationships for exploration. The final frontier, etc.
27 September 2014 at 17:04 #32552Hope all the small furry animals cope without you – or are they big furry animals now?!
I understand they will be well catered for, although I think it was for the best that they swapped personnel a week early. Apparently my fixed (and entirely fake) grin at the sight was becoming noticeably strained, as I missed yet another appointment with our TimeLord. I’m back tomorrow night, and will probably be happier.
Many thanks for the offer of your stash of exclamation marks, but apparently IKEA do a range of bulk, flat-pack exclamation marks in their ÄSHOL range of accessories! I have placed an order which I’m assured is rushing to me as I type.
27 September 2014 at 12:32 #32549I can’t believe I’m on the Sofa. On Saturday. Waiting for a new episode of Doctor Who! To put that into context, I’ve had to work the last five, in the evenings into small hours of the morning. This, my friends, is a treat, and an unexpected one, as I understood it wouldn’t happen till next weekend.
So – I have preparations to consider. Fire up the Pizza oven! I demand, wine, woman and song! Bring forth the slaves to prepare the Dungeon!! Alphabetise the furniture!!! Release the were-hounds into the grounds to keep interruptions at bay!!!! Place a bulk order for more exclamation marks!!!! Bwa-hahaahahahhaahha!!!!!
27 September 2014 at 12:23 #32548Yes, the “belief” aspect is a good call @lisa.
If you wanted to get a bit meta, whether you believe an interpretation of the Doctor works, and is the hero, is an act of faith.
In Deep Breath, the Doctor questions why that face, as it’s a bit familiar. Well Caecillius and his family elevated the Doctor and Donna to be their household gods. So they believed.
Again the Half faced man in that episode must (if we are right and he stepped) believed the Doctor was right. An act of faith.
Gretchen well, she asked a question of Clara
Gretchen: Tell me the truth. Is he mad or is he right? I’ve come this far, probably gonna die anyway. Wouldn’t mind something to do for the rest of me life. Is he mad, or is he right?
Clara: Hand on my heart. Most days he’s both.Before she took an act of faith to sacrifice herself.
The Dalek, rightly or wrongly, made his own conclusions about the Doctor but following the path he did was an act of faith.
I think it’s worth dwelling on because whether you believe in the myth of the Doctor confers power to him. In Doomsday, he said to Pete “Perhaps that’s all I need – a few people to believe in me”. Eleven begged Amy to believe in him, before having to destroy blind faith in God Complex (as the Seventh did in Curse of Fenric).
So with a new Doctor bedding in, perhaps that is the subtext for the series. Do you believe he’s the Doctor? Does he?
25 September 2014 at 11:04 #32505It seems to me Clara’s reaction to The Teller, and her struggle with the TARDIS last episode is continuing the business that we had in Series 7. Is Clara a “normal” human? There are plenty of indications that she’s got a little extra something.
In Asylum of the Daleks Oswin manages to resist the Dalek Conversion by forging her own mental reality and resists/conquers the Dalek telepathic Pathweb.
In Snowmen, the Claricle follows the Doctors instructions to imagine the Snowmen (telepathic snow) melted, and even he looks massively surprised by how rapidly it happens.
In Rings, she senses the TARDIS doesn’t like her, and her memories / regrets of times unfulfilled win out where the Doctor failed.
In Hide, the Professor is a mirror character for the Doctor, and the empath for Clara. It’s noticeable that one of the psychic “hot spots” in the house becomes active after she runs through it.
Clara is shown to care a lot about people in all her forms (Entertainments Officer, Nanny, Teacher) and is astonishingly good at reading/gauging people.
Personally, I think she’s a latent empath/telepath, hence her diverting the TARDIS into other people’s timelines when she thinks about them while linked. There is a long history of humans with these abilities in Who (as Hide helpfully reminded us) stretching back to Pertwee’s Planet of the Spiders (and it’s notable that Hide had a Blue Metabilis crystal from that story).
@bluesqueakpip rightly pointed out in a thread on the last series that Susan had these powers as well, but I honestly don’t think that’s on the cards. Mainly because Susan’s story has continued in Big Finish Audio. I don’t think that’s insurmountable, but it would be unusual to discount something in spin-off media that’s an ongoing franchise for the BBC.
I do think that this question of her potential powers is beginning to re-emerge though and I think I may rewatch the other stories in 7b when I get the chance to see if there are additional hints.
25 September 2014 at 10:57 #32504@handles @janetteb
Glad you enjoyed the collection of Rogue’s ;-).
@handles, I meant to put links to the graphic novels (if you want to know more about the comics universe, which is very engaging, try @wolfweed s excellent blog, and there are some documentaries I linked to in the Faces strand).–

Absolom Daak – Dalek killer collected.
Nemesis of the Daleks (which features contributions by Paul “Family of Blood” Cornell)
I did consider Riddell from Dinosaurs on a Spaceship because, you’re right, Rupert Graves definitely played it with a lot of roguish charm, but sadly had to conclude he wasn’t apparently guilty of any crimes for his time. I also considered Vorg from Carnival of Monsters, who was on the dis side of the reputable scale, but decided no in the end.
Oh, and I didn’t notice @lisa had already made a comparison to Farscape’s own bank heist in Season 2 (as always – well worth checking out).
23 September 2014 at 20:55 #32449Rogue’s Gallery
OK, Time Heist introduced us to two new colourful rogues in augmented human Psi, and shape changing human mutant Saibra. To rob a bank. I’ve noted on other forums that the concept seems to have shocked a few people with very short memories, because the Doctor has always had an easy going relationship with a certain type of rogue. You know – the guys who live by a code, even if it’s not the one that’s entirely in vogue at the moment (in legal circles).
Its natural enough I suppose. He’s a hero who nicked a TARDIS, and cheerfully ignored his own societies laws. He’s assembled his outfit from hospital locker rooms on no fewer than three occasions. He’s a rogue himself! Or a Marxist. All property is theft, and all.
But who is the best, and where does this new pair figure in the grand scheme of things? Only one way to find out! Spurious list time!
8.Garron
When the Fourth Doctor started on his quest to locate the Key to Time he forged an amiable (and competitive) relationship with Garron (Iain Cuthbertson), a swindler, charlatan and all round conman. It takes one to know one, as he identified similar traits in the Doctor. The story is a heist in itself, as they both try to obtain a rare stone, which is the first segment of the Key. Who is the better conman? I’ll let you guess.

7.Lady Christina de Souza
Michelle Ryan played the jewel thief and all-round bad-girl in Planet of the Dead. It divides people, but I though she was great, and her over confidence in herself a critical part of the character.

6.Captain jack harkness
People forget that Jack was introduced AS a co-man. He tried to pull a scam that went wrong. Had the right intentions to sort it out though. Maybe that’s the secret of being the kind of Rogue that the Doctor likes?

5.Drax
OK – as I pointed out elsewhere – some Renegade Timelords are evil. Some of them are good. Some of them are dodgy wheeler dealers with even dodgier accents. Drax, who revealed to the Whoniverse that Theta Sigma was the academy designation for the Doctor appeared in the final story of the Key to Time sequence, The Armageddon Factor.
Blessed with a cockney accent that he picked up in Wormwood Scrubs prison, Drax was a character whose allegiances shifted swiftly. After trying to con a true professional, he backed down and the old school (or academy) tie won through.

4.Dorium Maldovar
Didn’t we all love Dorium? Even being beheaded didn’t deflate him that much. SM must have kicked himself after making his end a bit too final, because he’s fricking hilarious in his trio of appearances. Alas, Dorium, someone who owes the Doctor is one of the few who really pays the price for his crimes (including selling River a Time Agents manipulator, with attached hand) by losing his head. He still continues to chew his ear though.

3.River Song
But who is the bigger rogue – the guy who sells the dismembered arm, or the gal who buys it? Her story was twisty turny, but here was someone who matched the Doctor. Of course she was a rogue – a bad girl. With a nod and a wink, she’d insult nazi’s and beguile the psychopath of her dreams.

2.Sabalom Glitz
Possibly the biggest rogue the Doctor has called a friend? The Sixth and Seventh knew him, and he was a bloke (as revealed in DragonFire) who SOLD HIS OWN CREW for bodyparts. Played with swaggering amiability by Tony Selby he was more than a bit of git. He knew it, you knew it – the Doctor knew it.
Glitz paid for his crimes though. Oh yes.
At the end of Dragonfire Mel (Bonnie Lanford) left the Doctor (hurrah!) to rehabilitate Glitz. Poor bugger.

1.Absolom Daak
Those who have seen the mentions of Absolom by @wolfweed and others and who have no clue who he is/was deserve a tutorial. A chain-sword wielding psychopath from the future, he’s convicted of crimes too naughty to mention.
Sent through a void to his sentence to be a DK – a Dalek Killer, he kills, falls in love and suffers loss. He befriends people, including a taskforce including an ice-warrior, a Sontaran, and a Draconian.

He wages war on the Daleks and eventually meets a small Scottish accented man (that’s the First Scottish Doctor) and fights them again to, what for him, is a logical conclusion.
Daak is a great part of Who history for those who grew up with him. Possibly mad, positively insane, and his hatred of the Daleks only matched by the Doctors. You’ll allow us old un’s a fanboy squeal at his mention, I’m sure. It’s worth seeking out his story which has been collected many times.
Oh – and just a mention, Star Tigers, his second story featured possibly the first mention of a clockwork droid! Clickbrain.

If you have been deeply traumatised by having your favourite rogue missed from this selection, I’ll assure you that you can add yours below!
23 September 2014 at 20:35 #32448OK – @juniperfish was quite right. I did enjoy it a lot more the second time around. It’s actually really well put together, and the idea of Doctor Who doing a heist movie is such a good idea, you wonder why no-one has really done it before.
I’ll echo the praise @jimthefish gave to Douglas Mackinnon after last weeks Listen. His direction is great, even when he’s riffing on established tropes (the slow motion “let’s go to work” scene as they walk through the bank is a cliché, but come on – it still looked great). I pronounce him (at this early stage) the Nick Hurran of Series 8 (Hurran made a massive impact with The Girl Who Waited, God Complex, became SMs go-to guy for look, with Asylum of the Daleks, Angels Take Manhatten and inevitably ended up doing a spiffy job for the money in Day of the Doctor).
The Teller is a great construction, and reminds me of some of the great animatronic work that Farscape did (and considering the excellent Jim Henson workshop was behind that, it’s a compliment).
It’s probably been mentioned, but Psi and Saibra seem to represent the two of the underlying themes of the series so far. Psi, with his memory issues (and that was a great little scene, his “final” conversation with Clara prior to seeming to commit suicide) and Saibra with her identity issues.
I actually ended up really liking them, and the scene at the end of the episode with them in the TARDIS actually made me want to see more of them. Hopefully, as @drben mentions, that may be on the cards. Like the Paternoster Gang, there is something engaging about them to me, and their powers seem like a gift for storytelling avenues.
They may be rogues, but they’re the kind of rogues the Doctor has always had an attraction to. Perhaps it’s time for another random and purely spurious list?
I don’t think it has the “holy crap” impact of Listen, but it’s a really good romp.
Oh – and laughed my head off at some of the humour, especially about the calories in the TARDIS at the end. Who wouldn’t desire a guilt free environment?
21 September 2014 at 11:11 #32258I’m really going to have to rewatch that later in the week when I’m not working. The disjointed time-narrative threw me a little on first watch.
Some good performances though. I think we have some ongoing questions about identity throughout this series (as we had in Eleven’s run). The shape-shifter commends the Doctor on being “a good man” but he doesn’t see it that way at the end. Would he like “The Architect”? No he doesn’t. The Doctor hates being manipulated, although often manipulates. The first Scottish Doctor, Sylvester McCoy, would have been happy with a moniker like “The Architect” though, wouldn’t he? Next week we seem to be returning to Doctor and Widow territory with an adoption of “The Caretaker”.
Loves some of the filming in the sequences with Clara and the chase. Again, dwelling on whether Clara is a telepath/empath is is feasible that she could have masked her thoughts from the Teller? It seemed to lock onto her for preference twice.
21 September 2014 at 11:01 #32257Can I add to the post by @bluesqueakpip and ask @jimthefish to reconsider and join again soon. An important poster and colleague with a lot to say. I offer my commiserations to him that the result of the referendum wasn’t what he wanted. I think those who have campaigned and had hopes dashed will inevitably feel a bit low at the moment.
If nothing else, I think the campaign has been beneficial on a number of levels. Personally, I’m glad the result went to No because I’m the kind of boring old lefty who believes that further co-operation and a reduction in National borders is a good thing.
I didn’t always feel about the Union this way, but that was because a lot of the right seem to see it in a peculiar way – tied up with a Nationalism of its own, Queen, Country, memories of empire, etc. But their thoughts shouldn’t (and don’t now) define my own. I’m for Trade Unions, the Union of the United Kingdom and the European Union. I even think more people should join political parties (of whichever almost matches their viewpoint) to try to have their say on forming policy. Would Labour and the Conservatives be the beasts they are if they relied once again on memberships which at one point stood at 1.5m and 3m respectively (instead of the circa 100k plus they are now?).
Each institution has their faults, and you can work within them to change them, or walk away. I think maintaining the Union is an important cornerstone in the future. A really uncertain future where resource use and the impact of climate change are going to be critical questions. The challenges know no boundaries. Neither should we in seeking co-operation and the UK inevitably has a louder voice together.
19 September 2014 at 10:57 #32067Well said @thommck
@handles @purofilion I’ve moved your conversation to the Rose and Crown (starts here). A time consuming business, and I have about an hour on the internet today because of work. (@arbutus @janetteb I’ve moved your responses as well)
Please show some restraint on topics. As you know – the Sofa is where newbies can say hello. It can be off-putting to crash into a heavy discourse on Politics and say “hi I’m me. IS this the Doctor Who forum?”.
Many thanks.
19 September 2014 at 10:38 #32055@nick1235 – I’ve edited the content from your post and placed a link in place to a comment by @wolfweed on the Trailers blog. We can’t move posts between Forums and blogs because the systems are slightly different. It’s here and any discussion on the trailer/preview can be accomodated here because the discussion will be blanked from the activity thread. Many thanks.
http://www.thedoctorwhoforum.com/trailers/trailers-doctor-who-series-8/comment-page-2/#comment-2906
@bluesqueakpip, I’ll republish the trailers thread so it appears on the homepage.
17 September 2014 at 10:28 #31962Oh, well done, young sir, in infecting the whole family. It’s actually pretty unusual to find the route of infection going from young to old as it’s so often the parants who introduce the children. Nicely played. 🙂
Has anyone written one giant document trying to make sense of it yet? I’d be extremely interested in reading such a thing.
Gosh – you’d need a book for that surely? I think you’ll find analyses of various episodes dotted about, and I’d recommend reading posts by @bluesqueakpip, who loves a good diagram. This one on Day of the Doctor, and the contra view by @nick will give you a taste.
I’m also a fan of the approach, and have an interest in the representation of time in the show. I wrote a blog (not one of my best, I’ll admit) on some of the historical perspective to the arguments about time throughout it’s 50 years here. It may give you an overview about how some fans see the show.
17 September 2014 at 10:18 #31961The Greatest Sylvester McCoy Episode Vote in the Galaxy
Many thanks for everyone who has voted so far, and particularly for giving us first and second choices. Perhaps we can avoid agonising tie break situations with an AV system? 😀
So, to date, this is how the voting is shaping up. @wolfweed introduced the wild card, Battlefield, whose typical Thrills! and Spills! are augmented by the presence of Nicholas Courtney as the Brig. His last appearance in the show proper (he made a delightful sparkly eyed appearance in the Sarah Jane Adventures).
Story (Episodes) First Votes
Second Votes
Remembrance of the Daleks (4 x 25 minute ) The Greatest Show in the Galaxy (4 x 25 minute) @arbutus @mudlark @purofilion @bluesqueakpip Battlefield (4 x 25 minute) @wolfweed The Curse of Fenric (4 x 25minute) @janetteB @purofilion @bluesqueakpip @whisht @scaryb @arbutus Survival (3 x 25 minute) @janetteB @mudlark @scaryb If I have misrepresented anyone’s vote, let me know. Voting can go on for some time, so anyone who wants to nominate a story for a group watch and dissection, give it some thought. Let’s do the First Scottish Doctor justice here.
16 September 2014 at 23:12 #31925Ah- not a fan of the metal stylee, are you? One more I thought of, which might be more up your street, is this surprisingly dance orientated track from Siouxsie and her Banshees.
“I get the feeling, that I’m not alone..”
“I get the feeling, it’s someone I don’t know.”16 September 2014 at 23:07 #31923Oooh. Sofa feels about right now. Achy back.
Just to echo the concern about @blenkinsopthebrave. I understood he was investigating ways of watching Doctor Who without access to the Space channel in Canada. I can understand if he’s staying away until he’s seen the episodes, but it’s not the same without him. 🙁
15 September 2014 at 23:18 #31828I’ll take a very modest bow for Don’t Fear the Reaper. It was ingrained into me after seeing the start of a production of Stephen King’s “The Stand” as it was playing in the background as a soldier tries to escape with his family (and spreads the plague). A haunting start to a lacklustre production.
Thanks for the track – never heard that before.
@purofilion
Cocker, in an attempt to be Batman or Spiderman, ended up in a wheelchair after chucking himself out of window (attempting to impress a groupie?).
That sounds like the Jarvis we know and love. He’s weird enough to be the Doctor himself. Yes – it was Jarvis who waggled his arse at Jackson at a Brit Awards. Hilarious fact, I don’t know if you’ve come accross comedian Bob Mortimer (of Vic’n’Bob fame -google him!) but he was there at the awards, very drunk and demanded to represent Jarvis. He walked into the Police Station to see his arrested client as a comedian and failed solicitor and was confronted by thirteen US corporate lawyers representing Jackson, that he just happened to have on hand.
Bob, quite wisely, bottled it and left it to the professionals.
15 September 2014 at 22:49 #31826Oh – we can make a game of anything! Thank our resident musical host @whisht. 🙂
But surely you can’t beat the Iron Maiden track for relevance?
“Fear of the Dark..Fear of the Dark!
I have the constant fear that something’s always near!”Fear related, Neil Gaiman related, and possibly a comfort to the little ones who were terrified like Rupert.
Hope you do include a musical track in future blogs. It’s always interesting to hear.
15 September 2014 at 22:17 #31818So, as far as songs-for-episodes go, I actually can’t better @danmartinuk ‘s choice in the Guardian!
I think, like @fatmaninabox, I was drawn to the FEAR aspect of the production. Fear of the Dark I really enjoy, and this live version makes it sound like a celebration of the phenomenon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnXg46r37o0On the FEAR theme I present F.E.A.R. by all round monkey-boy Ian Brown, which is clever if nothing else:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f8wAXDZ9D0
But perhaps if my theory of the Doctor grappling with his fear of the afterlife (and the opportunity to explore it) is correct, then perhaps we should have Don’t fear
MissyThe Reaper? 🙂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUO_5EALZoMAnyone else got some banging fear related tracks?
15 September 2014 at 22:05 #31816Well met @geoffers! (possibly by moonlight, it’s waning here).
No problems with discussing the Extras for the episode on this forum. It may close down some avenues for speculation, but it’s still official BBC material, so all good. @wolfweed posts them often as videos (and has done here) and notorious spoiler-o-phobe and bonkers theorist @bluesqueakpip has referenced them here. This makes it all official to me. 😀
No problems with Extras at all.
15 September 2014 at 18:09 #31798I wouldn’t put it past Moffat to make Robot of Sherwood as the most important to the overall ark, just to really throw us all a curve ball
How we’ll all kick ourselves, as the secret of the series is revealed to lie beneath Friar Tuck’s robe! 😉
I meant to mention actually – I watched that episode twice and didn’t recognise Trevor Cooper as Tuck. I felt so foolish, as I loved him as Colin Devis in StarCops and I remember @bluesqueakpip met him in her theatre work. D’oh!
15 September 2014 at 17:59 #31797No idea on your post. I wasn’t around earlier.
Also, for the life of me, I cannot find anywhere where you can start your own thread?
We don’t do that. We’re not that eager for troll startups, not being driven by commercial interests and all. If you have an idea for a thread, or want to write a long blog post as a point of view, suggest it on the Web Suggestions thread or contact me (@phaseshift), @craig, @jimthefish or @fatmaninabox by PM to discuss it. We value contribution from anyone who isn’t time wasting and has original thoughts.
This isn’t to say we don’t trust you in starting up your thread. We just don’t trust random people joining with that power. The alternative is something like Digital Spy, which has about a dozen competing threads on every conceivable topic, such as why Peter Capaldi is too old, too Scottish, etc. and gives rise to piss take threads such as:
My opinion is very important, and deserves its own thread
In short order: very entertaining for piss-takers and a nightmare to police for unpaid volunteer mods. If I’ve pointed you in the direction of what you’re after, buy me a virtual pint sometimes, and I’m sure DS will appreciate the reference. Being ad driven, they always need those pageloads.
Don’t bother to thank me for this reply. It’s actually been very therapeutic to type and, as this question of starting threads has been asked often, I shall debate with others whether to add it to the Help or Etiquette sections for ease of reference.
Glad to be of service, and I look forward to your future posts.
15 September 2014 at 17:05 #31795Ok, second watch completed and I’m veering from “Wonderful” to “Beautiful” in summation of this episode.
The deep and lovely dark. You wouldn’t see the stars without it.
Loving it more and more. I can’t help but feel that this episode is more important to the overall arc of this series than we can possibly see at the moment.
Although there was no Missy, and I’ll echo the posters who have noted the second mention of Clara’s lifespan, I’d suggest the interlude in the future is really worth dwelling on.
Fundamentally –
What was the Doctor so eager (so desperate) to see as the spacecraft disintegrated after he ordered Clara back to the TARDIS? The dialogue is ripe with allusions to the afterlife.
The end of the Universe. Some idiot took the Safeguards off (Wasn’t that The Eleventh when he went to Trenzilore in Name of the Doctor?)
“I need to know.”
Says the Doctor, but what does he need to know?
Clara: “There’s nothing living out there.”
Doctor: “That’s one way of looking at it.”
Clara: “What’s the other.”
Doctor: “An awful lot of ghosts.”Is this what he seeks? Confirmation of something he doesn’t know? He continues with the rhyme that has been preying on him.
“Perhaps they’re all just waiting,
Perhaps when we are dead,
Perhaps they’ll come a slithering
From underneath the bed. “The Doctor confronts his fears – abstractly defined as “the unknown”. Surely Death is that last great fear? The great leap into the unknown? I can’t help feeling that his desperation may be related to that. With the gift of another set of regenerations this Doctor is struggling with a missed opportunity in this episode. It certainly plays into the arc of Missy’s “afterlife”. The Doctor is living his, beyond the natural lifespan of his species. Something the Time Lords did consider dangerous.
I can’t help but feel this will play into the series arc quite well.
AND
Loving the sideways slap to the head from Clara to the Doctor as he continues to terrify poor Rupert after the Blanket apparition is banished. No mention of it, like slapgate, but at this rate he’s going to steal Matt Smith’s “slap magnet” crown.
“Her face is so wide.”
Funny that the Doctor used that expression. Clara mentions a pupil used it to describe her when she’s having dinner with Danny in the beginning of the episode.
14 September 2014 at 11:35 #31619Hi @timeloop (and I’ll include @herisson)
We already have a couple of mentions of Missy’s title on the forums, and they’ve remained because when Michelle Gomez was cast the BBC made the unusual decision to include it in the press release. So it’s allowed under Forum rules (Official BBC sources don’t count as spoilers).
It’s possibly worth dwelling that the title attributed to her is a piece of misdirection and designed merely to promote bonkers speculation. I have no idea what a Nethersphere is, and like the “Promised Land” moniker, things aren’t always as they appear in BBC press releases. Think of the official photo for A good man goes to War. A bunch of Cybermen (who appeared for a few minutes pre-credits).
It has been especially hard this series to keep track of what is, and isn’t, official. It makes dealing with plot lines look easy. 😀
14 September 2014 at 10:58 #31615A wonderful episode, and probably encapsulates in a nutshell why I value SM in the role and his writing. He can wrong foot an audience so completely. It was brilliant watching that at obscure o’clock in the morning, when you’re beginning to get that slightly whoozy hallucinogenic effect anyway. I found I’d subconsciously drawn my legs up so I was sitting cross legged on the Sofa. 🙂
The misadventures and misunderstandings of the Date were fun enough, but SM is a past master at that sort of thing. I like how Clara’s empathic nature came to the fore again. Her distraction at the phone call leads her to “Rupert” and we see some of his background (as well as an ambiguous scare (which is often all the more frightening). Perhaps she helps form the Danny of the future. A soldier without a gun. The bravest, and perhaps what Danny dreamed of. The Soldier who is proud of digging wells to succour people, and who weeps for the dead. Parallels with the Doctor?
The Gallifrey intervention was inspired. Her empathic nature again. While linked to the telepathic circuits her concern is with the Doctor, and the TARDIS responds. I found it interesting that she appears to have difficulty separating her hands at that point. Perhaps the TARDIS thought – “oooh – we really shouldn’t be here”. The circular nature of that advice given was cheekily timey wimey and brilliant for it.
A snapshot of the Doctors early life – the lonely little child. The one who ran from the time vortex. The outsider, sleeping outside and with apparently little chance of becoming a Time Lord. The underachiever. One of the most powerful beings in all of Time and Space who, we learn, thrives on fear and confronting his. Fear is his superpower. Lovely. Like The Doctor’s Wife beforehand, this was a flashback that presented something that just gave a small spin to established lore.
Lots to digest and a second watch is definitely on the cards tomorrow. Just lovely to see such an assured and different episode.
Huzzah!
13 September 2014 at 11:03 #31509Roll up, Roll up!
Laydeeeeeees, Gentlemennn’s, Non-gender specific lifeformsssssss! We crave your attention!
We have been gradually filling in the blanks on the history of this most marvellous show gradually, and at the rate that nature (or the BBC anyway) intended – an episode a week.
Earlier this year we took a group vote on an episode for Doctors 1-6, before taking a break for this new series. Just look at those choices people. There are some fine slices of Who goodness in there. When it is concluded, we will begin with Doctor 7, who will fill those weeks between the end of series eight, and the Doctor Who Christmas Special.
But which episode? That’s entirely up to you! Last year we covered Ghost Light, a story almost guaranteed to divide the audience. This year I have collated mentions of Doctor 7 stories that have surfaced, and you can vote for one of them, or nominate something completely different.
So Sylvester McCoy – the Seventh Doctor. The FIRST Scottish Doctor. The STAR (cough) of The Hobbit movies. A man who could hammer a nail into his head for a laugh (I have the video evidence). Which episode is it to be?
The ones I have noted are:
Story (Episodes) Notes Remembrance of the Daleks (4 x 25 minute ) Thrills! Spills! The First Scottish Doctor visits Coal Hill School, which may become a thing! Yes, it’s the unofficial 25th anniversary episode with more Time Lord artefacts, floating Daleks, explosions and random genocide than you can shake a question mark brolly at. The Greatest Show in the Galaxy (4 x 25 minute) Thrills! Spills! Circus Entertainment! The First Scottish Doctor investigates a mysterious Psychic Circus. It’s a monumental opportunity to show off his incredible vaudevillian skills, and a marvellous opportunity to roll some “Rs”. The Curse of Fenric (4 x 25minute) Thrills! Spills! Vampires! The First Scottish Doctor guides Ace towards a revelation and battles old Norse Legends. Its spin on the nature of belief would lead inevitably to Eleven’s God Complex. It is, as they say, a corker. Almost the defining McCoy episode. Survival (3 x 25 minute) Thrills! Spills! Cats!! The Doctor, and the BG years meet their Rrragnarrrock in the final serial before the Gap. The First Scottish Doctor returns Ace to her home, but all her friends are missing. The final in the Ace Trilogy (after Ghost Light and The Curse of Fenric). But anything goes. Except Ghost Light again, obviously. That would be silly.
If you would care to nominate your choice for the story featuring the First Scottish Doctor, I shall collate them over the coming weeks.
I thank you.
13 September 2014 at 10:53 #31508Yes – the good stuff in the eighties does tend to get ignored by journalists in favour of the bad. I can remember posting an excellent written interview with him on the Faces strand (which @whisht certainly enjoyed) where he starts off by asking the writer about an editorial in the Radio Times. It was when Matt Smith started and said “..he’s no Sylvester McCoy.” It obviously preys on his mind a little. It’s here if you’re interested.
As such I’m in the mood to be boisterous and start the campaign for our Sylvester McCoy episode early!
12 September 2014 at 11:20 #31470Morning all. Just popping my head around the door before I trawl out to say I’m unspeakably excited for tomorrow.
As we read loads of pish comments on various forums, here is some pause for thought. Pity the poor BBC complaints interface people, who are required to register the details of every deranged complaint in their extensive logs. Imagine that as a job?
Buzzfeed put up a little article that makes sobering reading with a short extract, which includes old favourites like “I’m not a homophobe, but…”, “Confusing”, allegations of promoting “Bestiality” (between two consenting sentient species, no less) and Sexism. My favourite though is the thought that SM is promoting religion through mentions of a promised land. I think you have to marvel at that person for not realising that, whatever this turns out to be, it won’t be that promised land, and it rather depends on who is making the promise.
8 September 2014 at 20:31 #31332but a scholar? Not really
You’re too modest. As I’m spending most evenings observing the noctural habits of small, furry (and endangered) animals, I’m relying on a small bird (Owl called Errol) to inform me otherwise.

Congratulations on your result! You have an ‘ology!
8 September 2014 at 16:42 #31320You, my friend, are both a gentleman and a scholar.
8 September 2014 at 16:35 #31319We (as an audience) have not, to my knowledge, been privy to the Doctor’s status in life on Galifrey. If Clara can tell Robin about him being “a man born into wealth and privilege” then she really knows more about him than we do. I wonder how much more about his past she knows.
It’s worth watching The Deadly Assassin for a lot of the context to that. It’s established the Doctor is of the Prydonian Chapter of Time Lords, and spelled out that they are the most powerful force on Gallifrey, producing the most Presidents (The Castellan, Spandrell, is horrified by the very concept of a Prydonian Rebel). In conjunction with Invasion of Time, it’s spelt out that the Doctor could have had a secure position of power if he had not run away. He would have found it pretty boring though.
I can’t remember when I made the comment, but it was about the “Cartmel Masterplan”. I confessed I really didn’t like the idea of the Doctor being this “reincarnation of one of the founders of the TimeLords” business. I thought it robbed the Doctors story of its power. He was a “normal” Time Lord who ran away to join the circus of the Universe. That concept of rebel – to not conform to your societies expectations, I found a better role model than the idea he was the reincarnation of a near godlike being.
8 September 2014 at 16:05 #31316A request, if I may, to those people who are so good at searching things out on t’internet.
I’m working on a blog, and I was wondering if anyone had come across an easily digestible webpage/spreadsheet/database with the video classifications for Doctor Who. You know the kind of thing – Deadly Assassin, rated PG for video release, etc.
I was hoping someone had done the heavy lifting for me, and so if anyone has come across something I’d appreciate a link.
8 September 2014 at 16:04 #31315Welcome to the team! Hope you enjoy the site. We’ve had a couple of angry Moff-rage posters over the last couple of weeks, but I think we’ve taken a zero tolerance policy to unconstructive criticism.
They weren’t half annoyed.
7 September 2014 at 10:09 #31237OK – with the first glimpse of a very “men in tights” Robin, I thought I wouldn’t enjoy this, but I ended up revising that opinion pretty quickly because it was too much bloody fun to resist.
As depictions of Hood go, this was knowing (and I’m sorry @theKrynoid man, but wash your mouth out – no one can be as bad a Kevin Costner).
In fact it reminded me of the portrayal of Robin from the time travelling BlackAdder: Back and Forth. The unnecessary laughter, the character who is slightly in love with his own mystique. That version was, of course, played by the late (sadly) Rik Mayall.

But as a central conceit – meeting a mythical figure who turned out to be his own caricature – it played out really well. I loved the Doctors determination to prove that this was a Fiction. Who wouldn’t, with tights like that. Like others I liked the highlighting of the Hood and Doctor “myths” – last year I wrote a blog on Big Finish and in the comments put (on the tricky subject of Who’s non-existent canon):
“I’ve always approached the Doctor as a modern myth, as I said, and myths can get confusing. It’s kind of like asking for confirmation about whether Robin Hood was a nobleman who rebelled, or a peasant who fought back. The interpretations serve their own purposes.”
The Robots – hmm. One parallel for Deep Breath is that these seem to be time travelling robots like those. They had chronicles of Earths history, myths and legends (he shows Robin). Have to think about that.
“You can take the girl out of Blackpool…”
I’m liking Clara more and more (and I liked her last year). The added bolshiness that’s growing as her confidence does reminds me of Sheridan Smith’s Lucie Miller from the Eighth Doctor Audio Adventures (who was also a resident of Blackpool).
I laughed out loud at the scene in the dungeon, and the guards assessment that she was the ringleader (presumably based on the observable evidence that she was the voice of reason as the two idiots behaved like toddlers). Again – another good confrontation between her and the villain, with her prising the back story from the Sheriff (which was a pretty good turn by Ben Miller).
Anyway – that’s my first assessment. Loved it. Back this afternoon with more thoughts.
6 September 2014 at 10:19 #31174Hi – we had a bit of a discussion last year about how to discuss the Eighth Doctor movie. As it wasn’t episodic, we decided to confine the discussion to the Faces of the Doctor thread where we were trying to do “a Doctor a month”.
You can find the discussion starting here, with some observations on the Movie. I’d say add your thoughts to the end of the thread and see if it starts the debate up again. When I have some available time, I’ll see if it’s possible to split the thread/replicate the posts in a Movie thread if there is a lot of feedback.
Cheers.
5 September 2014 at 10:51 #31119Is there any major plot point in the hartnell episodes that shows the dr who he really is?
I think it’s an interesting question about the reference to The Daleks, and filters into the “Am I a good man” debate.
I’d argue his first encounter with the Daleks probably did show the Doctor “who he was” – or at least it showed the audience, and I think that’s was Moffat was aiming at.
In the first serial, The Unearthly Child, the Doctor kidnaps some teachers and they have a misadventure in stone age times (where the Doctor is stopped from braining an unconscious stone age man by his human kidnapee). Not very Doctorish, perhaps?
With the Daleks, a couple of things are laid out which really define the character. On Skaro he meets the Daleks and their adversaries, the peace loving Thals.
The Doctor is shown to be guided, above all, by his burning curiosity – he fabricates a reason to explore, and places his companions in serious jeopardy. It’s a repeating meme for the Doctor, and we owe his curiosity 50 years of entertainment.
Above all – he’s outraged by the Daleks single minded plan to exterminate the Thals, and just as outraged that the Thals unwillingness to fight will see them exterminated. He, with Ians help, turns a group of pacifists into people willing to die to ensure others live. He inspires them, and leads the underdogs to victory. It’s almost the template for many of his subsequent adventures.
The question of whether he is a “good man” in this scenario is interesting. He subverts the Thals policy of peace at all costs to become fighters. Is that a good thing, in of itself? That depends on your point of view. He does it with the best of intentions though, and the Thals survive. It’s by his actions you judge the Doctor – he tries to do the right thing, often in impossible circumstances.
His selfishness by placing his own curiosity above the safety of his companions (including his own granddaughter) is another point, and harder to defend. It is however, the predominant driver for the Doctor to explore. As he says in the Daleks:
You wanted advice you said. I never give it. Never. But I might just say this to you. Always search for truth. My truth is in the stars and yours is here.
The Doctor is one of the most morally ambiguous heroes in history, and it really started very early. It’s worth exploring those first adventures.
5 September 2014 at 10:47 #31118Glad to hear from you, but sorry you’re still not feeling better. Hopefully, as and when your swimmy head can cope with it, we’re keeping you entertained. I couldn’t believe we were having a conversation about red-ish and blue people and you weren’t around. IT DIDN’T SEEM RIGHT!
On missy, I was wondering about that Garden configuration, and it occurred to me that the layout, with the circular display in the centre could be a TARDIS with the theme set to “Paradise”. Now – which flower controls the temporal oscillator? 😀
I agree with you on the theme. There are questions on the Doctors morality that have existed since the dawn of the show, and I’m glad we get a chance to examine theme without, perhaps, the big question of the Time War business, which tended to dominate the debate since the return.
-
AuthorPosts


